2026年4月10日金曜日

 


Endless Myth and the Works of Pier Paolo Pasolini

— Cosmic Myth and Art as Critique —

The novel Endless Myth and the body of work by Pier Paolo Pasolini belong to vastly different domains.

One constructs a multiversal mythology on a cosmic scale, while the other engages directly with society through poetry, literature, film, essays, and cultural criticism.

Yet both confront a fundamental question: how do we interpret and represent the world?

This article compares them while tracing Pasolini’s life as a poet, novelist, filmmaker, essayist, and public intellectual—along with his relentless criticism of modern society and his mysterious death.


1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Mythologized Reality

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It develops through multiverses, omniversal layers, and even beyond.

Pasolini, in contrast, mythologized reality itself.
Through depictions of marginalized communities, religion, power, and sexuality, he transformed contemporary society into a form of myth.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth of the cosmos
Pasolini: myth of reality


2. Domains of Expression: Cosmos vs. Society

Endless Myth operates in abstract domains—
time, infinity, and the structure of existence.

Pasolini worked across multiple forms:

  • Poetry: inner life and social tension

  • Novels: marginalized and subproletarian realities

  • Film: religion, power, and the human body

  • Essays: sharp critiques of modern civilization

His work was not merely artistic—it was a direct interrogation of society.


3. Role of the Creator: Builder vs. Critic

In Endless Myth, the creator functions as a builder of worlds.
The narrative constructs a vast, structured universe.

Pasolini, however, positioned himself as a critic and provocateur.
He consistently challenged political systems, consumer culture, and dominant ideologies.

His essays and public statements were often confrontational, placing him in tension with his own era.


4. Limits of Expression: Conceptual Exploration vs. Social Provocation

Endless Myth pushes the limits of conceptual understanding—
infinity, existence, and what lies beyond.

Pasolini pushed social and ethical boundaries.
Through themes of religion, sexuality, and power, his works frequently provoked controversy and censorship.

His art did not merely depict reality—it challenged the audience to confront it.


5. A Life of Relentless Criticism

Pasolini spent his life in continuous critique of modern society:

  • Criticism of consumerism

  • Skepticism toward mass culture

  • Opposition to institutional power

He refused to conform to dominant cultural narratives, maintaining a position outside mainstream acceptance.

In this sense, he was not only an artist, but also a thinker deeply engaged with his time.


6. A Mysterious Death

In 1975, Pier Paolo Pasolini was found dead near Rome under violent circumstances.

The details of his death remain controversial, with ongoing debates about what truly happened and whether deeper forces were involved.

His death has become part of his legacy—
transforming him into a figure of myth as much as history.


7. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Critique

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a system of infinite existence.

Pasolini uses myth as critique
a way to expose and question the realities of society.


Conclusion: Does Myth Build the World, or Expose It?

Endless Myth and the works of Pasolini represent two fundamental functions of myth:

Endless Myth: myth as construction
Pasolini: myth as deconstruction

The former builds a universe.
The latter dismantles reality.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is myth meant to create worlds—
or to reveal the hidden truths within them?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

2026年4月9日木曜日

Endless Myth and Ahsoka

 


Endless Myth and Ahsoka

— Cosmic Myth and the Expanding Galactic Narrative —

The novel Endless Myth and the series Ahsoka both take place on a cosmic stage, yet they approach the idea of the universe in fundamentally different ways.

One begins as a fully realized multiverse mythology, while the other has traditionally been confined to a single galaxy—only now beginning to expand beyond it.

This comparison explores their relationship through the lens of cosmic expansion and emerging multiversal possibilities.


1. Form of Myth: Multiverse vs. Expanding Galaxy

Endless Myth is built on a multiversal foundation from the start.
Its structure assumes infinite branching realities and layered existence.

Ahsoka, by contrast, originates within the framework of a single galaxy.
However, the narrative is beginning to move beyond that limitation.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinite structure from the beginning
Ahsoka: expansion beyond a single galaxy


2. Cosmology: Multiverse vs. the Emergence of a New Galaxy

In Endless Myth, multiple universes and dimensions coexist as part of a defined structure.

In Ahsoka, a major shift occurs with the introduction of another galaxy.
This marks a significant evolution in the Star Wars cosmology.

It suggests a transition from:

single-galaxy narrative → multi-galaxy framework


3. Characters: Observers vs. Explorers

Characters in Endless Myth often function as observers or participants within a vast cosmic structure.

In Ahsoka, Ahsoka Tano acts as an explorer of the unknown.
She moves beyond familiar space into uncharted territory, embodying the expansion of the narrative itself.


4. Signs of Multiverse Development

This is a key point.

Ahsoka has not fully established a multiverse concept.
However, several elements suggest the possibility:

  • The existence of another galaxy

  • Regions that may operate under different rules

  • Expanding interpretations of the Force

These elements begin to challenge the long-standing assumption of a single unified setting.

In this sense, Ahsoka shows early signs of evolving toward a multiverse-like structure.


5. Movement of Myth: Established Infinity vs. Ongoing Expansion

Endless Myth already operates within a fully expanded multiversal system.
It moves beyond even that, toward unknown outer domains.

Ahsoka exists in a transitional phase.
It is expanding step by step—from one galaxy to potentially many.

Thus:

Endless Myth: already beyond expansion
Ahsoka: in the process of expanding


6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Exploration

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a defined system of infinite existence.

Ahsoka presents myth as exploration
a journey into the unknown that gradually expands its universe.


Conclusion: Is the Universe Infinite from the Beginning, or Does It Expand Through Storytelling?

Endless Myth and Ahsoka represent two stages of cosmic mythology:

Endless Myth: infinity as a starting point
Ahsoka: infinity as a destination

The former exists within an already infinite system.
The latter is moving toward one.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Is the universe infinite from the beginning—
or does it become infinite as stories continue to expand it?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

2026年4月8日水曜日

Endless Myth and Caligula: Ultimate Cut

 


Endless Myth and Caligula: Ultimate Cut

— Cosmic Myth and the Limits of Misunderstood Expression —

The novel Endless Myth and Caligula: Ultimate Cut belong to entirely different genres, yet they intersect through themes of artistic limits and misinterpretation.

One constructs an ever-expanding multiversal mythology, while the other portrays the madness of power through a controversial historical narrative.

Both, however, raise the same question: how far can expression go—and what happens when it is misunderstood?


1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Mythologized History

Endless Myth is a structure of infinite expansion.
It builds a mythology through layers of universes, dimensions, and conceptual systems.

Caligula, by contrast, transforms history into myth.
It takes the figure of a Roman emperor and amplifies him into a symbol of absolute power and human excess.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinite mythological structure
Caligula: history turned into myth


2. Domain of Expression: Cosmos vs. Power and the Body

Endless Myth operates in abstraction—
infinity, existence, and the structure of reality.

Caligula is grounded in the body and power.
Violence, sexuality, and domination are depicted in explicit ways to confront the nature of authority and corruption.

Thus:

Endless Myth: limits of conceptual reality
Caligula: limits of physical and political expression


3. A Misunderstood Work: Not Intended as Pornography

Caligula has long been labeled as pornography.
However, this interpretation is incomplete.

The original concept aimed to explore:

  • The corruption of absolute power
  • The extremes of human desire
  • The psychological collapse of authority

During production, however, major conflicts altered the film:

  • Additional explicit scenes were inserted by producers
  • The original artistic vision was disrupted
  • The final cut diverged significantly from the director’s intent

As a result, the film came to be widely perceived as pornographic, overshadowing its philosophical ambitions.


4. The Fate of Tinto Brass

Director Tinto Brass initially intended Caligula as a serious, artistic work.

However, he lost control over the final edit, and the released version did not reflect his vision.

This experience had a lasting impact on his career.

In later years, Brass moved more directly into erotic cinema—
a shift that can be interpreted as a response to, or consequence of, what happened with Caligula.


5. Limits of Expression: Controlled Expansion vs. Loss of Control

Endless Myth challenges the limits of understanding in a controlled, structural way.
Its expansion remains internally consistent within its own system.

Caligula challenges the limits of representation—
but lost control during production, leading to a fractured and controversial result.

This highlights a key issue:

How much control does an artist retain when pushing boundaries?


6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Exposure of Power

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a system of infinite existence.

Caligula presents myth as exposure
revealing the raw nature of power, desire, and corruption.


Conclusion: Who Owns Expression?

Endless Myth and Caligula illustrate two realities of artistic expression:

Endless Myth: controlled expansion of ideas
Caligula: expression altered beyond the creator’s intent

The former expands within a defined structure.
The latter was transformed through external intervention.

And this comparison leads to a critical question:

Who truly owns a work of expression—
the creator’s original vision,
or the final form that reaches the audience?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 


2026年4月7日火曜日

Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy

 


Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy

— Cosmic Myth and the Universal Desire for Gold —

The novel Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy may seem completely different at first glance.

One is a multiverse-scale mythology, while the other is a grounded story about a hidden gold treasure in Hokkaido.

Yet both works are deeply connected through a shared theme: desire.

In particular, the treasure hunt in Golden Kamuy reflects a universal narrative found across cultures.
This article explores that connection alongside a broader comparison.


1. Form of Myth: Infinite Expansion vs. Goal-Oriented Narrative

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It continuously grows through multiverses, dimensions, and conceptual layers.

In contrast, Golden Kamuy is driven toward a clear objective.
The story converges on a single goal: finding the hidden gold.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly expanding myth
Golden Kamuy: narrative focused on a defined goal


2. Worldview: Cosmic Structure vs. Physical Landscape

In Endless Myth, the universe itself is the story.
Its structure defines the narrative.

In Golden Kamuy, the physical world is central.
The landscapes of Hokkaido, along with its history and culture, play a crucial role.

Thus:

Endless Myth: abstract cosmos
Golden Kamuy: tangible reality


3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Embodiments of Desire

Characters in Endless Myth often represent elements of a larger cosmic system.

In Golden Kamuy, characters embody different forms of desire—
wealth, survival, revenge, honor.

Notably, Saichi Sugimoto pursues the gold while carrying personal promises and the will to survive.


4. The Universal Narrative of Treasure Hunting

This is a key point.

The idea of searching for gold or treasure appears across cultures:

  • Treasure hunts

  • Lost gold legends

  • Myths like El Dorado

These stories symbolize both human desire and hope.

The gold hunt in Golden Kamuy belongs to this universal tradition.
However, it goes beyond simple treasure seeking by intertwining each character’s personal motivations and histories.


5. Representation of Desire: Structure vs. Conflict

In Endless Myth, desire is embedded within structure.
The expansion of the universe and the pursuit of existence itself can be seen as a form of desire.

In Golden Kamuy, desire is direct and tangible.
It manifests through conflict—violence, alliances, betrayal.


6. Essence of Myth: Infinity vs. Acquisition

Endless Myth is a myth of infinity
the pursuit of limitless existence and understanding.

Golden Kamuy is a myth of acquisition
centered on obtaining something concrete and valuable.


Conclusion: What Do Humans Truly Seek?

Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy represent two forms of desire:

Endless Myth: the desire for infinity
Golden Kamuy: the desire for tangible value

The former is abstract and limitless.
The latter is grounded and immediate.

Yet both reveal a fundamental truth:
humans are beings who are always searching for something.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

What do humans truly seek—
the infinite understanding of existence,
or something they can hold in their hands?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

2026年4月6日月曜日

Endless Myth and Korean Dramas

 


Endless Myth and Korean Dramas

— Cosmic Myth and Modern Love-Hate Narratives —

The novel Endless Myth and contemporary Korean dramas (K-dramas) may appear to belong to completely different genres.

One explores mythology on a multiversal scale, while the other focuses on human relationships in modern society.

Yet both are deeply connected through a shared question: how is myth reconstructed in the modern world?

This article compares them through the lenses of myth structure, character, emotional conflict, and modern adaptation.


1. Form of Myth: Cosmic Expansion vs. Everyday Focus

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It extends through multiverses and omniversal structures, exploring existence itself.

Korean dramas, in contrast, bring myth into everyday life.
Their settings revolve around family, romance, and work—familiar spaces for modern audiences.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth expanding toward the cosmos
K-dramas: myth grounded in everyday life


2. Myth Structure: Abstract Systems vs. Relationship Networks

In Endless Myth, the universe itself forms the structure of myth.
Layers of reality and divine hierarchies define the narrative framework.

In Korean dramas, relationships form the structure.
Family ties, romantic entanglements, betrayal, and revenge create a complex emotional network.

Thus:

Endless Myth: cosmic structure
K-dramas: relational structure


3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Emotional Beings

Characters in Endless Myth often represent elements of a larger cosmic system.

In Korean dramas, characters are driven by emotion.
Love, jealousy, anger, ambition, and revenge shape their actions and decisions.

So:

Endless Myth: concept-driven characters
K-dramas: emotion-driven characters


4. Love and Conflict: The Modernization of Myth

This is the most important point.

The love-hate narratives in Korean dramas mirror the structure of classical mythology:

  • Love and betrayal

  • Blood ties and conflict

  • Revenge and fate

These elements are found in ancient myths across cultures.

K-dramas reinterpret them within modern contexts—
corporate power struggles, family dynamics, and romantic relationships.

In this sense, Korean dramas are not separate from myth;
they are modernized mythologies expressed through human relationships.


5. Time and Fate: Infinite Possibility vs. Narrative Destiny

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
All possibilities coexist across different realities.

In Korean dramas, time is linear but shaped by fate.
Characters move within seemingly unavoidable emotional and relational trajectories.


6. Essence of Myth: Structure and Emotion

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a system of infinity, existence, and cosmic order.

Korean dramas present myth as emotion
stories driven by human relationships and emotional intensity.


Conclusion: Has Myth Descended from the Cosmos into Human Life?

Endless Myth and Korean dramas represent two stages of myth:

Endless Myth: myth at the cosmic level
K-dramas: myth adapted to human society

The former approaches the origin of myth.
The latter represents its transformation into modern storytelling.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Does myth originate in the vast structure of the cosmos—
or is it ultimately completed within human emotion and relationships?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

2026年4月5日日曜日

 


Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris

— Cosmic Myth and the Limits of Human Emotion —

The novel Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris (directed by Bernardo Bertolucci) operate in entirely different domains, yet both confront the limits of human experience.

One explores infinity through multiversal structure, while the other dives into the extremes of emotion, intimacy, and isolation.

At the time of its release, Last Tango in Paris sparked intense global controversy—making it not only a film, but a cultural flashpoint.


1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Enclosed Intimacy

Endless Myth is built upon infinite expansion.
Its narrative extends across multiverses and omniversal layers, forming a boundless mythological structure.

In contrast, Last Tango in Paris unfolds within a highly confined emotional space.
The anonymous relationship between two individuals becomes the entire universe of the story.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding myth
Last Tango: myth formed within a closed emotional space


2. Domain of Expression: Cosmos vs. Emotion

Endless Myth operates in the realm of abstraction—
time, space, infinity, and existence itself.

Last Tango in Paris focuses on raw human emotion—
loneliness, grief, desire, and psychological exposure.

Thus:

Endless Myth: limits of conceptual reality
Last Tango: limits of emotional reality


3. Characters: Structural Entities vs. Emotional Exposure

Characters in Endless Myth are often positioned within a larger cosmic system.
They function as parts of a vast structure.

In Last Tango in Paris, characters strip away social identity and expose their inner selves.
The performance of Marlon Brando, in particular, reveals deep emotional vulnerability and existential despair.


4. Controversy at Release: Censorship and Ethical Debate

Last Tango in Paris generated major controversy upon release:

  • Explicit sexual content

  • Scenes raising serious ethical concerns

  • Bans, censorship, and legal action in multiple countries

In Italy, the film led to a court ruling, confiscation of prints, and legal consequences for the director.

In later years, discussions about consent during production further complicated its legacy, making it a subject of ongoing ethical debate—not just artistic evaluation.


5. Limits of Expression: Art or Transgression?

Endless Myth challenges the limits of human understanding.
It explores infinity, cosmic structure, and what lies beyond comprehension.

Last Tango in Paris challenges emotional and physical boundaries.
However, it also raises the question of whether those boundaries were crossed in ethically problematic ways.

The central issue becomes:

Is pushing limits an act of artistic expression—
or does it risk becoming transgression?


6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Emotional Exposure

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a system of infinity and existence.

Last Tango in Paris presents human experience as exposure
revealing emotion and desire without concealment.


Conclusion: Does Myth Exist in the Cosmos or Within the Human Psyche?

Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris approach the nature of humanity from opposite directions:

Endless Myth: understanding humanity through cosmic structure
Last Tango: revealing humanity through emotional depth

The former questions existence through abstraction.
The latter exposes it through raw experience.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth reside in the vast structure of the universe—
or does it emerge from the deepest layers of human emotion?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

2026年4月4日土曜日

Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses

 


Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses

— Cosmic Myth and the Limits of Bodily Expression —

The novel Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses (directed by Nagisa Oshima) move in completely different directions, yet both can be understood as works that confront the limits of expression.

One pushes toward the limits of the cosmos, infinity, and existence.
The other confronts the limits of the body, desire, and social taboo.

At the time of its release, In the Realm of the Senses provoked intense debate.
This comparison includes that historical and cultural context.


1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Extreme Experience

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
Through multiverses and omniversal structures, it explores existence itself as a system.

In contrast, In the Realm of the Senses is an intensely focused experience.
The narrative narrows almost entirely to the relationship between two individuals, amplifying desire to its extreme.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth expanding toward infinity
In the Realm of the Senses: experience condensed to an extreme point


2. Domain of Expression: Cosmos vs. Body

Endless Myth operates in an abstract domain.
Time, dimensions, and infinity form its core themes.

In the Realm of the Senses is grounded entirely in the body.
Desire, sexuality, and physical sensation become the central language of the work.

Thus:

Endless Myth: limits of abstraction
In the Realm of the Senses: limits of the body


3. Characters: Structural Entities vs. Beings of Desire

Characters in Endless Myth are often positioned within a cosmic structure.
They function as parts of a larger conceptual system.

In In the Realm of the Senses, characters are driven by desire.
They move beyond social roles and become embodiments of pure impulse.


4. Historical Controversy: Art or Pornography?

In the Realm of the Senses sparked major controversy upon release.

  • Explicit, unsimulated sexual content

  • Crossing perceived boundaries of cinematic representation

  • Conflicts with censorship laws and legal systems

In Japan, legal and censorship issues led to complex production and distribution circumstances, including completion and release abroad.

The film became a central case in debates over whether it should be considered art or pornography.


5. Limits of Expression: Challenge or Transgression?

Endless Myth challenges conceptual limits.
It explores infinity, the structure of existence, and what lies beyond comprehension.

In the Realm of the Senses challenges physical and ethical limits.
It blurs boundaries between sexuality, violence, and representation.

The key question becomes:

Is this a challenge to the limits of expression—
or merely an act of excess?


6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Impulse

Endless Myth presents myth as structure
a system of infinity and existence.

In the Realm of the Senses presents humanity as impulse
driven by desire and instinct.


Conclusion: How Far Can Expression Go?

Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses represent two radically different approaches to the limits of expression:

Endless Myth: pushing the limits of conceptual understanding
In the Realm of the Senses: pushing the limits of physical and ethical representation

The former challenges the limits of comprehension.
The latter challenges the limits of depiction.

And this comparison leads to an unavoidable question:

How far should expression be allowed to go?
Is confronting limits an act of art—
or does it risk becoming transgression?


Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon