A comparison between the novel The Endless Myth and the manga BLAME!.

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and BLAME! — Mythic Structure and the Infinite City

The novel The Endless Myth and BLAME! both depict “worlds without end.” However, the nature of their infinity is fundamentally different.

One presents a world sustained by myth and belief.
The other portrays a megastructure endlessly expanding due to runaway technology.

This article compares their world-building, protagonists, structural philosophy, and treatment of silence.

---

World Structure: A World Sustained by Meaning vs. A World of Endless Expansion

In The Endless Myth, the world is stabilised by myth. As long as the story is told and believed, order persists. If myth collapses, the world’s foundation erodes. It is a closed structure upheld by meaning.

In BLAME!, the setting is an endlessly expanding artificial megastructure. Order has long since broken down, and humanity is on the brink of extinction. The world overwhelms not through meaning, but through sheer physical scale.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains the world.

• BLAME!: Structure itself expands beyond control.

---

The Protagonists: A Central Symbol vs. A Lone Wanderer

In The Endless Myth, Messiah is a symbolic figure fixed at the centre of a mythic system. He carries a predetermined role that maintains the world’s structure. His existence is inseparable from the narrative framework.

In contrast, Killy in BLAME! is a solitary wanderer searching for humans with the Net Terminal Gene. He is not a symbol but an individual lost within a vast, indifferent environment.

Messiah stands at the centre of meaning.
Killy drifts through a world without a centre.

---

Myth vs. Technology

In The Endless Myth, God exists through faith and functions as the guarantor of order. Myth provides coherence and structure.

In BLAME!, there is no god—only autonomous AI systems and self-propagating architecture. The “absolute” is not divine but mechanical and impersonal.

Mythic order contrasts with technological runaway expansion.
Each work presents a different form of transcendence.

---

Language and Silence

The Endless Myth depends on narration. The act of storytelling sustains reality itself. As long as the myth continues, the world survives.

BLAME! is characterised by minimal dialogue and vast stretches of silence. The world is not explained; it simply exists. Meaning is left for the reader to construct.

• The Endless Myth: Language creates the world.

• BLAME!: Silence envelops the world.

---

Two Forms of Infinity: Internal vs. Spatial

The infinity in The Endless Myth is internal and philosophical. It arises from the continued reinterpretation and preservation of meaning.

The infinity in BLAME! is spatial and architectural. The city grows without limit, dwarfing humanity within its scale.

One is existential infinity.
The other is structural infinity.

---

Conclusion: Endless Narrative vs. Endless Structure

Both The Endless Myth and BLAME! depict worlds that do not end. Yet their foundations differ profoundly:

• A world that collapses if meaning disappears.

• A world that persists and expands regardless of meaning.

The former questions the relationship between humanity and myth.
The latter explores the alienation between humanity and technology.

Through this comparison, we confront a fundamental question:
Is infinity sustained by storytelling—or by mere existence?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison between *The Endless Myth* and the film *Interstellar*

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Interstellar — Where Mythic Time Meets Scientific Time

The novel The Endless Myth and Interstellar both explore themes of time, human survival, and transcendence. Yet their approaches are fundamentally different.

• The Endless Myth is a structural narrative in which the world is sustained by myth and belief.

• Interstellar is a science-fiction epic grounded in physics and cosmology, depicting humanity’s struggle for survival.

This article compares their world-building, treatment of time, protagonists, and concepts of salvation.

---

World Structure: A World Sustained by Meaning vs. A Universe Governed by Physics

In The Endless Myth, reality is stabilised by myth. The world persists because it is narrated and believed. If myth collapses, meaning dissolves—and with it, the foundation of existence.

In contrast, Interstellar presents a universe governed by physical laws such as relativity and gravity. Humanity seeks survival through scientific exploration rather than faith. The structure of the world is mathematical, not mythological.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains the world.

• Interstellar: Physical law governs the universe.

---

The Concept of Time: Cyclical Myth vs. Relativistic Time

Time in The Endless Myth is mythic and cyclical. Events are retold, reinterpreted, and sustained through narrative repetition. Time is embedded within structure rather than measured as a linear progression.

In Interstellar, time is relativistic. Near a black hole, time dilates dramatically, separating parents from children across decades. Time becomes a scientific phenomenon that shapes emotional consequences.

Mythic recurrence contrasts with scientific relativity.
Both works centre on time, yet define it differently.

---

The Protagonists: Bound by Structure vs. Acting by Choice

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure fixed within a mythic system. He carries a predetermined role that limits his freedom. His existence upholds structure.

In contrast, Joseph Cooper in Interstellar is a former pilot and a father. His journey into space is motivated not only by humanity’s survival but by love for his daughter.

Messiah exists for structure.
Cooper acts for family and hope.

---

Divinity and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained through faith. Divinity is integrated into the structure of reality and guarantees order.

In Interstellar, transcendence appears in the form of advanced future humans who manipulate higher dimensions. This “higher power” is not divine in a religious sense but an evolutionary extension of humanity.

Mythic transcendence contrasts with scientific transcendence.
Both suggest perspectives beyond ordinary human experience.

---

Forms of Salvation

In The Endless Myth, salvation lies in the continuation of myth. As long as meaning endures, the world survives.

In Interstellar, salvation emerges from the union of science and love. The decoding of gravitational data, combined with emotional connection across time, enables humanity’s future.

One offers structural salvation.
The other offers salvation through knowledge and human bonds.

---

Conclusion: Between Meaning and Science

Both The Endless Myth and Interstellar depict humanity facing extinction, yet they diverge in philosophical focus:

• One asks why the world exists and how meaning sustains it.

• The other asks how humanity can survive through scientific discovery.

Mythic time and scientific time represent two different ways of confronting the infinite. In comparing these works, we see that whether through belief or physics, the ultimate concern remains the same: the preservation of human hope.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison between The Endless Myth and Devilman

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Devilman — Mythic Structure and Apocalypse

The novel The Endless Myth and Devilman both explore themes of God and the end of the world. However, their narrative directions differ dramatically.

One is a structural story in which the world is sustained by myth and belief.
The other is an apocalyptic tale of demons and humanity, culminating in catastrophic destruction.

This article compares their world-building, protagonists, treatment of divinity, and visions of the end.

---

World Structure: A World Sustained by Meaning vs. A World Driven to Collapse

In The Endless Myth, the world is defined by myth. Order persists because myth is told and believed. If meaning erodes, the world itself begins to destabilise. Apocalypse is conceptual — the collapse of narrative coherence.

In Devilman, the revival of demons triggers societal breakdown. Fear and paranoia divide humanity, and violence spreads uncontrollably. The apocalypse is not abstract; it is brutal and physical.

• The Endless Myth: The world ends when its structure collapses.

• Devilman: The world ends through human fear and violence.

---

The Protagonists: A Fixed Symbol vs. A Torn Existence

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah stands at the centre of a mythic structure. He is chosen, burdened with meaning, and constrained by his role. His identity is inseparable from the system he upholds.

In contrast, the protagonist of Devilman, Akira Fudo, is a human who merges with a demon. He fights to protect humanity while struggling between his human compassion and demonic power.

Messiah is fixed within structure.
Akira is torn between two natures.

---

God and Judgment

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained by faith. Divinity guarantees order and coherence within the world’s structure.

In Devilman, God appears as a distant, judging force. Rather than offering salvation, this divine presence ultimately condemns humanity. Here, God is not a protector but a severe arbiter.

---

Two Forms of Apocalypse

The apocalypse in The Endless Myth is philosophical — a quiet collapse of meaning when myth can no longer sustain reality.

In Devilman, the apocalypse is catastrophic and violent. Humanity is destroyed through war, betrayal, and fear. The end is absolute and tragic.

One presents an existential end.
The other depicts an apocalyptic annihilation.

---

The Central Questions

The Endless Myth asks:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Can a world survive without shared meaning?

Devilman asks:

• Are humans truly good?

• Can love transcend hatred and destruction?

One approaches the end through structure and philosophy.
The other confronts it through emotion, morality, and tragedy.

---

Conclusion: The Collapse of Structure vs. The Collapse of Humanity

Both The Endless Myth and Devilman portray the end of the world, yet their foundations differ:

• A world that ends when mythic structure fails.

• A world that ends when humanity itself collapses.

One is a narrative about meaning.
The other is a narrative about human nature.

Together, they reveal that apocalypse is not merely destruction — it is a question about what it means to be human.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison between *The Endless Myth* and *Everything Everywhere All at Once*

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Everything Everywhere All at Once — Mythic Infinity vs. Multiversal Infinity

The novel The Endless Myth and Everything Everywhere All at Once may at first appear to belong to entirely different genres.
The former is a philosophical narrative built upon mythic structure; the latter is a chaotic, genre-blending science-fiction adventure set across a multiverse.

Yet both works revolve around two shared themes: infinity and the meaning of existence.

This article compares their world structures, protagonists, treatment of infinity, and visions of salvation.

---

World Structure: A Closed Myth vs. An Ever-Branching Multiverse

In The Endless Myth, the world is stabilised by myth and faith. Reality exists because it is narrated and believed. If meaning collapses, existence itself begins to fracture. Infinity is internal — the endless continuation of myth.

In contrast, Everything Everywhere All at Once presents a universe that constantly splits into parallel realities. Every choice generates new worlds. Possibility multiplies without limit.

• The Endless Myth: infinity through cyclical meaning

• Everything Everywhere All at Once: infinity through branching choice

---

The Protagonist’s Position: Symbol vs. Ordinary Individual

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah occupies the structural centre of the narrative. He is less a free individual than a symbolic role. Meaning is imposed upon him; freedom is secondary to the myth he sustains.

By contrast, Evelyn Wang is an ordinary middle-aged woman. She is not chosen by divine structure but thrown into infinite possibilities. Her struggle is not to uphold a cosmic order, but to decide which version of herself to embrace.

Messiah is bound by structure.
Evelyn is torn apart by possibility.

This contrast defines the emotional core of both works.

---

Two Types of Infinity: Qualitative vs. Quantitative

The infinity in The Endless Myth is qualitative.
As long as myth continues to be told and believed, the world endures. Infinity lies in the persistence of meaning.

The infinity in Everything Everywhere All at Once is quantitative.
The number of universes, lives, and outcomes expands endlessly. Infinity lies in accumulation.

Though both depict the infinite, one is inward and structural, the other outward and proliferating.

---

Despair and Salvation

In The Endless Myth, despair emerges when myth begins to erode. The apocalypse is philosophical — the collapse of meaning itself. Salvation lies in retelling and preserving the mythic structure.

In Everything Everywhere All at Once, despair arises from nihilism. When every possibility exists, nothing appears to matter. The void embodied by Jobu Tupaki reflects this overwhelming equivalence of worlds.

Yet the film’s salvation does not come from transcendent power or cosmic design. It comes from a simple, human choice: kindness, connection, love in the present moment.

---

Scale and Emotional Aftermath

The Endless Myth leaves readers with a contemplative weight. Its tone is structural and philosophical.

Everything Everywhere All at Once overwhelms the viewer with absurdity, humour, and emotional intensity, before returning to intimate human tenderness.

Both works confront infinity — but they resolve it differently:

• One insists that meaning sustains the world.

• The other suggests that choice gives life its meaning.

---

Conclusion: What Do We Preserve Within Infinity?

While The Endless Myth and Everything Everywhere All at Once take radically different narrative approaches, both ask the same essential question:

What do we hold onto in an infinite universe?

One answers: myth and meaning.
The other answers: love and choice.

In comparing these works, we see that infinity itself is not the true subject. Rather, it is the human response to infinity that defines the story.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison between *The Endless Myth* and *Legend of the Galactic Heroes*

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes — Mythic Structure vs. Historical Epic

The novel The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes are both grand works that depict the fate of humanity on a vast scale. Yet their narrative directions differ profoundly.

• The Endless Myth is a story of structure, in which the world is sustained by myth and belief.

• Legend of the Galactic Heroes is a story of history, in which politics, war, and ideology shape civilisation.

This article compares their world-building, protagonists, views of power, and concepts of “the end.”

---

World Structure: A Closed Myth vs. A Flowing History

In The Endless Myth, the world is stabilised by myth. Reality persists because it is narrated and believed. If myth collapses, meaning collapses—and with it, the foundation of the world. Time feels cyclical and structurally enclosed.

By contrast, Legend of the Galactic Heroes unfolds across a vast interstellar civilisation divided between autocracy and democracy. History moves forward. Regimes rise and fall. Political change reshapes the galaxy.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains reality.

• Legend of the Galactic Heroes: Politics and history drive change.

---

Protagonists: Symbolic Figure vs. Historical Individuals

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, functions as a symbolic centre of a mythic system. He embodies a role more than a personal ambition. His freedom is secondary to the structure he upholds.

In contrast, the central figures of Legend of the Galactic Heroes—
Reinhard von Lohengramm and
Yang Wen-li—are extraordinary yet fundamentally human.

Reinhard pursues imperial unification through ambition and genius.
Yang defends democracy through scepticism and strategic brilliance.

They are not mythic absolutes but historical actors shaped by ideology and circumstance.

---

God and Power

In The Endless Myth, God occupies the structural centre of existence. Divinity guarantees order and coherence. Faith anchors reality.

In Legend of the Galactic Heroes, there is no absolute deity governing events. Instead, power resides in institutions, political systems, and individual leadership. Emperors and assemblies alike are flawed. Ideals are constrained by human limitations.

• The Endless Myth: Order originates from mythic absolutes.

• Legend of the Galactic Heroes: Order emerges from political systems.

---

The Meaning of “The End”

In The Endless Myth, the end arrives when myth disappears. Apocalypse is philosophical—the death of meaning itself.

In Legend of the Galactic Heroes, endings occur through regime change or the deaths of great figures. Yet history does not cease; it transforms and continues.

One presents an ontological end.
The other portrays historical continuity.

---

Scale and Aftertaste

The Endless Myth leaves readers contemplating existential questions: Why do humans need myth? Can meaning survive without belief?

Legend of the Galactic Heroes challenges readers with political philosophy: Is an ideal state possible? Can democracy or autocracy truly fulfil humanity’s needs?

Both works are epic in scale, yet their directions diverge:

• One is existential and structural.

• The other is historical and political.

---

Conclusion: The Fate of Myth and the Fate of Humanity

Both The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes address the future of humanity. However, they do so from opposite perspectives:

• A narrative that questions the foundations of existence through myth.

• A narrative that examines governance, ideology, and historical change.

One asks why the world exists.
The other asks how humanity should rule itself.

It is this contrast that makes the comparison between these two works so compelling.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion — Mythic Structure and Psychological Apocalypse

The novel The Endless Myth and the anime Neon Genesis Evangelion both explore themes of “God,” “apocalypse,” and the “chosen one.” However, their narrative approaches differ dramatically.

One is a structural myth in which the world is sustained by belief.
The other is a psychological apocalypse centred on the collapse of the self and the Human Instrumentality Project.

This article compares their world-building, protagonists, treatment of divinity, and visions of the end.

---

World Structure: A Closed Mythic System vs. A World in Collapse

In The Endless Myth, the world is defined and stabilised by myth and faith. Order exists because myth is told and retold. Apocalypse is not merely physical destruction—it is the collapse of meaning itself.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, the world moves toward destruction through the arrival of the Angels and the Human Instrumentality Project. The end of the world is both an external catastrophe and an internal psychological breakdown.

• The Endless Myth: The end comes when meaning disappears.

• Evangelion: The end comes through the dissolution of the self.

---

Protagonists: A Fixed Symbol vs. A Conflicted Individual

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure placed at the centre of a mythic system. He is chosen from the outset and defined by his role. His freedom is secondary to structure.

In contrast, the protagonist of Neon Genesis Evangelion, Shinji Ikari, is a deeply conflicted boy who struggles against the very role imposed upon him. He hesitates, retreats, and questions his own worth. The narrative intensely examines his inner turmoil.

• Messiah: A symbol who fulfils a role.

• Shinji Ikari: An individual who suffers under a role.

---

The Nature of God and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained by faith. Divinity is embedded within the world’s structure and becomes fixed through narration.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, godlike entities such as Adam and Lilith appear, but divinity is ambiguous. Religious symbolism blends with scientific language. God is not a stable centre but a concept open to interpretation.

---

Different Visions of Apocalypse

In The Endless Myth, apocalypse occurs when myth is lost. Without narrative continuity, the world loses coherence.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, apocalypse takes the form of Human Instrumentality—an enforced unity in which individuality dissolves. The story questions whether the loss of boundaries between selves is salvation or annihilation.

The former asks how meaning can survive.
The latter asks whether individuality should survive.

---

Why the Stories Do Not Truly End

The Endless Myth continues through reinterpretation. As long as myth can be retold, the structure endures.

Neon Genesis Evangelion has also been repeatedly reconstructed—through the television ending, The End of Evangelion, and the Rebuild film series. The narrative itself becomes an act of reinterpretation, ending and beginning again.

---

Conclusion: Structure vs. Self

The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion present two contrasting forms of apocalypse:

• A world that cannot escape its mythic structure.

• A self that cannot escape its psychological structure.

One is a story about the persistence of meaning.
The other is a story about the fragility of identity.

Both confront the concepts of “God” and “the end,” yet they ultimately explore different dimensions of human existence—structure and consciousness.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison of the Endless Myth and the Genma Wars series

 

A Comparative Study of Th

e Endless Myth and the Genma Wars Series – Mythic Structure and Psychic Apocalypse

The novel The Endless Myth and the legendary science fiction series Genma Wars (originally created by Kazumasa Hirai) both depict humanity’s fate and its confrontation with transcendent forces.

One presents a world sustained by myth and belief.
The other portrays psychic warriors battling a cosmic invader in an apocalyptic struggle.

Although their genres differ, both works share a central question: Why does the world move toward destruction, and how do humans resist it? This article compares their world-building, protagonists, and portrayals of gods and apocalypse.

---

World-Building: A Closed Mythic System vs. An Expanding Cosmic War

In The Endless Myth, the world is structured and stabilised by myth and faith. God stands at the centre, and narrative meaning preserves order. The threat of collapse is not merely physical—it is the collapse of meaning itself.

In contrast, Genma Wars depicts a cosmic-scale invasion by the Genma, overwhelming entities that threaten humanity’s survival. Psychic individuals rise to defend Earth, and the story expands from a terrestrial struggle into a vast interstellar conflict. Here, the apocalypse is literal and destructive.

• The Endless Myth: The world ends when meaning collapses.

• Genma Wars: The world ends through cosmic invasion.

---

Protagonists: A Fixed Symbol vs. An Awakened Youth

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure placed at the centre of a mythic framework. He is chosen from the outset and embedded within the structure of the narrative itself. His freedom is limited by his role.

In Genma Wars, the protagonist Jo Azuma begins as an ordinary boy who awakens to psychic powers. Though chosen by destiny, he struggles, doubts, and grows. His journey is one of inner development alongside increasing power.

• Messiah: A symbol from the beginning.

• Jo Azuma: A youth who grows into symbolic significance.

---

Gods and Transcendent Beings

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained by faith. Divinity guarantees order and exists within the structure of the world.

In Genma Wars, the Genma are not gods sustained by belief but cosmic threats of overwhelming force. Humanity cannot rely on faith alone; it must fight back with psychic strength and unity.

The key distinction lies in perspective:

• A god within mythic order.

• A destructive force invading from beyond.

---

Concepts of Apocalypse

In The Endless Myth, apocalypse is conceptual—the erasure of meaning and narrative coherence. If myth disappears, humanity loses its reason for existence.

In Genma Wars, apocalypse is violent and tangible. Cities fall, lives are lost, and destruction spreads across worlds. The threat is immediate and physical.

Yet both works affirm that humanity is not entirely powerless.

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth persists through reinterpretation. As long as myth can be retold, the story survives.

Genma Wars expands as its enemies and battlefields expand. The scale grows from Earth to the cosmos, sustaining narrative momentum.

• A story prolonged by renewed meaning.

• A story prolonged by escalating conflict.

---

Conclusion: Inner Apocalypse vs. Outer Apocalypse

The Endless Myth and Genma Wars present contrasting visions of the end:

• An internal apocalypse born from the collapse of myth.

• An external apocalypse driven by cosmic invasion.

The former centres on philosophical and structural questions.
The latter thrives on dynamic action and escalating warfare.

Despite their differences, both works depict humanity standing before transcendent forces and striving to resist—whether through meaning or through power.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon