2026年3月31日火曜日

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G Requiem

— A Comparison of Multiverse Myth at the Edge of Collapse and Reconstruction —

The novel Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G Requiem both explore myth on a multiversal scale, moving beyond simple expansion into themes of collapse, reconstruction, and redefinition.

Rather than merely depicting vast universes, both works enter what could be called the terminal phase of multiverse mythology—where systems break down and meaning itself is questioned.

This article presents a comparison from the perspective of myth at its end stage.

1. Form of Myth: Endless Expansion and Reconstruction After Collapse

Endless Myth is fundamentally a mythology of infinite expansion.
However, this expansion eventually approaches limits—suggesting boundaries, or even an “outside” beyond the system.

In contrast, Episode.G Requiem begins within collapse.
Its world is already fractured, and the narrative focuses on rebuilding meaning from that destruction.

In short:

Endless Myth: a myth approaching its limit through expansion
Requiem: a myth reconstructed after collapse

2. Cosmology: Toward the Outside vs. Internal Breakdown

In Endless Myth, the multiverse remains a vast structure.
Yet the emergence of concepts beyond it—something like an outer, unknowable domain—raises questions about what lies outside the system.

In Episode.G Requiem, the multiverse itself has already broken down.
Worlds overlap, timelines distort, and order collapses from within.

Thus:

Endless Myth: a universe reaching outward
Requiem: a universe collapsing inward

3. Characters: Observers of Structure vs. Warriors of the End

Characters in Endless Myth function as observers and participants within a vast structure.
They perceive, analyze, and sometimes interact with the architecture of the multiverse.

In Episode.G Requiem, characters are survivors of the end.
They fight within a broken reality, asserting their existence amid collapse.

Figures like Aiolia evolve beyond simple warriors into agents of mythic reconstruction.

4. Time and Causality: Infinite Branching vs. Temporal Collapse

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
All possibilities exist simultaneously, forming a stable, though incomprehensible, structure.

In Episode.G Requiem, time itself collapses.
Past, present, and future merge, and causality breaks down.

Comparison:

Endless Myth: the limit of branching time
Requiem: the collapse of time itself

5. Movement of Myth: Toward the Limit vs. From the End to Renewal

Endless Myth moves toward an ultimate limit.
Beyond that limit lies a realm where conventional logic, mathematics, and narrative may no longer apply.

Episode.G Requiem moves in the opposite direction.
From the ruins of a broken myth, it seeks renewal—rebuilding meaning and structure from destruction.

6. Core as Multiverse Myth

Endless Myth mythologizes the edge of infinity—the outermost boundary of structure and understanding.

Episode.G Requiem mythologizes the aftermath of collapse—what remains when structure fails, and how meaning can be reborn.

Conclusion: Does Myth End, or Begin Again After the End?

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G Requiem represent two ultimate directions of multiverse mythology:

Endless Myth: a myth moving toward the end of infinity
Requiem: a myth beginning from the end

The former attempts to go beyond the concept of an ending.
The latter begins precisely from that ending.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth truly reach an end—
or is the end itself the beginning of a new myth?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月30日月曜日

Endless Myth vs. Saint Seiya Episode.G Assassin

— Multiverse Myth as Expansion vs. Collision —

The novel Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G Assassin both delve deeply into the concept of the multiverse as a foundation for mythology.

While traditional myths are often confined to a single world or timeline, these works explore multiple universes, overlapping realities, and divergent possibilities existing simultaneously.

Here, we examine them purely as multiverse mythologies.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Generation vs. Intersecting Worlds

Endless Myth presents a multiverse that is continuously and infinitely generated.
Its structure expands outward—from multiverse to omniverse and beyond—without limit.

In contrast, Episode.G Assassin is defined by the intersection of worlds.
Different timelines and alternate histories converge, bringing multiple versions of reality into direct contact.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly generating multiverse
Episode.G Assassin: intersecting and colliding multiverse

2. Cosmology: Structural System vs. Interfering Realities

In Endless Myth, the multiverse exists as a grand, stable structure.
All universes are layered within a hierarchy, forming a coherent system.

In Episode.G Assassin, universes actively interfere with one another.
Different worlds overlap, causing contradictions, distortions, and instability.

Thus:

Endless Myth: multiverse as a stable structure
Episode.G Assassin: multiverse as unstable interference

3. Characters: Observers vs. Multiplicity of Self

In Endless Myth, characters function as observers or components within the cosmic structure.
They perceive or exist within the expanding system of the multiverse.

In Episode.G Assassin, multiple versions of the same character can exist simultaneously.
For example, Aiolia may appear in different forms across timelines, coexisting and even confronting one another.

So:

Endless Myth: individuals exist within structure
Episode.G Assassin: individuals multiply and collide

4. Time and Causality: Infinite Branching vs. Paradox

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
Parallel worlds naturally proliferate, and contradictions are absorbed into the larger structure.

In Episode.G Assassin, branching timelines eventually intersect, creating paradoxes.
Conflicting causalities collide, destabilizing reality itself.

Comparison:

Endless Myth: stable branching
Episode.G Assassin: unstable convergence

5. Movement of Myth: Expansion vs. Convergence and Conflict

Endless Myth expands outward endlessly.
New universes, entities, and concepts are continuously added.

Episode.G Assassin moves toward convergence.
Different universes gather into a single point, where conflict emerges through collision.

6. Essence as Multiverse Myth

Endless Myth mythologizes the multiverse itself.
Structure, infinity, and existence become the core of the myth.

Episode.G Assassin uses the multiverse as a narrative device.
By colliding different possibilities, it generates drama and battle.

Conclusion: Does the Multiverse Expand or Collide?

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G Assassin present two directions of multiverse mythology:

Endless Myth: an infinitely expanding multiverse myth
Episode.G Assassin: a colliding, intersecting multiverse myth

The former builds through expansion.
The latter builds through conflict and convergence.

And this leads to a central question:

Is the multiverse something that expands endlessly—
or a space where different possibilities inevitably collide?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月29日日曜日

Endless Myth vs. Saint Seiya Episode.G

— Cosmic Expanding Myth vs. Warrior-Centered Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G are both mythological works depicting gods, humans, and the cosmos.

However, their focus is very different.
Endless Myth presents an expanding, universe-scale mythology, while Episode.G emphasizes individual warriors and their interactions with the gods, forming a hero-centered myth.

Here, we compare them in terms of myth structure, cosmology, character focus, battle depiction, and the concept of time.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding Myth vs. Warrior-Centered Myth

Endless Myth is a mythology that continuously expands across the universe.
Multiverses, omniverses, and beyond generate new layers of myth indefinitely.

In contrast, Episode.G focuses on specific warriors and their interaction with gods.
Characters like Leo Aiolia and the other Gold Saints take center stage.

In short:

Endless Myth: universe-scale expanding myth
Episode.G: hero-focused warrior myth

2. Cosmology: Structural Infinity vs. Divine Order

In Endless Myth, the cosmos is an infinite layered structure.
Divine realms, devil worlds, and multidimensional planes overlap, forming a vast mythological system.

In Episode.G, the universe is structured around divine authority.
Gods such as Athena and Hades define cosmic order through their domains and conflicts.

Key difference:

Endless Myth: the universe itself is the structure
Episode.G: the universe is ruled by gods and warriors

3. Character Focus: Transcendent Beings vs. Warrior Protagonists

In Endless Myth, gods are conceptual and transcendent.
Humans and other beings exist only as part of the cosmic structure.

In Episode.G, while gods are transcendent, the narrative centers on the warriors.
They are human-like but wield mythic powers, and the story unfolds through their individual battles.

Thus:

Endless Myth: gods are central, humans are structural
Episode.G: warriors are central, myth unfolds through their actions

4. Battle Depiction: Symbolic vs. Concrete

In Endless Myth, conflicts are often symbolic, representing cosmic principles or multidimensional structures rather than physical combat.

In Episode.G, battles are concrete and visually spectacular.
Fists, techniques, golden armors, and light effects define the mythic action.

Summary:

Endless Myth: symbolic combat
Episode.G: physical, heroic combat

5. Concept of Time: Infinite Branching vs. Linear-Historical

In Endless Myth, time is infinitely branching and multidimensional.
Parallel worlds and multiverses embody this expansive temporal logic.

In Episode.G, time is linear and historically continuous.
Past events from Saint Seiya lead into future conflicts, creating a structured historical narrative.

6. Nature as Modern Myth

Endless Myth represents a modern, universe-scale mythology integrating ideas of infinity and multiverse theory.
Science-fiction elements and myth blend into one framework.

Episode.G is a re-enactment of classical myth, particularly Greek mythology, reconstructed into a modern hero-focused manga.

Conclusion: Should Myth Expand Across the Universe or Focus on Warriors?

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya Episode.G demonstrate two distinct forms of myth:

Endless Myth: an expanding, cosmic-scale mythology
Episode.G: a hero-centered warrior mythology

The former builds myth through expansion.
The latter builds myth through individual combat narratives.

And this comparison leads to the central question:

Should myth exist as an infinite, universe-spanning structure,
or should it be experienced through human-scale stories of warriors?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月28日土曜日

Endless Myth vs. Saint Seiya: Next Dimension

— Expanding Multiverse Myth vs. Cyclical Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and Saint Seiya: Next Dimension – The Myth of Hades both explore mythological structures involving gods, humans, and the universe itself.

However, their directions are fundamentally different.
One presents an ever-expanding cosmic mythology, while the other builds a myth that repeats through time and reincarnation.

Here, we compare them through the lenses of myth structure, cosmology, the relationship between gods and humans, the concept of time, and the dynamics of myth.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding vs. Cyclical

Endless Myth is structured as a mythology that continuously expands.
It grows outward into multiverses, omniverses, and beyond, endlessly generating new layers of existence.

In contrast, Saint Seiya: Next Dimension is a cyclical myth.
Past and present intertwine, and the same mythological conflicts reoccur in different forms.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly expanding myth
Next Dimension: endlessly repeating myth

2. Cosmology: Structural Infinity vs. Divine Order

In Endless Myth, the universe is an infinite layered structure.
Divine realms, multidimensional worlds, and parallel existences are integrated into a single vast system.

In Next Dimension, the cosmos is structured around divine authority.
Gods such as Athena and Hades define the order of the universe through their domains and conflicts.

This highlights a key difference:

Endless Myth: the universe is the structure
Next Dimension: the universe is ruled by gods

3. Gods and Humans: Transcendence vs. Representation

In Endless Myth, gods exist as fully transcendent beings.
They operate beyond time, space, and dimensional limits, with humans as only a small part of a larger system.

In Next Dimension, humans actively carry the will of the gods.
The Saints fight as representatives of divine power.

Characters like Pegasus Seiya stand at the center of myth despite being human.

Thus:

Endless Myth: humans are part of the structure
Next Dimension: humans enact the myth

4. Concept of Time: Branching vs. Repeating

Time in Endless Myth is neither linear nor cyclical—it branches infinitely.
Parallel worlds and multiversal divergence define its structure.

In Next Dimension, time is explicitly cyclical.
Past holy wars and present conflicts overlap, forming a repeating historical pattern.

So:

Endless Myth: branching time
Next Dimension: repeating time

5. Movement of Myth: Expansion vs. Convergence

Endless Myth expands outward.
Worlds, entities, and concepts continuously multiply, dispersing the myth across infinite scales.

Next Dimension, however, moves toward convergence.
All conflicts ultimately center on the struggles between gods, bringing the narrative toward a focal point.

6. Nature as Modern Myth

Endless Myth represents a modern cosmic mythology.
It integrates scientific, philosophical, and infinite frameworks into myth-making.

Next Dimension is a re-enactment of classical mythology, particularly influenced by Greek myth.
It reconstructs ancient divine conflicts in a modern narrative form.

Conclusion: Does Myth Expand or Repeat?

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya: Next Dimension present two fundamental movements of myth:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding mythology
Next Dimension: eternally repeating mythology

The former builds myth through expansion.
The latter builds myth through repetition.

And this contrast leads to a central question:

Is myth something that continuously creates new forms—
or something that achieves completion through repetition?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月27日金曜日

Endless Myth vs. 300

— Cosmic Myth vs. Physical Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and the film 300 may appear completely different at first glance.
One is a myth on the scale of the multiverse, while the other is a historical war narrative rooted in ancient times.

Yet both works share a fundamental goal: the reconstruction of myth in a modern form.

Here, we compare them through the lenses of myth structure, scale, physicality, and creative direction.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding Myth vs. Condensed Myth

Endless Myth is a mythology that continuously expands.
Its structure grows outward—multiverse, omniverse, and beyond—turning myth itself into an ever-proliferating system.

In contrast, 300 is a highly condensed myth.
It focuses on a single event, the Battle of Thermopylae, stripping away excess to heighten symbolic intensity.

In short:

Endless Myth: an ever-expanding myth
300: a myth compressed into a single point

2. Cosmology: Infinite Structure vs. Closed Battlefield

In Endless Myth, the universe is layered and infinite.
Reality, divine realms, and multidimensional worlds overlap, forming a narrative-driven cosmos.

By contrast, the world of 300 is extremely closed.
The setting is largely confined to Thermopylae, portrayed almost as if it were the entirety of existence.

This limitation strengthens its mythic power.
Within a restricted space, human beings are transformed into mythic entities.

Here, we see the contrast between “infinity” and “closure.”

3. Role of the Creator: Architect vs. Sculptor

In Endless Myth, the creator acts as an architect of cosmic structure.
Narrative, gods, and concepts are integrated into a vast mythological system.

In 300, director Zack Snyder functions more like a sculptor.
He reshapes historical material into myth through stylized violence, exaggerated bodies, and visual intensity.

In short:

Endless Myth: designs myth
300: carves myth

4. Physicality: Conceptual Gods vs. Embodied Gods

The beings in Endless Myth are conceptual and transcendent.
They manipulate time, space, and dimensions, existing beyond human physicality.

In 300, myth is expressed through the body.
Muscle, wounds, blood, and voice define its world.

Most notably, Leonidas I is portrayed as a mythic hero through physical presence, despite being human.

Thus:

Endless Myth: gods as concepts
300: gods as bodies

5. Power of Myth: Interpreted vs. Experienced

Endless Myth becomes meaningful through interpretation.
Readers engage with its structure, gradually uncovering the logic of its universe.

300, on the other hand, operates through sensation.
It delivers myth as an immediate experience through visuals, sound, and rhythm.

It does not require interpretation to function—it is felt before it is understood.

6. Position as Modern Myth

Endless Myth belongs to the lineage of modern cosmic mythology.
It integrates science, philosophy, and infinity into a new mythological framework.

300 represents a modern reconstruction of heroic myth.
It revives ancient epic traditions through cinematic expression.

Conclusion: Should Myth Expand or Be Reduced?

Endless Myth and 300 present two opposing forms of myth:

Endless Myth: an infinitely expanding cosmic mythology
300: an extremely condensed heroic mythology

The former builds myth through expansion.
The latter builds myth through reduction.

And this contrast leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth gain power by expanding infinitely—
or by being stripped down to its absolute essence?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月26日木曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Jodorowsky's Dune

Completed Myth vs. Unfinished Myth

The novel The Endless Myth and Jodorowsky’s Dune are both attempts to create a cosmic-scale mythology. However, one exists as a completed narrative, while the other remains an unrealized vision.

This contrast makes the comparison especially compelling. One is a myth you can read and experience directly. The other survives as an idea, expanding through imagination rather than a finished form.

This article compares them through their form of myth, their vision of the universe, the role of the creator, and the meaning of being unfinished.

1. The Form of Myth: Finished Work vs. Conceptual Vision

The Endless Myth is a complete narrative.
It presents a structured myth that readers can follow, interpret, and understand.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, on the other hand, was never completed as a film.
Its existence lies in scripts, concept art, and the stories surrounding its production.

The Endless Myth: a finished myth.
Jodorowsky’s Dune: a myth that exists as a concept.

2. The Universe: Narrative Structure vs. Consciousness

In The Endless Myth, the universe is structured through story.
Myth and narrative give shape to existence.

In Jodorowsky’s Dune, the universe is imagined as something more spiritual and consciousness-driven.
The project aimed to transform human awareness, not just tell a story.

This highlights a key contrast: narrative versus consciousness.

3. The Role of the Creator: Storyteller vs. Visionary

In The Endless Myth, the creator functions as a storyteller, presenting a mythological framework for the universe.

In contrast, Alejandro Jodorowsky saw himself less as a conventional director and more as a visionary.
His goal was not just to make a film, but to create an experience that would awaken and transform the audience.

4. Influence: Direct Experience vs. Expanding Legacy

The Endless Myth influences readers through its completed narrative.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, despite never being made, had a wide impact on later science fiction.
Many of the artists involved went on to shape the visual language of future films.

Its influence spread precisely because it remained open and unfinished.

5. The Meaning of Being Unfinished

This is the most important difference.

The Endless Myth, as a finished work, presents a defined universe.
Readers can engage with it as a complete system of meaning.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, by remaining unfinished, retains limitless potential.
It continues to grow in the imagination of those who encounter its ideas.

In this sense, it becomes a myth that never stops expanding.

Conclusion: Should Myth Be Completed?

These two works represent different forms of myth:

The Endless Myth: a completed cosmic narrative.
Jodorowsky’s Dune: an unfinished myth that lives through imagination.

One exists through being told.
The other exists through being imagined.

And this leads to a deeper question:

Does myth gain strength by being completed, or by remaining open and unfinished?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月25日水曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

Cosmic Myth vs. Modern Reincarnation Myth

At first glance, The Endless Myth and That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime seem completely different. One is a philosophical story about the structure of the universe, while the other is an isekai fantasy about a man reborn in another world.

However, when viewed through the lens of mythology, both works reveal surprising similarities.

The Endless Myth presents the universe itself as a myth.
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime represents a form of modern mythology, reshaped for contemporary audiences.

1. World Setting: Cosmic Myth vs. Fantasy World

In The Endless Myth, the universe is structured through myth.
Gods, belief, and narrative define the order of existence.

In That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime, the story begins with reincarnation into a fantasy world.
Magic, monsters, and evolving societies create a structured but flexible setting.

The Endless Myth: the universe itself is mythological.
Slime: a constructed fantasy world shaped by rules and systems.

2. The Protagonist: Symbol vs. Growth

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure tied to the structure of the cosmos.

In contrast, Rimuru Tempest begins as an ordinary human and gradually grows into a powerful being.

Messiah: a mythic figure from the start.
Rimuru: a character who becomes myth-like through growth.

3. The Source of Power: Myth vs. System

In The Endless Myth, power comes from mythological forces.
The universe itself is sustained by divine structure.

In Slime, power is system-based.
Skills, evolution, and clearly defined mechanics shape how characters grow stronger.

This reflects a shift from traditional myth to something closer to a game-like framework.

4. Humanity’s Role: Preserving Meaning vs. Reshaping the World

In The Endless Myth, humans preserve meaning through storytelling.
They maintain the universe by continuing its myths.

In Slime, the protagonist actively reshapes the world.
Rimuru builds a nation, forms alliances, and creates a new social order.

5. What Is Modern Myth?

This is where the comparison becomes especially interesting.

The Endless Myth resembles classical mythology.
It attempts to explain the universe and existence itself.

That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime represents a modern form of myth.
Themes like reincarnation, progression, companionship, and world-building make myth more personal and experiential.

In other words:

The Endless Myth: myth as explanation.
Slime: myth as experience.

Conclusion: The Evolution of Myth

Both works are connected by the idea of myth, but they express it in different ways:

The Endless Myth: a cosmic myth about the structure of existence.
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime: a modern myth about personal growth and world-building.

One is abstract and universal.
The other is personal and accessible.

Yet they are part of the same continuum.

Humans never stop creating myths.
Only the form changes with time.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon