A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Doctor Who

 

The Endless Myth vs. Doctor Who: Myth and Time in Never-Ending Narratives

The novel The Endless Myth and the iconic British sci-fi series Doctor Who are both works often described as “never-ending stories.” However, the structural reasons behind their continuity differ dramatically.

One is a story sustained by myth and faith. The other is a science fiction epic driven by time travel across history and the cosmos. In this article, we compare The Endless Myth and Doctor Who, examining their world-building, protagonists, and narrative structures shaped by myth and time.

---

World-Building: A Closed Mythic World vs. An Open Temporal Universe

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure defined and stabilised by myth and belief. Myth is not merely folklore—it functions as the very foundation of order. The world continues to exist because myth continues to be told and believed.

In contrast, the universe of Doctor Who is open and fluid. Time and space can be traversed freely. History is not fixed but mutable, with multiple timelines and branching possibilities. Change is not a threat to existence—it is the very condition of it.

• The Endless Myth: A world stabilised by meaning

• Doctor Who: A universe sustained by change

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot truly conclude because if myth were to disappear, the meaning of the world itself would collapse. The narrative survives through reinterpretation and retelling. An ending would signify annihilation.

Doctor Who, on the other hand, continues through regeneration. The Doctor renews their body and personality while retaining continuity of memory and identity. The story does not reset—it evolves.

One persists through repetition of meaning.
The other continues through transformation.

---

Protagonists: Fixity vs. Transformation

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is consumed as a symbol. Positioned at the centre of myth, he is constrained by the role imposed upon him. Being chosen becomes a burden rather than a blessing.

The Doctor in Doctor Who embodies change itself. Though fundamentally the same being, each regeneration produces a new personality and emotional tone. The Doctor is both a symbol and a living demonstration of flux.

• Messiah: An existence fixed by meaning

• The Doctor: An existence sustained by change

---

Gods and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods exist through belief and narrative reinforcement. Divinity is embedded within the structure of the world and dependent upon faith.

In Doctor Who, godlike beings appear frequently, but they are often reframed through science-fictional logic. Transcendence is not primarily an object of worship but something to confront, understand, or challenge.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth raises introspective questions:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Is faith salvation or confinement?

• Is a life bound by meaning truly free?

Doctor Who asks more dynamic, forward-looking questions:

• Can individuals change history?

• Does morality persist across time?

• Can identity survive constant transformation?

---

Conclusion: Preserved Meaning vs. Perpetual Change

The Endless Myth and Doctor Who represent two contrasting models of the never-ending narrative:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A time-travel epic that never ends because change never stops

One survives through retelling.
The other survives through renewal.

Together, they illustrate two fundamentally different answers to the same question:

How does a story avoid ending?

By being believed in forever —
or by changing forever.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Star Trek

 

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Star Trek

Myth and Reason as Two Visions of the Future

The novel The Endless Myth and the iconic science fiction franchise Star Trek both depict humanity and the universe on a grand scale. One is a story centred on myth and faith, while the other is grounded in science, reason, and humanistic ideals. At first glance, they appear to represent opposing worldviews.

Yet both works ask the same fundamental question: what should humanity believe in, and what should guide the world forward? This article compares The Endless Myth and Star Trek, focusing on their worldbuilding, views of humanity, and narrative structures.

---

Worldviews Compared: A World Governed by Myth vs. a Universe Expanded by Reason

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure in which myth and belief function as the foundation of order. Gods exist because they are spoken of, and the world remains stable as long as its myths are maintained. Meaning offers salvation, but it also acts as a constraint.

By contrast, the universe of Star Trek is open and expansive, driven by science and exploration. The unknown is not sacred or forbidden, but something to be understood. Technologies such as warp travel and contact with alien civilisations symbolise humanity’s ability to transcend limits through reason.

• The Endless Myth: a world closed by meaning

• Star Trek: a universe expanded by reason

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing its myths would mean the collapse of the world’s meaning. The story survives by being retold, and the concept of an ending itself is rejected.

Star Trek continues because exploration never ends. The universe always presents new worlds, cultures, and ethical dilemmas. The narrative is sustained not by repetition, but by forward movement.

---

Protagonists and Views of Humanity

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah is consumed as a chosen symbol. His personal will is secondary to the mythic role imposed upon him.

In Star Trek, protagonists such as Kirk, Picard, and Sisko are not symbols but decision-makers. They are not chosen by destiny; they choose, judge, and accept responsibility for their actions.

• Messiah: a bearer of imposed meaning

• Star Trek captains: agents of choice

---

Gods and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods are embedded within the structure of the world and sustained by belief. Faith creates divinity, and divinity defines reality.

In Star Trek, god-like beings such as Q or higher-dimensional entities appear, but they are ultimately subject to dialogue, ethics, and understanding. Transcendence is not worshipped; it is examined and relativised through reason.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth raises inward-looking, existential questions:

• Why do humans need myths?

• Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation?

• Does faith preserve the world, or imprison it?

Star Trek presents forward-looking, humanistic questions:

• Can reason overcome conflict?

• Can diversity coexist peacefully?

• Can progress align with ethics?

---

Conclusion: A World Sustained by Belief and a Universe Driven by Inquiry

The Endless Myth and Star Trek portray two different forms of continuity:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A future that does not end because exploration never stops

The former sustains the world through belief; the latter advances the future through inquiry. Together, they present two enduring human strategies for surviving an uncertain universe.

Myth or reason.
Faith or exploration.

Both are, in their own way, stories that refuse to end.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the Works of Rudy Rucker

 

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and the Works of Rudy Rucker

Infinity Through Myth and Mathematics

The novel The Endless Myth and the body of work by mathematician and science fiction writer Rudy Rucker both place infinity, reality, and world structure at the centre of their narratives. While The Endless Myth depicts a world sustained by myth and belief, Rucker’s fiction explores reality through mathematics, computation, and information theory.

At first glance, these approaches appear fundamentally opposed. Yet both ask the same essential question: why does the world continue to exist at all? This article compares The Endless Myth and Rudy Rucker’s works to examine how myth and mathematics each construct their own versions of infinity.

---

Worldviews Compared: A Myth Closed by Meaning vs. a Universe Expanded by Calculation

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure defined by myth and faith. Gods exist because they are spoken of, and the world remains stable as long as its myths are believed. If meaning collapses, the world itself collapses with it.

In contrast, Rudy Rucker’s novels such as White Light, Software, and Wetware present reality as a mathematical and computational structure. The universe is not fixed; it multiplies, transforms, and reproduces through calculation, recursion, and copying.

• The Endless Myth: a world closed by meaning

• Rucker’s works: a world expanded by computation

---

Approaches to Infinity: Qualitative vs. Mathematical

The infinity depicted in The Endless Myth is qualitative. It arises from the continual retelling of myth. Infinity exists because stories refuse to end. It is sustained by belief itself.

Rucker’s infinity is mathematical and structural. Infinite sets, higher dimensions, and self-referential systems drive the narrative. Infinity is not mystical but something to be explored, tested, and understood.

---

The Human Position: Bearers of Myth vs. Components of a System

In The Endless Myth, humans sustain the world by believing in and retelling its myths. The protagonist, Messiah, is consumed as a symbol; individual freedom is secondary to narrative role.

In Rucker’s fiction, humanity itself is unstable. Consciousness can be copied, personalities can be uploaded, and identity becomes programmable. Humans are not guardians of meaning but elements within a system.

---

God and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods depend on belief and narrative. They do not stand outside the world but are embedded within its structure.

In Rucker’s works, god-like entities resemble mathematical principles or computational limits rather than personalities. Transcendence appears as algorithms, recursion, or logical extremes. God becomes the boundary of computability, not an object of worship.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth raises existential and religious questions:

• Why do humans need myths?

• Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation or imprisonment?

• Does faith protect the world, or restrict it?

Rucker’s fiction poses epistemological and mathematical questions:

• Is reality computable?

• Can consciousness be reduced to information?

• Is infinity comprehensible?

---

Conclusion: Infinity of Meaning vs. Infinity of Structure

The Endless Myth and the works of Rudy Rucker depict two distinct forms of infinity:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning cannot be lost

• A universe that cannot end because its structure continuously reproduces itself

The former survives as long as humans continue to believe and narrate. The latter expands as long as calculation remains possible. Together, they reveal a deeper question: is infinity something we believe in, or something we attempt to understand?

Myth and mathematics. Emotion and logic. Both are endless human strategies for grasping a reality that refuses to be final.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel

 

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Borges’ The Library of Babel

An Infinite World of Stories and a Labyrinth of Meaning

The novel The Endless Myth and Jorge Luis Borges’ short story “The Library of Babel” are works that place infinity and narrative at their core. Although they differ greatly in genre and form, both explore a fundamental question: what does it mean for meaning itself to be endless?

This article compares The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel, focusing on their worldviews, their treatment of infinity, and the role of humanity within those worlds.

---

Worldviews Compared: A Myth Sustained by Speech vs. a Universe Already Written

The world of The Endless Myth exists because myths and beliefs are continually retold. Stories are not fixed; they are revised and reinterpreted. As long as meaning is preserved through narration, the world endures.

By contrast, The Library of Babel depicts a universe that already contains every possible book formed from all combinations of letters. Everything has been written, yet most of it is meaningless. This is not a generative infinity, but a complete and static infinity.

• The Endless Myth: an infinity where meaning is continually created

• The Library of Babel: an infinity where meaning is buried

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing its myths would mean the collapse of the world’s meaning. To stop telling stories is to invite dissolution. The narrative survives by being retold.

The Library of Babel never ends for the opposite reason: nothing new is added. Exploration continues endlessly, but creation does not. There is no conclusion, only repetition, wandering, and despair.

---

The Human Position: Bearers of Myth vs. Seekers of Meaning

In The Endless Myth, humans actively sustain the world. Characters, including the protagonist Messiah, are bound to symbolic roles that give meaning to existence. Humanity is part of the structure that maintains reality.

In The Library of Babel, humans are searchers. They hunt for the one book that explains everything, but most are driven to madness or nihilism. Humans do not sustain the universe; they are overwhelmed by its infinity.

• The Endless Myth: humans create and uphold meaning

• The Library of Babel: humans search for meaning

---

Myth and Books as Symbols

In The Endless Myth, myth is a functional narrative. It shapes society and gains power through belief. When belief weakens, the structure of the world trembles.

In The Library of Babel, books symbolize both ultimate knowledge and ultimate futility. Language itself becomes mythic and is simultaneously stripped of authority. Meaning exists only as possibility, rarely as reality.

---

Philosophical Differences

The Endless Myth asks:

• Why do humans need stories?

• Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation?

• Do myths protect the world, or imprison it?

The Library of Babel asks:

• Does meaning truly exist?

• Can truth be found within infinity?

• Can language fully explain reality?

---

Conclusion: A World Sustained by Speech and an Infinity of Silence

The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel present two opposing forms of endlessness:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A universe that cannot end because meaning is excessive

The former sustains reality through narration; the latter traps humanity within an already-written cosmos. Together, these works reveal how essential, and how dangerous, stories and meaning are to human existence.

To read The Endless Myth is to stand on the side of belief.
To read The Library of Babel is to stand where belief itself is questioned.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

The Library of Babel　Website

**A Comparison Between *The Endless Myth* and *Star Wars***

 

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Star Wars

A Story Bound by Myth vs. a Galactic Saga That Rewrites Myth

The novel The Endless Myth and George Lucas’s legendary film series Star Wars both place mythological structures at the core of their narratives. However, they differ fundamentally in how they relate to myth—and in why their stories continue.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Star Wars by examining their worldviews, protagonists, concepts of fate and free will, and narrative structures.

---

Worldbuilding: A World Ruled by Myth vs. A Galaxy That Borrows Myth

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system in which myth and faith function directly as social order. Myth is not merely a story; it is an institution. People live according to meanings and roles imposed by myth, and questioning it threatens the foundation of the world itself.

In contrast, the Star Wars universe is an expansive galaxy that uses myth as a narrative device rather than a governing system. Concepts such as the Force, prophecy, and the Chosen One exist, but they do not rigidly define reality. Their meanings shift depending on how characters interpret and respond to them.

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot truly end because losing myth would mean losing meaning itself. Myth is constantly rewritten and reinterpreted in order to survive. An ending would not bring salvation—it would create a void.

Star Wars continues because galactic history is passed down through generations. Even when one story concludes, new generations, conflicts, and interpretations emerge. What endures is not a single myth, but the continuous reuse and reimagining of myth.

---

Protagonists Compared: A Symbol Bound by Meaning vs. Heroes Who Choose Their Fate

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, the Messiah, is a figure fixed as a symbol. His personal emotions and choices are overwritten by his mythological role. Being “chosen” is not a blessing—it is a loss of freedom.

The heroes of Star Wars—Luke, Anakin, Rey, and others—may be “chosen,” but they are defined by how they respond to that destiny. The Force may guide them, but the final decision is always theirs.

• The Messiah: A being burdened with imposed meaning

• Star Wars heroes: Individuals who reinterpret and redefine meaning

---

Fate and Free Will

In The Endless Myth, fate is embedded in the mythological structure itself. Free will exists, but only within the boundaries of myth. One may choose, but one cannot escape one’s role.

In Star Wars, prophecy and destiny are present, yet constantly challenged. Characters may fall or resist, submit or rebel. Fate is never fully fixed—it remains unstable and contested.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth asks deeply introspective questions:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Is a life bound by meaning truly just?

• Is salvation necessary—or oppressive?

Star Wars, by contrast, presents a modernized myth that emphasizes:

• Moral choice between good and evil

• The temptation of power

• Hope as something passed down through generations

---

Conclusion: A Story Trapped in Myth vs. A Story That Keeps Using Myth

Although both works are mythic in nature, they move in opposite directions:

• A myth that cannot end because it cannot lose meaning

• A saga that continues by constantly rewriting myth

One remains enclosed within myth; the other endlessly reshapes it. This contrast offers a powerful insight into what myth means in the modern age—and why stories continue to be told.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

**A Comparison Between *The Endless Myth* and Greg Egan’s *Diaspora***

 

The Endless Myth vs. Greg Egan’s Diaspora: A Comparison of Meaning-Bound Worlds and Evolving Intelligence Beyond Meaning

The novel The Endless Myth and Greg Egan’s hard science fiction classic Diaspora both depict realities that extend beyond traditional human limits. However, their philosophical orientations point in nearly opposite directions. One fixes the world through myth and faith, while the other expands it through physics and reason.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Diaspora, focusing on worldbuilding, the nature of subjectivity, and why each narrative refuses to truly end.

---

Worldbuilding Compared: A World Closed by Myth vs. A Universe Opened by Physical Law

The world of The Endless Myth is structured so that myth and belief function as the foundation of order. Myth is not merely a story but an institutional system that explains, assigns meaning to, and stabilizes reality. People understand the world through myth, but that understanding simultaneously becomes a limitation.

By contrast, the universe of Diaspora is constructed entirely through physics and mathematics. The setting extends far beyond human society, populated by informational beings known as polises and intelligences without physical bodies exploring the cosmos. There is no mythic explanation here; the universe is assumed to be fully intelligible.

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because if myth disappears, the meaning of the world collapses. Myth survives through continual reinterpretation and retelling, refusing closure. An ending would signify not salvation, but the erasure of meaning.

The narrative of Diaspora also lacks a definitive endpoint, but for the opposite reason. As long as intelligence continues to evolve and deepen its understanding of the universe, exploration never ceases. Endlessness here signifies progress, not stagnation.

---

Subjectivity: Symbolic Humans vs. Continuously Updated Minds

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, exists primarily as a symbol. Chosen and positioned at the center of myth, he loses individual freedom. What matters is not what he thinks, but what he represents.

In Diaspora, subjectivity is fluid. Minds are copied, branched, merged, and rewritten. Identity is not anchored in symbolic meaning but in information and structure. Being a symbol carries no inherent value.

---

Free Will and Constraint

In The Endless Myth, free will operates only within the boundaries of myth. Choice exists, but it can never fully escape mythic structure. Understanding binds.

In Diaspora, the only true constraints are the laws of physics. Ethics, culture, and even identity are mutable design parameters. Understanding is not a cage, but a path to liberation.

---

Philosophical Divergence

The Endless Myth asks inward, human-centered questions:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Is a life governed by meaning truly just?

• Is salvation actually necessary?

Diaspora poses questions that decenter humanity:

• How far can intelligence evolve?

• Can consciousness transcend physical form?

• Is “humanity” itself essential?

---

Conclusion: A Story That Clings to Meaning vs. A Story That Moves Beyond It

The Endless Myth and Diaspora represent opposing narrative logics:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A cosmic exploration that never ends because understanding never stops

One continues to ask what meaning is. The other moves toward a future where meaning may no longer be required. Together, they clarify the distinct roles myth and hard science fiction play in exploring the limits of storytelling.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and ONE PIECE

 

The Endless Myth vs. ONE PIECE: A Comparison of Myth-Bound Narratives and Endless Adventures in Search of Freedom

The novel The Endless Myth and Eiichiro Oda’s globally renowned manga ONE PIECE are both long-running narratives often described as “stories without an end.” However, the meaning of that endlessness and the direction each story takes are fundamentally different.

This article compares The Endless Myth and ONE PIECE, focusing on differences in worldbuilding, protagonist design, freedom, and narrative structure.

---

Worldbuilding Compared: A World Closed by Myth vs. A World Open to the Sea

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system governed by myth and faith. Myth functions not only as storytelling but as a social institution, binding people to fixed meanings and roles. The world exists because it is continually narrated, and questioning myth threatens the stability of reality itself.

By contrast, the world of ONE PIECE is open to vast oceans and unexplored islands. While authoritarian forces such as the World Government and the Celestial Dragons exist, the world itself remains fluid, constantly reshaped through adventure and discovery.

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing myth would collapse the meaning of the world. Myth survives through reinterpretation and repetition. An ending would not bring salvation, but emptiness.

ONE PIECE continues because adventure itself drives the narrative. The world is filled with unknown lands, and the journey with one’s companions is valued more than reaching a final destination. Forward movement is the story’s purpose.

---

Protagonists in Contrast: A Consumed Symbol vs. The Embodiment of Freedom

Messiah, the protagonist of The Endless Myth, is a chosen figure consumed as a symbol. His personal will and emotions are overwritten by his mythic role. Freedom exists, but only within the boundaries defined by myth.

Monkey D. Luffy, the protagonist of ONE PIECE, embodies freedom itself. Though surrounded by destiny and lineage, he repeatedly rejects submission and chooses to become what he wants to be.

• Messiah: a figure burdened with meaning

• Luffy: a figure who runs past meaning and keeps moving

---

The Treatment of Free Will

In The Endless Myth, free will exists only inside the structure of myth. People may choose, but they can never fully escape their assigned narrative roles.

In ONE PIECE, free will is the core of the story. Defying authority, confronting historical injustice, and choosing one’s own path are presented as moral imperatives. Freedom is dangerous, and that danger gives it value.

---

Ideological Differences

The Endless Myth raises introspective, philosophical questions:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Is a life bound by meaning truly just?

• Is salvation even necessary?

ONE PIECE emphasizes emotional and action-driven values:

• Fighting for freedom

• Trusting one’s companions

• Rejecting injustice with conviction

---

Conclusion: Two Opposite Forms of Endless Storytelling

Although both narratives are vast and ongoing, they represent opposite narrative logics:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must not be lost

• An adventure that never ends because the pursuit of freedom continues

One is a story that keeps questioning itself. The other is a story that keeps moving forward. Together, they show how “endlessness” can serve entirely different purposes in storytelling.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon