2026年4月27日月曜日

Endless Myth and The Metabarons

— Bloodline Mythology, Omniversal Structure, and the Expanding Jodoverse —

The novel Endless Myth and The Metabarons are both works of vast cosmic mythology.

At the same time, The Metabarons is one of the central pillars of the universe created by Alejandro Jodorowsky—commonly referred to as the Jodoverse.

One constructs an endlessly expanding omniversal structure,
while the other builds mythology through bloodline, inheritance, and fate.

This article compares them through mythic structure, lineage, and the expanding nature of the Jodoverse.

1. Axis of Myth: Structure vs. Bloodline

Endless Myth defines the universe as structure itself.
Multiverses, dimensional hierarchies, and omniversal layers expand infinitely.

The Metabarons defines the universe through bloodline.
Each generation carries the weight of destiny, violence, and inheritance.

In short:

Endless Myth: universe as structure
Metabarons: universe as bloodline

2. The Jodoverse: A Myth Built Through Connection

The Jodoverse is not a single unified story, but a network of interconnected works, including:

The Incal
Before the Incal
The Metabarons
The Technopriests

Each work functions as a fragment of a larger mythology.

Among them, The Metabarons stands out as a pure bloodline epic,
where lineage itself becomes cosmic destiny.

3. Fate: Open Infinity vs. Closed Destiny

In Endless Myth, existence expands endlessly.
Even fate can branch into multiple possibilities.

In The Metabarons, fate is rigid and absolute.
Violence, duty, and inheritance pass from father to son in a closed cycle.

Thus:

Endless Myth: open, infinite destiny
Metabarons: closed, inherited destiny

4. Characters: Conceptual Beings vs. Tragic Heroes

Characters in Endless Myth often function as conceptual or cosmic entities.
They represent structures of reality itself.

In The Metabarons, characters are tragic, mythic warriors.
They are superhuman, yet defined by loss, trauma, and inheritance.

5. Jodorowsky’s Artistic Vision: Violence and Myth

Alejandro Jodorowsky is known for combining:

Mythic scale storytelling
Physical and psychological intensity
Symbolic imagery
Violence as a spiritual language

The Metabarons represents one of his most extreme expressions of blood-and-myth storytelling.

6. Expansion of Myth: Omniverse vs. Network

Endless Myth expands from within a single system.
The structure itself grows infinitely.

The Jodoverse expands through connection.
Each new work adds another layer to the mythology.

Importantly, the Jodoverse is still expanding today.
It is not a closed canon but an evolving mythological network.

Conclusion: Structure, Bloodline, or Connection?

Endless Myth and The Metabarons present two different foundations of myth:

Endless Myth: myth as infinite structure
Metabarons: myth as bloodline inheritance

And the Jodoverse itself functions as a third model:
myth expanded through interconnected works.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is myth something that exists as structure—
or something that is born through lineage and continuation?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月26日日曜日

Endless Myth and The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel

— Jodorowsky’s Artistic Vision and the Myth of Fragmented Reality —

The novel Endless Myth and The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel both depict realities that go beyond ordinary perception.

At the same time, this work strongly reflects the artistic vision of Alejandro Jodorowsky.

One expands reality through an omniversal structure,
while the other destabilizes reality through the fragmentation of consciousness.

This article compares the two while focusing on Jodorowsky’s artistic approach.

1. Treatment of Reality: Structure vs. Fragmentation

In Endless Myth, reality exists as a structured system.
Multiverses and parallel worlds are clearly defined.

In The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel, reality fragments.
The protagonist’s perception collapses, and multiple realities overlap.

In short:

Endless Myth: reality as structure
Alan Mangel: reality as fragmentation

2. Jodorowsky’s Artistic Vision: Symbolism and Inner Worlds

Alejandro Jodorowsky is known for blending symbolism with psychological and spiritual exploration.

In The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel, this appears as:

A fusion of reality and illusion
A succession of symbolic imagery
A narrative experienced rather than logically explained

This approach connects to his films and works like The Incal.

3. Depiction of Consciousness: Expansion vs. Collapse

In Endless Myth, consciousness expands outward.
Human thought has the potential to become cosmic.

In The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel, consciousness collapses.
The boundaries of the self dissolve, destabilizing reality.

4. Narrative Structure: System vs. Fragments

Endless Myth is built as a structured system.
Multiple layers are organized coherently.

The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel is fragmented.
Scenes and events flow without a single consistent logic.

5. Form of Myth: Cosmic vs. Internal

Endless Myth is a cosmic mythology.

The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel is an internal mythology.
The individual psyche itself becomes the myth.

6. Art and Myth: Understanding vs. Experience

Endless Myth invites understanding through structure.

Jodorowsky’s work invites direct experience.
It does not explain meaning—it confronts the audience with it.

Conclusion: Is Reality Structure or Experience?

Endless Myth and The Strange Tale of Alan Mangel present two approaches to reality and myth:

Endless Myth: reality exists as a structure
Alan Mangel: reality collapses as an experience

The former systematizes the universe.
The latter deconstructs reality itself.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is reality something to be understood—
or something to be directly experienced?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月25日土曜日

Endless Myth and Final Incal

— Endings, Expansion, and the Ever-Growing Jodoverse —

The novel Endless Myth and Final Incal both belong to large-scale cosmic mythologies.

Yet their core ideas move in different directions.

One is a mythology designed to never end,
while the other carries the word “final” yet remains only a part of an ever-expanding universe.

This article compares their approaches to endings, expansion, and the future of the Jodoverse.

1. The Meaning of an Ending: Endless vs. “Final”

Endless Myth is, by definition, without an ending.
Its structure is built on continuous expansion.

Final Incal, despite its title, does not represent a true conclusion.
It exists within a larger universe that continues beyond it.

In short:

Endless Myth: no ending exists
Final Incal: an ending is suggested, but the universe continues

2. The Continuity of the Jodoverse

The works of Alejandro Jodorowsky—often called the Jodoverse—are not confined to a single narrative.

They include interconnected series such as:

The Incal
Before the Incal
The Metabarons
The Technopriests

Each new work expands the universe further.

Final Incal is not an endpoint,
but a passage within a continuously evolving mythos.

The key point is this:
The Jodoverse is still expanding.

It is not a closed system, but an open mythology that continues to grow.

3. Structure of the Universe: System vs. Connection

Endless Myth constructs its universe as a system.
From multiverses to omniverses and beyond, everything is structurally organized.

The Jodoverse expands through connection.
Different works link together to form a larger whole.

4. Narrative Movement: Infinite Progression vs. Recurrence

Endless Myth assumes endless progression.
The story continues without a final destination.

In Final Incal, themes and motifs recur and transform.
The mythology evolves through repetition and variation.

5. Mode of Expansion: Internal vs. External

Endless Myth expands internally.
Its infinite growth occurs within a single unified structure.

The Jodoverse expands externally.
New works add new layers to the universe.

6. Essence of Myth: Infinity vs. Continuation

Endless Myth presents myth as infinity itself.

The Jodoverse presents myth as continuous expansion.

Conclusion: What Does It Mean for a Myth to End?

Endless Myth and Final Incal offer two perspectives on the idea of endings:

Endless Myth: there is no end
Final Incal: endings exist, but the universe does not end

What matters most is that the Jodoverse continues to grow.
Each new story reshapes and expands its mythology.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is a myth completed when it ends—
or does it truly exist only as long as it continues to expand?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月24日金曜日

Endless Myth and Before the Incal

— The Jodoverse and the Expansion of a Cosmic Mythology —

The novel Endless Myth and Before the Incal both function as parts of much larger mythological frameworks.

At the same time, Before the Incal belongs to the expansive universe created by Alejandro Jodorowsky—often referred to as the Jodoverse.

One presents an omniversal structure that expands infinitely within itself,
while the other builds a shared universe across multiple interconnected works.

This article explores their differences, with a focus on the Jodoverse and the expansion of cosmic storytelling.

1. Scale of Myth: Omniverse vs. Jodoverse

Endless Myth is designed from the beginning as an infinite omniversal structure.
It includes multiverses, higher-order systems, and realms beyond them.

Before the Incal exists as part of a broader network of works, including:

The Incal
The Metabarons
The Technopriests

Together, these works form a connected universe.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinite structure within a single expanding system
Before the Incal: universe formed through multiple works

2. The Jodoverse: A Connected Mythology

Jodorowsky’s universe does not exist within a single story.

Instead, it is built through:

Narrative connections
Recurring characters
Shared worldbuilding

Each work functions as a fragment of a larger myth.

In contrast, Endless Myth expands internally—
its side stories and records are part of one unified structure.

3. Cosmology: Symbolic vs. Structural

In Before the Incal, the universe is symbolic.
It blends psychology, society, and spirituality.

In Endless Myth, the universe is structural.
Dimensions, realities, and entities are organized hierarchically.

4. Protagonist and Perspective: Individual vs. Cosmic

Before the Incal follows a single character, John Difool.
The universe is revealed through his personal journey.

Endless Myth moves beyond the individual.
It presents the cosmos itself as the subject.

5. Method of Expansion: Narrative vs. System

Jodorowsky expands his universe by creating more stories.
Each narrative adds a new layer to the whole.

Endless Myth expands through its system.
The structure itself continues to grow.

6. Essence of Myth: Fragments vs. Infinity

Before the Incal builds mythology through fragments.

Endless Myth presents mythology as an infinite system.

Conclusion: Is the Universe Built or Already Infinite?

Endless Myth and Before the Incal represent two different models of cosmic mythology:

Endless Myth: infinite from the beginning
Before the Incal: constructed through connection

The former assumes an endless structure from the start.
The latter becomes a universe through accumulation.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is the universe something that always exists—
or something that emerges as stories connect and expand?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月23日木曜日

Endless Myth and The Incal

— Cosmic Myth, Transformation of Consciousness, and the Vision of Jodorowsky —

The novel Endless Myth and The Incal are both works that aim to construct mythology on a cosmic scale.

At the same time, The Incal is deeply shaped by the vision of Alejandro Jodorowsky.

One expands endlessly into an omniversal structure,
while the other focuses on the transformation of human consciousness within a symbolic universe.

This article compares them through cosmology, consciousness, narrative structure, and the creator’s vision.

1. Form of Myth: Structural Infinity vs. Symbolic Myth

Endless Myth is built as an infinitely expanding structure.
It extends through multiverses, omniverses, and beyond.

The Incal constructs myth through symbols and imagery.
Light and darkness, spirit and matter—these oppositions form its core.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth as structure
The Incal: myth as symbol

2. Cosmology: System vs. Psychic Universe

In Endless Myth, the universe is hierarchically structured.

In The Incal, the universe is both physical and psychological.
It functions as a space of consciousness as much as a material cosmos.

Thus:

Endless Myth: systematized cosmos
The Incal: universe of consciousness

3. Consciousness and Transformation

At the center of The Incal is the transformation of consciousness.
The protagonist undergoes a spiritual evolution through the journey.

In Endless Myth, consciousness expands outward.
Thoughts and emotions themselves can become universes.

4. Narrative Structure: Linear vs. Multilayered

The Incal largely follows a linear narrative.
Events unfold in a sequence of progression and transformation.

Endless Myth operates as a multilayered structure.
Different timelines and dimensions coexist simultaneously.

5. The Vision of Jodorowsky

Alejandro Jodorowsky is not merely a storyteller,
but a creator who seeks to transform the audience’s consciousness.

The Incal is designed as an experiential work,
inviting readers into a psychological and symbolic journey.

This vision also connects to his unrealized Dune project,
which aimed to reshape perception itself.

In contrast, Endless Myth expands perception by presenting the structure of the cosmos itself.

6. Essence of Myth: Experience vs. Structure

The Incal presents myth as experience.

Endless Myth presents myth as structure.

Conclusion: Does Myth Exist Within or Beyond?

Endless Myth and The Incal represent two directions of mythology:

Endless Myth: myth as the universe itself
The Incal: myth as consciousness

The former expands outward into infinite space.
The latter turns inward into the depths of the mind.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth exist in the outer cosmos—
or within human consciousness itself?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月22日水曜日

Endless Myth and 2001: A Space Odyssey

— Human Evolution, the Edge of the Universe, and Higher-Dimensional Beings —

The novel Endless Myth and 2001: A Space Odyssey (directed by Stanley Kubrick) both confront fundamental questions: What is humanity? What lies at the edge of the universe?

Both works also depict human evolution in relation to higher-dimensional or transcendent beings.

This article compares them through the lenses of evolution, the limits of the universe, and higher-dimensional existence.

1. Human Evolution: Guided vs. Inherent

In 2001: A Space Odyssey, human evolution is triggered by external intervention.
The Monolith acts as a catalyst, pushing humanity forward.

In Endless Myth, evolution is embedded within the structure itself.
Human consciousness and existence contain the potential to expand into the universe.

In short:

2001: evolution through external guidance
Endless Myth: evolution from within

2. The Edge of the Universe: Destination vs. Endless Expansion

In 2001: A Space Odyssey, the edge of the universe is something to be reached.
Through the Stargate, humanity is guided into an unknown realm.

In Endless Myth, there is no final boundary.
The multiverse expands into omniverses and beyond without limit.

Thus:

2001: the edge as a destination
Endless Myth: no edge, only expansion

3. Higher-Dimensional Beings: Intervention vs. Structure

In 2001: A Space Odyssey, higher-dimensional beings never appear directly.
They influence humanity through the Monolith.

In Endless Myth, higher-dimensional beings are part of the structure itself.
Gods, devils, and other entities operate across dimensions.

4. Transformation of Perception: Beyond Understanding vs. Expansion of Understanding

In the latter half of 2001, human perception is overwhelmed.
The Stargate sequence represents an experience beyond comprehension.

In Endless Myth, perception expands.
Humans gain the ability to understand—and even interact with—higher-dimensional structures.

5. Final Form of Humanity: Star Child vs. Omniversal Existence

At the end of 2001: A Space Odyssey, humanity evolves into the Star Child,
a new stage of existence.

In Endless Myth, humanity may evolve into something far more expansive—
becoming part of the universe itself.

In short:

2001: evolved individual being
Endless Myth: existence as cosmos

6. Essence of Myth: Arrival vs. Expansion

2001: A Space Odyssey presents myth as a journey toward the unknown.

Endless Myth presents myth as endless expansion.

Conclusion: What Lies Beyond Evolution?

Endless Myth and 2001: A Space Odyssey offer two visions of human evolution:

Endless Myth: evolution as infinite expansion
2001: evolution as arrival at the unknown

The former continues without end.
The latter reaches a transformative threshold.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Where is human evolution ultimately heading—
toward an endpoint, or toward infinity?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月21日火曜日

Endless Myth and Inland Empire

— Film-Within-a-Film and the Expression of Infinite Possibilities —

The novel Endless Myth and Inland Empire (directed by David Lynch) both explore infinite possibility and the fragmentation of reality.

At the same time, Inland Empire can be seen as an evolution of the narrative techniques introduced in Mulholland Drive.

This article focuses on three key aspects: the film-within-a-film structure, the depiction of infinite possibilities, and the evolution of Lynch’s narrative method.

1. Narrative Structure: Structured Infinity vs. Collapsing Structure

Endless Myth is built as a layered, structured system.
Multiverses, parallel worlds, and higher-order realms coexist within an organized framework.

Inland Empire, however, dissolves structure itself.

Film within a film
Blurring of role and identity
Disruptions of time and space

These elements merge without clear boundaries.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinity as structure
Inland Empire: infinity as collapse

2. Film-Within-a-Film: The Disappearance of Boundaries

At the core of Inland Empire is the film-within-a-film device.

The protagonist acts in a film,
but gradually loses the distinction between performance and reality.

Is this a scene being filmed, or real life?
Is she the character, or herself?

These boundaries completely dissolve.

In Endless Myth, narrative and cosmic structure merge as well,
but the relationship remains structurally coherent.

3. Expression of Possibility: Infinite Branches vs. Infinite Fragments

In Endless Myth, possibilities exist as fully realized parallel worlds.
Each branch becomes an independent reality.

In Inland Empire, possibilities appear as fragments:

Repeated scenes
Alternate versions of events
Disconnected timelines

These fragments accumulate, creating the sensation of infinite possibilities without a stable framework.

4. Evolution from Mulholland Drive

In Mulholland Drive, Lynch introduced:

A split between two narrative halves
Ambiguity between dream and reality
Multiple possible interpretations

In Inland Empire, this approach evolves further:

Not just division, but endless branching
Not just ambiguity, but total instability
Not structure, but continuous flow

Thus:

Mulholland Drive: fragmented narrative
Inland Empire: continuously collapsing narrative

5. Role of the Audience: Interpretation vs. Experience

In Endless Myth, the reader seeks to understand the structure.

In Inland Empire, the viewer is pushed beyond interpretation.
Rather than decoding meaning, the viewer experiences a stream of fragments.

6. Essence of Myth: System vs. Chaos

Endless Myth presents infinity as a system.

Inland Empire presents infinity as chaos—
something to be felt rather than understood.

Conclusion: Is Infinity Structure or Experience?

Endless Myth and Inland Empire offer two radically different approaches to infinite possibility:

Endless Myth: infinity as structured system
Inland Empire: infinity as lived experience

The former organizes infinity into a coherent framework.
The latter dissolves structure and immerses the viewer in it.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is infinity something that can be understood—
or is it something that can only be experienced?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon