2026年3月28日土曜日

Endless Myth vs. Saint Seiya: Next Dimension

— Expanding Multiverse Myth vs. Cyclical Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and Saint Seiya: Next Dimension – The Myth of Hades both explore mythological structures involving gods, humans, and the universe itself.

However, their directions are fundamentally different.
One presents an ever-expanding cosmic mythology, while the other builds a myth that repeats through time and reincarnation.

Here, we compare them through the lenses of myth structure, cosmology, the relationship between gods and humans, the concept of time, and the dynamics of myth.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding vs. Cyclical

Endless Myth is structured as a mythology that continuously expands.
It grows outward into multiverses, omniverses, and beyond, endlessly generating new layers of existence.

In contrast, Saint Seiya: Next Dimension is a cyclical myth.
Past and present intertwine, and the same mythological conflicts reoccur in different forms.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly expanding myth
Next Dimension: endlessly repeating myth

2. Cosmology: Structural Infinity vs. Divine Order

In Endless Myth, the universe is an infinite layered structure.
Divine realms, multidimensional worlds, and parallel existences are integrated into a single vast system.

In Next Dimension, the cosmos is structured around divine authority.
Gods such as Athena and Hades define the order of the universe through their domains and conflicts.

This highlights a key difference:

Endless Myth: the universe is the structure
Next Dimension: the universe is ruled by gods

3. Gods and Humans: Transcendence vs. Representation

In Endless Myth, gods exist as fully transcendent beings.
They operate beyond time, space, and dimensional limits, with humans as only a small part of a larger system.

In Next Dimension, humans actively carry the will of the gods.
The Saints fight as representatives of divine power.

Characters like Pegasus Seiya stand at the center of myth despite being human.

Thus:

Endless Myth: humans are part of the structure
Next Dimension: humans enact the myth

4. Concept of Time: Branching vs. Repeating

Time in Endless Myth is neither linear nor cyclical—it branches infinitely.
Parallel worlds and multiversal divergence define its structure.

In Next Dimension, time is explicitly cyclical.
Past holy wars and present conflicts overlap, forming a repeating historical pattern.

So:

Endless Myth: branching time
Next Dimension: repeating time

5. Movement of Myth: Expansion vs. Convergence

Endless Myth expands outward.
Worlds, entities, and concepts continuously multiply, dispersing the myth across infinite scales.

Next Dimension, however, moves toward convergence.
All conflicts ultimately center on the struggles between gods, bringing the narrative toward a focal point.

6. Nature as Modern Myth

Endless Myth represents a modern cosmic mythology.
It integrates scientific, philosophical, and infinite frameworks into myth-making.

Next Dimension is a re-enactment of classical mythology, particularly influenced by Greek myth.
It reconstructs ancient divine conflicts in a modern narrative form.

Conclusion: Does Myth Expand or Repeat?

Endless Myth and Saint Seiya: Next Dimension present two fundamental movements of myth:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding mythology
Next Dimension: eternally repeating mythology

The former builds myth through expansion.
The latter builds myth through repetition.

And this contrast leads to a central question:

Is myth something that continuously creates new forms—
or something that achieves completion through repetition?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月27日金曜日

Endless Myth vs. 300

— Cosmic Myth vs. Physical Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and the film 300 may appear completely different at first glance.
One is a myth on the scale of the multiverse, while the other is a historical war narrative rooted in ancient times.

Yet both works share a fundamental goal: the reconstruction of myth in a modern form.

Here, we compare them through the lenses of myth structure, scale, physicality, and creative direction.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding Myth vs. Condensed Myth

Endless Myth is a mythology that continuously expands.
Its structure grows outward—multiverse, omniverse, and beyond—turning myth itself into an ever-proliferating system.

In contrast, 300 is a highly condensed myth.
It focuses on a single event, the Battle of Thermopylae, stripping away excess to heighten symbolic intensity.

In short:

Endless Myth: an ever-expanding myth
300: a myth compressed into a single point

2. Cosmology: Infinite Structure vs. Closed Battlefield

In Endless Myth, the universe is layered and infinite.
Reality, divine realms, and multidimensional worlds overlap, forming a narrative-driven cosmos.

By contrast, the world of 300 is extremely closed.
The setting is largely confined to Thermopylae, portrayed almost as if it were the entirety of existence.

This limitation strengthens its mythic power.
Within a restricted space, human beings are transformed into mythic entities.

Here, we see the contrast between “infinity” and “closure.”

3. Role of the Creator: Architect vs. Sculptor

In Endless Myth, the creator acts as an architect of cosmic structure.
Narrative, gods, and concepts are integrated into a vast mythological system.

In 300, director Zack Snyder functions more like a sculptor.
He reshapes historical material into myth through stylized violence, exaggerated bodies, and visual intensity.

In short:

Endless Myth: designs myth
300: carves myth

4. Physicality: Conceptual Gods vs. Embodied Gods

The beings in Endless Myth are conceptual and transcendent.
They manipulate time, space, and dimensions, existing beyond human physicality.

In 300, myth is expressed through the body.
Muscle, wounds, blood, and voice define its world.

Most notably, Leonidas I is portrayed as a mythic hero through physical presence, despite being human.

Thus:

Endless Myth: gods as concepts
300: gods as bodies

5. Power of Myth: Interpreted vs. Experienced

Endless Myth becomes meaningful through interpretation.
Readers engage with its structure, gradually uncovering the logic of its universe.

300, on the other hand, operates through sensation.
It delivers myth as an immediate experience through visuals, sound, and rhythm.

It does not require interpretation to function—it is felt before it is understood.

6. Position as Modern Myth

Endless Myth belongs to the lineage of modern cosmic mythology.
It integrates science, philosophy, and infinity into a new mythological framework.

300 represents a modern reconstruction of heroic myth.
It revives ancient epic traditions through cinematic expression.

Conclusion: Should Myth Expand or Be Reduced?

Endless Myth and 300 present two opposing forms of myth:

Endless Myth: an infinitely expanding cosmic mythology
300: an extremely condensed heroic mythology

The former builds myth through expansion.
The latter builds myth through reduction.

And this contrast leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth gain power by expanding infinitely—
or by being stripped down to its absolute essence?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月26日木曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Jodorowsky's Dune

Completed Myth vs. Unfinished Myth

The novel The Endless Myth and Jodorowsky’s Dune are both attempts to create a cosmic-scale mythology. However, one exists as a completed narrative, while the other remains an unrealized vision.

This contrast makes the comparison especially compelling. One is a myth you can read and experience directly. The other survives as an idea, expanding through imagination rather than a finished form.

This article compares them through their form of myth, their vision of the universe, the role of the creator, and the meaning of being unfinished.

1. The Form of Myth: Finished Work vs. Conceptual Vision

The Endless Myth is a complete narrative.
It presents a structured myth that readers can follow, interpret, and understand.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, on the other hand, was never completed as a film.
Its existence lies in scripts, concept art, and the stories surrounding its production.

The Endless Myth: a finished myth.
Jodorowsky’s Dune: a myth that exists as a concept.

2. The Universe: Narrative Structure vs. Consciousness

In The Endless Myth, the universe is structured through story.
Myth and narrative give shape to existence.

In Jodorowsky’s Dune, the universe is imagined as something more spiritual and consciousness-driven.
The project aimed to transform human awareness, not just tell a story.

This highlights a key contrast: narrative versus consciousness.

3. The Role of the Creator: Storyteller vs. Visionary

In The Endless Myth, the creator functions as a storyteller, presenting a mythological framework for the universe.

In contrast, Alejandro Jodorowsky saw himself less as a conventional director and more as a visionary.
His goal was not just to make a film, but to create an experience that would awaken and transform the audience.

4. Influence: Direct Experience vs. Expanding Legacy

The Endless Myth influences readers through its completed narrative.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, despite never being made, had a wide impact on later science fiction.
Many of the artists involved went on to shape the visual language of future films.

Its influence spread precisely because it remained open and unfinished.

5. The Meaning of Being Unfinished

This is the most important difference.

The Endless Myth, as a finished work, presents a defined universe.
Readers can engage with it as a complete system of meaning.

Jodorowsky’s Dune, by remaining unfinished, retains limitless potential.
It continues to grow in the imagination of those who encounter its ideas.

In this sense, it becomes a myth that never stops expanding.

Conclusion: Should Myth Be Completed?

These two works represent different forms of myth:

The Endless Myth: a completed cosmic narrative.
Jodorowsky’s Dune: an unfinished myth that lives through imagination.

One exists through being told.
The other exists through being imagined.

And this leads to a deeper question:

Does myth gain strength by being completed, or by remaining open and unfinished?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月25日水曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

Cosmic Myth vs. Modern Reincarnation Myth

At first glance, The Endless Myth and That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime seem completely different. One is a philosophical story about the structure of the universe, while the other is an isekai fantasy about a man reborn in another world.

However, when viewed through the lens of mythology, both works reveal surprising similarities.

The Endless Myth presents the universe itself as a myth.
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime represents a form of modern mythology, reshaped for contemporary audiences.

1. World Setting: Cosmic Myth vs. Fantasy World

In The Endless Myth, the universe is structured through myth.
Gods, belief, and narrative define the order of existence.

In That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime, the story begins with reincarnation into a fantasy world.
Magic, monsters, and evolving societies create a structured but flexible setting.

The Endless Myth: the universe itself is mythological.
Slime: a constructed fantasy world shaped by rules and systems.

2. The Protagonist: Symbol vs. Growth

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure tied to the structure of the cosmos.

In contrast, Rimuru Tempest begins as an ordinary human and gradually grows into a powerful being.

Messiah: a mythic figure from the start.
Rimuru: a character who becomes myth-like through growth.

3. The Source of Power: Myth vs. System

In The Endless Myth, power comes from mythological forces.
The universe itself is sustained by divine structure.

In Slime, power is system-based.
Skills, evolution, and clearly defined mechanics shape how characters grow stronger.

This reflects a shift from traditional myth to something closer to a game-like framework.

4. Humanity’s Role: Preserving Meaning vs. Reshaping the World

In The Endless Myth, humans preserve meaning through storytelling.
They maintain the universe by continuing its myths.

In Slime, the protagonist actively reshapes the world.
Rimuru builds a nation, forms alliances, and creates a new social order.

5. What Is Modern Myth?

This is where the comparison becomes especially interesting.

The Endless Myth resembles classical mythology.
It attempts to explain the universe and existence itself.

That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime represents a modern form of myth.
Themes like reincarnation, progression, companionship, and world-building make myth more personal and experiential.

In other words:

The Endless Myth: myth as explanation.
Slime: myth as experience.

Conclusion: The Evolution of Myth

Both works are connected by the idea of myth, but they express it in different ways:

The Endless Myth: a cosmic myth about the structure of existence.
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime: a modern myth about personal growth and world-building.

One is abstract and universal.
The other is personal and accessible.

Yet they are part of the same continuum.

Humans never stop creating myths.
Only the form changes with time.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月24日火曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Solaris

Cosmic Myth vs. the Ocean of Consciousness

The novel The Endless Myth and Solaris—along with its film adaptation, Solaris—both explore the relationship between humanity and the universe. Yet they move in very different directions.

The Endless Myth tries to understand the universe through myth, belief, and narrative.
Solaris confronts the limits of human understanding, presenting a universe that resists interpretation.

This article compares the two works through their view of the cosmos, their approach to the unknown, the question of “whose dream it is,” and the role of humanity.

1. The Universe: Mythic Structure vs. Unknowable Presence

In The Endless Myth, the universe is structured through mythology.
Gods and stories give shape and meaning to existence.

In Solaris, the universe is fundamentally unknowable.
The planet Solaris itself appears to be a sentient ocean that defies human comprehension.

The Endless Myth: a universe that can be understood through myth.
Solaris: a universe that resists understanding.

2. Encountering the Unknown: Dialogue vs. Failure

In The Endless Myth, humans engage with the universe through mythological frameworks.
The unknown becomes something that can be symbolically interpreted.

In Solaris, the attempt to communicate with the unknown fails.
Instead of true contact, the planet produces physical manifestations drawn from human memory.

For the protagonist, Kris Kelvin, this takes the form of his deceased wife, Hari.

3. “Whose Dream Is It?”

One of the central questions in Solaris is: Whose dream is this?

The ocean of Solaris seems to read the human mind and reconstruct memories as physical reality.
This suggests that what the characters experience could be projections of their own unconscious.

At the same time, these manifestations are responses from Solaris itself.

So the question becomes:

Is this the human mind dreaming?
Is it Solaris “dreaming” humanity?
Or is it something in between?

There is no clear answer.

In contrast, The Endless Myth presents a universe shaped by storytelling.
Reality exists because it is told, remembered, and believed.

Here, the world is not a dream, but a narrative.

4. The Film Adaptation: A More Inner Universe

The film adaptation directed by Andrei Tarkovsky shifts the focus even further inward.

Rather than emphasizing scientific mystery, the film explores memory, guilt, and love.
Through long silences and visual imagery, it creates a sense of confronting something beyond understanding.

The final scene is especially striking.
It suggests that the protagonist may not have returned to Earth at all, but is still within Solaris.

This raises the question again:

What is reality? And whose world are we seeing?

5. The Role of Humanity: Storyteller vs. Seeker

In The Endless Myth, humans are storytellers.
They sustain the universe by preserving and passing on myth.

In Solaris, humans are seekers who confront the limits of their own understanding.
They are unable to fully grasp the nature of the universe they encounter.

Conclusion: Between Myth and Dream

Both works explore the universe, but in fundamentally different ways:

The Endless Myth: the universe exists through narrative and myth.
Solaris: the universe appears as something dreamlike and unknowable.

One is a universe that can be told.
The other is a universe that can only be experienced.

And Solaris leaves us with a haunting question:

Is the world we perceive truly reality—or are we living within someone else’s dream?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月23日月曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and the Resident Evil Series

Cosmic Myth vs. Biohazard Horror

The novel The Endless Myth and the Resident Evil series both explore the nature of humanity and the structure of the world. However, they approach these themes from completely different angles.

The Endless Myth is a philosophical narrative that examines the universe through mythology, belief, and cosmic structure.
The Resident Evil series is a survival horror story that depicts the collapse of society caused by viruses and bio-weapons.

This article compares the two works through their world-building, the nature of their threats, the role of humanity, and the essence of fear.

1. World Setting: Mythic Cosmos vs. Collapsing Reality

In The Endless Myth, the universe itself is shaped by myth.
Gods and narratives define the structure of reality.

In Resident Evil, the setting is grounded in a world similar to our own.
However, this reality begins to collapse due to biological disasters and outbreaks.

The Endless Myth: a universe constructed through mythology.
Resident Evil: a realistic world falling apart due to science.

2. The Nature of Threats: Mythological Forces vs. Man-Made Horror

In The Endless Myth, the forces that shape the universe are mythological.
They are vast, abstract, and tied to the structure of existence.

In Resident Evil, the threats are created by humans.
The pharmaceutical corporation Umbrella Corporation develops viruses that mutate living beings into dangerous forms.

3. The Role of Humanity: Keeper of Meaning vs. Survivor

In The Endless Myth, humans sustain the universe by preserving and telling myths.
They are essential to maintaining cosmic meaning.

In Resident Evil, humans are survivors.
Characters like Leon S. Kennedy struggle to stay alive while uncovering the truth behind outbreaks.

The Endless Myth: humans create and maintain meaning.
Resident Evil: humans fight to survive.

4. The Nature of Fear: Existential vs. Physical

In The Endless Myth, fear is existential.
It comes from questioning the nature of the universe and the meaning of existence.

In Resident Evil, fear is physical and immediate.
It is expressed through infected creatures, mutation, and the constant threat of death.

5. The Future of the World

In The Endless Myth, the universe continues as long as myth continues.
Storytelling sustains existence itself.

In Resident Evil, crises repeat over time.
New outbreaks and incidents keep the world in a constant state of instability.

Conclusion: Myth and Science as Two Visions of the World

Both works explore the nature of reality, but from opposite perspectives:

The Endless Myth: the universe is understood through myth and belief.
Resident Evil: the world is shaped and threatened by science and human actions.

One is a cosmic myth about existence.
The other is a cautionary tale about scientific power and its consequences.

Yet both ultimately raise the same question:

Are humans creators of meaning, or creators of destruction?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年3月22日日曜日

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and the Marvel Cinematic Universe

Cosmic Myth vs. Modern Hero Myth

The novel The Endless Myth and the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) both explore humanity and the universe on a grand scale. However, they approach these themes in very different ways.

The Endless Myth is a philosophical narrative that explains the structure of the universe through mythology and belief.
The MCU presents a modern form of mythology through interconnected stories of heroes, blending large-scale conflicts with personal growth.

This article compares the two through their view of the universe, their portrayal of gods, their heroes, and their narrative structure.

1. The Universe: Mythic Cosmos vs. Shared Universe

In The Endless Myth, the universe itself is mythological.
Gods, belief, and narrative form the structure of reality.

In the MCU, the key concept is a “shared universe.”
Multiple characters and storylines connect across films, gradually expanding into a larger cosmic narrative.

The Endless Myth: the universe is a mythological system.
MCU: the universe grows through interconnected stories.

2. The Nature of Gods: Absolute vs. Relatable

In The Endless Myth, gods are fundamental and absolute.
They define the structure and meaning of the universe.

In the MCU, god-like beings exist, but they are not absolute.
Characters such as Thor may be called gods, yet they possess emotions, flaws, and personal growth.

3. The Heroes: Symbol vs. Human

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure tied to the cosmic structure of existence.

In the MCU, heroes are deeply human, even when they possess extraordinary abilities.
For example, Tony Stark is both a genius and a flawed individual, and his personal journey is central to the story.

Messiah: a cosmic symbol.
MCU heroes: human figures with growth and conflict.

4. Conflict: Mythic Structure vs. Moral Complexity

In The Endless Myth, conflict is embedded within a mythological structure.
It reflects the balance and order of the universe.

In the MCU, conflicts are often driven by moral dilemmas.
Villains like Thanos act based on their own logic and beliefs, making the struggle more ethically complex.

5. Narrative Structure: Endless Myth vs. Expanding Saga

The Endless Myth presents an ongoing, almost eternal narrative.
The story itself is part of the universe’s structure.

The MCU builds a long-term saga through multiple films and phases.
Each story contributes to a larger, evolving narrative.

Conclusion: Two Forms of Myth

Both works are deeply mythological, but they express myth in different forms:

The Endless Myth: a myth that explains the universe itself.
MCU: a modern myth built around human heroes.

One is a cosmic myth about existence.
The other is a human-centered myth about identity and responsibility.

Yet both share a common purpose:

to use storytelling as a way to understand the world and our place within it.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon