2026年4月19日日曜日

Endless Myth and Flatland (2007)

— Rethinking the Nature of Dimensions —

The novel Endless Myth and Flatland: The Movie both explore the concept of dimension, yet they approach it in fundamentally different ways.

One presents dimensions as part of an omniversal structure beyond comprehension,
while the other uses a simple narrative—moving from two dimensions to three—to make the idea of dimension understandable.

This article takes a deeper look at what “dimension” really means through their comparison.

1. Starting Point: Dimension as Structure vs. Dimension as Perception

In Endless Myth, dimensions are part of an existing structure.
Multiverses, higher dimensions, and even realms beyond dimensions are assumed from the outset.

In Flatland, dimension is treated as a problem of perception.
Beings in a two-dimensional world cannot comprehend the third dimension.

In short:

Endless Myth: dimension as structure
Flatland: dimension as limitation of perception

2. Perspective: External View vs. Internal Awakening

Endless Myth adopts a panoramic perspective.
The reader observes multiple dimensions simultaneously.

Flatland is told from within.
A two-dimensional being gradually comes to understand a higher dimension.

Thus:

Endless Myth: external, omniscient perspective
Flatland: internal realization

3. The Barrier of Dimensions: Crossing vs. Comprehending

In Endless Myth, dimensions can be crossed.
Entities move between layers, interfere, and reconstruct reality.

In Flatland, the barrier is cognitive.
The third dimension is not just unreachable—it is unimaginable.

This distinction is crucial.

4. Expansion of Dimensions: Infinity vs. One Step

Endless Myth expands dimensions infinitely.
3D, 4D, and beyond without end.

Flatland focuses on a single leap:
from 2D to 3D.

Yet that single step represents a revolutionary shift in understanding.

5. Mathematics and Myth

Flatland translates mathematical ideas into narrative.
It turns abstraction into experience.

Endless Myth goes even further—
into realms where mathematics itself collapses.

It explores what lies beyond dimensional logic.

6. Essence of Myth: Understanding vs. Transcendence

Endless Myth is a myth of transcendence—
moving beyond dimensions.

Flatland is a myth of understanding—
grasping what dimensions mean.

Conclusion: Can Dimensions Be Understood, or Only Transcended?

Endless Myth and Flatland present two contrasting approaches to dimensions:

Endless Myth: transcend dimensions
Flatland: understand dimensions

The former moves endlessly into the unknown.
The latter reveals the limits of perception through a single breakthrough.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Are dimensions something we can truly understand—
or do they only exist beyond the limits of our comprehension?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月18日土曜日

Endless Myth and A Wild Last Boss Appeared!

— Different Approaches to the Omniverse and Narrative Structure —

The novel Endless Myth and A Wild Last Boss Appeared! both explore large-scale worlds, yet their approaches are fundamentally different.

One treats the omniverse as a structural foundation, while the other gradually expands toward that scale through storytelling.

This article compares their approaches to the omniverse, methods of depiction, and narrative structures.

1. Approach to the Omniverse: Premise vs. Destination

Endless Myth begins with an omniversal structure as its premise.
Multiverses, higher-order realities, and external domains are part of its initial design.

A Wild Last Boss Appeared! starts from a single world and expands outward.
Its scale grows progressively as the story unfolds.

In short:

Endless Myth: omniverse as premise
Wild Last Boss: omniverse as destination

2. Method of Depiction: Structural Presentation vs. Gradual Revelation

In Endless Myth, the structure of the universe is presented directly.
Readers are immediately confronted with its immense scale.

In A Wild Last Boss Appeared!, information is revealed step by step.
The world expands alongside the reader’s understanding.

Thus:

Endless Myth: structural presentation
Wild Last Boss: discovery-based expansion

3. Narrative Structure: Nonlinear vs. RPG Progression

Endless Myth employs a nonlinear structure.
Multiple layers of time and reality coexist simultaneously.

A Wild Last Boss Appeared! follows an RPG-like progression:

Encounters with powerful enemies
Reunions with allies
Gradual uncovering of the world’s truth

This creates a clear sense of progression and escalation.

4. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Evolving Beings

Characters in Endless Myth often embody abstract concepts or cosmic roles.

In A Wild Last Boss Appeared!, characters grow and evolve.
Their roles and relationships change as the story progresses.

5. Handling of Scale: Infinity vs. Expansion

Endless Myth operates at maximum scale from the beginning.
Infinity is its baseline.

A Wild Last Boss Appeared! expands its scale over time.
Readers gradually come to understand the full scope of the world.

6. Essence of Myth: Ontology vs. Narrative Experience

Endless Myth presents myth as ontology—
the nature of existence itself.

A Wild Last Boss Appeared! maintains narrative engagement while reaching mythic scale.
It balances storytelling with expansion.

Conclusion: Is the Omniverse a Starting Point or a Destination?

Endless Myth and A Wild Last Boss Appeared! represent two distinct approaches to the omniverse:

Endless Myth: omniverse as a starting point
Wild Last Boss: omniverse as an endpoint

The former exists within infinity from the beginning.
The latter arrives there through narrative progression.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is the omniverse something that exists from the start—
or something discovered through the journey of a story?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月17日金曜日

Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XV

— Inherited Media Mix and the Unfinished Narrative —

The novel Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XV may seem very different on the surface.

However, both can be meaningfully compared through three key aspects:
large-scale conceptual expansion, inherited media mix strategies, and narrative completeness.

One is an endlessly expanding mythology, while the other is a project shaped through a long and complex development history.

This article focuses on the inheritance of media mix, its drawbacks, and the idea of an unfinished story.

1. Origins: Infinite Myth vs. Transforming Project

Endless Myth is built from the beginning as an infinite structure.
Expansion is not a side effect—it is the foundation.

Final Fantasy XV originated as
Final Fantasy Versus XIII,
part of the larger
Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy.

Over time, the project underwent major changes and was eventually restructured into Final Fantasy XV.

2. Inherited Media Mix

Final Fantasy XV inherits the media mix strategy established by Final Fantasy XIII.

Its story is spread across multiple formats:

The film Kingsglaive: Final Fantasy XV
The anime Brotherhood: Final Fantasy XV
DLC episodes and later novelizations

As a result, the narrative does not fully exist within the game alone.

Endless Myth also expands across multiple formats:

Main narrative
Side stories
Observational logs (X Documents, WhatsApp records)

However, in Endless Myth, this expansion is structurally intentional and integrated into the work itself.

3. Development Time: Twelve Years of Transformation

The development of Final Fantasy XV, including its earlier form, spanned roughly 12 years.

This prolonged production involved:

Technological changes
Shifts in development teams
Revisions of core concepts

These factors significantly affected the consistency of the final work.

In contrast, Endless Myth treats the passage of time itself as part of its expansion.

4. The Drawback: Fragmentation of Narrative

This is the most critical issue.

In Final Fantasy XV, the distribution of the story across multiple media resulted in:

Incomplete understanding when playing only the game
Missing character development
Key events occurring outside the main medium

This creates a fragmented narrative experience.

5. The Unfinished Story

Final Fantasy XV does not present a fully complete narrative within the game itself.

Canceled DLC and later novel adaptations attempted to fill in missing elements,
but the original vision was never fully realized.

Thus:

FFXV: an unintentionally unfinished story

In contrast:

Endless Myth: a narrative designed to be unfinished

6. Essence of Myth: Design vs. Transformation

Endless Myth is designed as an infinite structure from the outset.

Final Fantasy XV is a work transformed through long-term development and shifting direction.

In short:

Endless Myth: expansion by design
FFXV: structure shaped through change

Conclusion: Is Incompleteness a Failure or a Possibility?

Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XV present two different meanings of incompleteness:

Endless Myth: incompleteness as structure
FFXV: incompleteness as outcome

The former embraces incompleteness as its foundation.
The latter arrives at it through circumstance.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Should a story strive for completeness—
or can incompleteness itself hold meaning and potential?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月16日木曜日

Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XIII

— Expanding Media Mixes and Their Byproducts —

The novel Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XIII belong to very different mediums.

However, both are connected through a shared phenomenon: the expansion of a massive conceptual project and the byproducts that emerge from it.

One is an endlessly expanding personal mythology, while the other is a large-scale media mix project developed across multiple works.

This article compares them with a focus on expansion and its consequences.

1. Scale of Concept: Personal Myth vs. Project Myth

Endless Myth expands from a single core idea into an infinite structure—
multiverses, omniverses, and beyond.

Final Fantasy XIII was conceived as part of the larger project
Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy.

This was not a single story, but a shared mythological framework across multiple titles.

In short:

Endless Myth: internally expanding mythology
FFXIII: externally expanding project mythology

2. Worldbuilding: Structural Cosmos vs. Shared Myth System

In Endless Myth, the structure itself is the world.

In Final Fantasy XIII, concepts such as fal’Cie, l’Cie, and divine entities are shared across multiple entries.
Each title contributes to a larger myth system.

Thus:

Endless Myth: structure as world
FFXIII: shared mythological system

3. Media Mix Expansion

Final Fantasy XIII expanded through multiple sequels and related works:

Final Fantasy XIII-2
Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII

Each entry added layers to the overarching mythology.

Endless Myth also expands across multiple formats:

Main narrative
Side stories
Observational logs (X Documents, WhatsApp records)

Both works demonstrate how a single concept can evolve into a network of interconnected narratives.

4. Byproducts of Expansion

This is the most critical point.

Large-scale expansion inevitably produces side effects.

In Final Fantasy XIII, these included:

Increasingly complex terminology
Difficulty in understanding the full setting
Dependence on multiple works for clarity

This results in a fragmentation of understanding.

In Endless Myth, similar tendencies can emerge:

Infinite expansion of concepts
Overgrowth of abstract systems
Scale exceeding reader comprehension

5. Operation of Myth: Distribution vs. Proliferation

Final Fantasy XIII distributes its mythology across multiple works.

Endless Myth allows mythology to proliferate and expand continuously.

In short:

FFXIII: distributed myth
Endless Myth: proliferating myth

6. Essence of Expansion: Control vs. Overflow

Final Fantasy XIII represents an attempt to manage and control a massive concept.

Endless Myth includes the possibility of expansion beyond control.

Thus:

FFXIII: controlled expansion
Endless Myth: expansion beyond control

Conclusion: Is Expansion a Success or a Side Effect?

Endless Myth and Final Fantasy XIII reveal the dual nature of large-scale storytelling:

Endless Myth: pure expansion toward infinity
FFXIII: expansion producing complexity and byproducts

Expansion creates new possibilities, but also introduces instability and fragmentation.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

How far should a story expand—
and are its byproducts a form of evolution, or distortion?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月15日水曜日

Endless Myth and A Perfect Vacuum

— The Omniverse as Narrative vs. the Universe of Nonexistent Books —

The novel Endless Myth and A Perfect Vacuum by Stanisław Lem may seem completely different at first glance.

One is an ever-expanding omniversal mythology, while the other is a collection of reviews of books that do not exist.

Yet both are deeply connected through a shared idea: the possibility that narrative itself becomes a universe.

This article compares them from the perspective of the omniverse.

1. Form of Myth: Existing Narrative vs. Nonexistent Narrative

Endless Myth is a narrative that actually unfolds.
It expands through multiverses, omniverses, and even beyond.

A Perfect Vacuum consists of reviews of books that were never written.
The stories themselves do not exist—only their descriptions do.

In short:

Endless Myth: an unfolding omniverse
A Perfect Vacuum: an omniverse of nonexistent narratives

2. Worldview: Constructed Universe vs. Imagined Universe

In Endless Myth, the universe is explicitly constructed.
The reader experiences its structure directly.

In A Perfect Vacuum, the universe is never directly shown.
Through reviews, countless possible worlds emerge in the reader’s imagination.

Thus:

Endless Myth: presented universe
A Perfect Vacuum: imagined universe

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Absent Beings

Characters in Endless Myth embody elements of cosmic structure.

In A Perfect Vacuum, characters may not appear at all.
They exist only as references within nonexistent works.

This absence paradoxically generates infinite possibilities.

4. The Omniverse Concept: Reality vs. Potential

In Endless Myth, the omniverse is a structured reality.
Infinite layers of existence are actively constructed.

In A Perfect Vacuum, the omniverse exists as potential.
Every unwritten story becomes a possible universe.

5. Meta Structure: Beyond the Narrative

A Perfect Vacuum is fundamentally meta.
Its format—reviews of nonexistent books—is itself the subject.

Endless Myth also enters a meta dimension,
as the narrative itself becomes part of the cosmic structure it describes.

6. Essence of Myth: Presence vs. Absence

Endless Myth presents myth as presence—
a constructed, existing system.

A Perfect Vacuum presents myth as absence—
where what is not told creates infinite space for imagination.

Conclusion: Must a Story Exist to Be Infinite?

Endless Myth and A Perfect Vacuum offer two radically different approaches to the omniverse:

Endless Myth: infinity through existence
A Perfect Vacuum: infinity through nonexistence

The former builds an actual universe.
The latter allows infinite universes to emerge through absence.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does a story need to exist to become infinite—
or does true infinity lie in the stories that are never told?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月14日火曜日

Endless Myth and Hana no Keiji

— Cosmic Myth and the Aesthetics of the “Kabukimono” —

The novel Endless Myth and Hana no Keiji may seem completely different at first glance.

One is a multiversal cosmic mythology, while the other is a historical story centered on the life of a single warrior in the Sengoku era.

Yet both works share a common pursuit: pushing the question of existence to its extreme.

This article compares them through myth structure, character, aesthetics, and the meaning of life itself.

1. Form of Myth: Cosmic Structure vs. Individual Myth

Endless Myth is an infinitely expanding mythology.
The universe itself becomes the narrative.

Hana no Keiji turns an individual life into myth.
Maeda Keiji becomes the embodiment of the story itself.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth of the cosmos
Hana no Keiji: myth of the individual

2. Worldview: Cosmos vs. Historical Reality

Endless Myth operates in an abstract realm of time, space, and infinity.

Hana no Keiji is grounded in historical reality—the Sengoku period.
Yet within that reality, human life is elevated to a mythic level.

Thus:

Endless Myth: abstract universe
Hana no Keiji: myth within reality

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. the Kabukimono

Characters in Endless Myth often embody elements of cosmic structure.

In Hana no Keiji, the protagonist Maeda Keiji represents the ideal of the kabukimono—
a figure who lives outside convention, guided only by personal aesthetics and conviction.

4. Aesthetics: Structure vs. Way of Living

Endless Myth finds beauty in structure.
The infinite system itself becomes an aesthetic.

Hana no Keiji finds beauty in how one lives.
Every action—how one fights, lives, and dies—becomes an expression of style and philosophy.

5. Life and Death: Infinity vs. the Moment

In Endless Myth, existence extends infinitely.
Even death is part of a larger structure.

In Hana no Keiji, life is fleeting.
Its value lies in how intensely that brief moment is lived.

6. Essence of Myth: Existence vs. Resolve

Endless Myth presents existence itself as myth.

Hana no Keiji presents resolve as myth—
the determination of how to live and how to die.

Conclusion: Does Myth Exist in the Cosmos or in Human Life?

Endless Myth and Hana no Keiji represent two extremes of mythology:

Endless Myth: myth as the cosmos itself
Hana no Keiji: myth as human life

The former finds meaning in infinity.
The latter creates meaning within a single fleeting life.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth exist in the vast structure of the universe—
or is it born from the way a human being chooses to live?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月13日月曜日

Endless Myth and The Multiversity

— Infinite Myth vs. Structured Multiverse —

The novel Endless Myth and The Multiversity both explore the idea of the multiverse.

However, they differ fundamentally in how that multiverse is constructed and understood.

One embraces infinity as its foundation, while the other presents a carefully designed and structured multiverse.

This article compares them through the lenses of structure, worldview, characters, and the meaning of the multiverse itself.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Designed Universe

Endless Myth is built upon infinite expansion.
Its multiverse extends endlessly into higher layers of existence.

In The Multiversity, the multiverse is deliberately designed.
Each universe has a defined role and identity, forming a coherent system.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinite hierarchical structure
The Multiversity: structured multiverse

2. Worldview: Unstable Infinity vs. Mapped Reality

In Endless Myth, the universe continuously expands and can even collapse under its own complexity.
It is not meant to be fully understood.

In The Multiversity, the multiverse is mapped and organized.
Readers can grasp its structure and the relationships between worlds.

Thus:

Endless Myth: incomprehensible infinity
The Multiversity: understandable multiverse

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Variations of Heroes

Characters in Endless Myth often embody abstract concepts or cosmic roles.

In The Multiversity, heroes are central.
The same hero appears in different forms across different universes.

In short:

Endless Myth: conceptual beings
The Multiversity: variations of heroes

4. Meta Structure: The Reader and the Story

One of the defining features of The Multiversity is its meta-narrative.
The act of reading itself becomes part of the story.

The relationship between the reader and the narrative is embedded within the structure.

In Endless Myth, the narrative itself becomes a cosmic structure.
The story is not just told—it exists as part of the universe it describes.

5. Meaning of the Multiverse: Narrative Device vs. Ontology

In Endless Myth, the multiverse is not just a setting—it is existence itself.

In The Multiversity, the multiverse functions as a narrative device.
It allows multiple stories and variations to coexist.

6. Essence of Myth: Infinity vs. Organization

Endless Myth presents myth as infinity—limitless and expanding.

The Multiversity represents an attempt to organize and define the multiverse.

Conclusion: Can Infinity Be Understood?

Endless Myth and The Multiversity offer two contrasting approaches to the concept of the multiverse:

Endless Myth: infinity beyond comprehension
The Multiversity: structured and interpretable multiverse

The former presents infinity as it is.
The latter attempts to give it form and meaning.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Can infinity truly be understood—
or is the attempt to understand it itself a limitation?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon