Endless Myth and Mobile Suit Z Gundam

— Kamille Bidan as the Answer to a “New Newtype” and the Expansion of Consciousness —

The novel Endless Myth and Mobile Suit Z Gundam may seem very different in scale and genre.

Yet both works explore a shared question:
How far can human consciousness expand?

In particular, Kamille Bidan represents a redefinition of the Newtype concept—an answer that is both profound and tragic.

This article compares them through Newtype theory, consciousness expansion, and the relationship between humanity and the cosmos.

---

1. The Concept of the Newtype: Evolution or Sensitivity?

In Z Gundam, a Newtype is not simply an evolved human.

Kamille is someone who can deeply feel the emotions—and even the deaths—of others.
This ability is both a gift and a burden.

In Endless Myth, consciousness expands beyond individual sensitivity.
It connects to the structure of the universe itself.

In short:

Z Gundam: Newtype = heightened sensitivity
Endless Myth: consciousness = connection to cosmic structure

---

2. Kamille as an Answer

Kamille Bidan embodies both the ideal and the limit of the Newtype.

He strives to understand others more deeply than anyone else.
Yet this overwhelming sensitivity ultimately leads to his psychological collapse.

This presents a powerful answer to a fundamental question:

Can humans endure complete understanding of others?

In Kamille’s case, the answer is no.

---

3. Expansion of Consciousness: Tragedy vs. Transcendence

In Z Gundam, the expansion of consciousness leads to tragedy.

Newtypes are used as tools in war,
and their abilities become tied to destruction.

In Endless Myth, expansion leads toward transcendence.

Consciousness extends into multiverses and higher-dimensional structures,
approaching an understanding of existence itself.

---

4. Meaning of Space: Battlefield vs. Structure

In Z Gundam, space is a battlefield.
It is where human conflict continues.

In Endless Myth, space is structure.
An infinite system that defines existence.

---

5. Human Limits: Collapse vs. Redefinition

Kamille represents the limits of humanity.
To understand too much is to break.

Endless Myth attempts to go beyond those limits.
It redefines what “human” even means.

---

6. Form of Myth: Human-Centered vs. Cosmic

Z Gundam is fundamentally a human story.

Endless Myth is a cosmic story.

---

Conclusion: How Much Can Humans Understand?

Endless Myth and Z Gundam present two different answers to the expansion of consciousness:

Z Gundam: understanding destroys the human mind
Endless Myth: understanding transcends the human condition

And Kamille stands at the boundary between those two possibilities.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

How much can humans truly understand—
and what lies beyond that limit: collapse, or evolution?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and Solo Leveling

— Omniversal Myth vs. Level-Up Narrative, and the Rise of a New Global Comic Format —

The novel Endless Myth and Solo Leveling both center on the structure of the world and the transformation of individuals.

However, their approaches are fundamentally different.

One expands mythology across an infinite omniverse,
while the other builds its narrative through the “leveling up” of a single protagonist.

At the same time, Solo Leveling represents a turning point in how comics and visual storytelling are created and distributed globally.

This article compares them through structure, narrative mechanics, and global media evolution.

---

1. Scale of Myth: Omniverse vs. Individual Growth

Endless Myth begins at a cosmic scale.
It explores multiverses, higher dimensions, and infinite layered realities.

Solo Leveling begins with an individual.
A weak hunter rises step by step to overwhelming power.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth begins with the universe
Solo Leveling: myth begins with the individual

---

2. World Structure: Philosophical vs. System-Based

The world of Endless Myth is built on complex philosophical structures.

The world of Solo Leveling operates through game-like systems:

• Levels

• Skills

• Quests

These mechanics are embedded directly into reality.

Thus:

Endless Myth: conceptual structure
Solo Leveling: system-driven structure

---

3. Narrative Drive: Understanding vs. Progression

In Endless Myth, the story advances through understanding the structure of existence.

In Solo Leveling, the story advances through progression.
Growth itself is the driving force.

---

4. A New Form of Comics: Webtoon and Global Expansion

One of the defining features of Solo Leveling is its format.

• Vertical scrolling optimized for smartphones

• Full-color presentation

• Fast-paced episodic updates

This webtoon format offers a fundamentally different reading experience from traditional manga.

Moreover, the series achieved global success through:

• Worldwide translations

• Anime adaptation (Solo Leveling)

• Game adaptations and cross-media expansion

It represents a new model of global storytelling.

---

5. The Role of the Protagonist: Central vs. Transcendent

Solo Leveling is centered entirely on its protagonist.
The world evolves around his growth.

Endless Myth moves beyond individual perspective.
The universe itself becomes the subject.

---

6. Form of Myth: Growth Myth vs. Structural Myth

Solo Leveling is a myth of growth.

Endless Myth is a myth of structure.

---

Conclusion: Does Myth Begin with the Individual or the Universe?

Endless Myth and Solo Leveling represent two major forms of modern myth-making:

Endless Myth: infinite myth beginning from the universe
Solo Leveling: growth myth beginning from the individual

At the same time, Solo Leveling demonstrates something equally important:
the form and distribution of storytelling are evolving.

Myth is no longer defined only by its content,
but also by how it reaches a global audience.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Where does a story truly begin—
and how does it expand across the world?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and La Chinoise

— The Destruction and Reconstruction of Narrative Grammar, Godard’s Late Style, and Copyright —

The novel Endless Myth and La Chinoise both challenge conventional storytelling, but in fundamentally different ways.

La Chinoise, directed by Jean-Luc Godard, represents a radical attempt to question the very grammar of cinema.

One expands narrative through an omniversal structure,
while the other dismantles narrative into fragments of image, sound, and text.

This article compares them through narrative disruption, media reconstruction, and Godard’s later evolution—including the issue of copyright.

---

1. Narrative Grammar: Expansion vs. Destruction

Endless Myth expands narrative grammar.
It layers multiple universes, timelines, and dimensions into a new structure.

La Chinoise destroys narrative grammar.
Plot is fragmented into conversations, quotations, and ideological exchanges.

In short:

Endless Myth: expansion of narrative
La Chinoise: deconstruction of narrative

---

2. Reconstruction of Media: Text vs. Image-Sound-Word

Endless Myth constructs its universe through language.

La Chinoise separates and recombines media elements:

• Text appearing on screen

• Discontinuous use of music

• Theatrical, staged performances

It is cinema that goes beyond cinema—
a reconstruction of image, sound, and written word.

---

3. Godard’s Artistic Vision: Redefining Cinema

Jean-Luc Godard spent his entire career redefining what cinema could be.

La Chinoise is an early example of his experimental phase,
but his later works push these ideas even further:

• Fragmentation of images

• Separation of sound and visuals

• Rejection of traditional narrative

In his late period, cinema becomes less a story
and more a collage of audiovisual thought.

---

4. Copyright and Quotation: The Problem of Reconstruction

Godard’s work relies heavily on quotation and reuse.

Existing images, music, and ideas are reassembled
to generate new meanings.

However, this approach raises issues of copyright.

In the modern era, such methods are increasingly restricted,
making Godard-like experimentation more difficult to sustain.

---

5. Form of Myth: Structural Myth vs. Deconstructed Myth

Endless Myth builds mythology through structure.

La Chinoise deconstructs myth.
It questions ideology, language, and representation itself.

---

6. Experience: Understanding vs. Discomfort

Endless Myth invites the reader to understand its structure.

La Chinoise creates discomfort.
It destabilizes the viewer and forces reflection.

---

Conclusion: Is Narrative Necessary?

Endless Myth and La Chinoise ultimately question the necessity of narrative itself:

Endless Myth: narrative expands into new forms
La Chinoise: narrative is dismantled

One builds a universe through structure.
The other breaks storytelling apart to reconstruct meaning.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is narrative essential—
or must it be destroyed to create something new?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and The Midnight Meat Train

— Cosmic Myth vs. Urban Horror, Japanese Directors in Hollywood, and Clive Barker —

The novel Endless Myth and The Midnight Meat Train may appear completely different at first glance.

Yet both works explore a similar idea: the moment when humans encounter something beyond comprehension.

This film is also based on a story by Clive Barker and directed by Ryuhei Kitamura, making it a compelling case of a Japanese director working within Hollywood while adapting a distinct literary vision.

This article compares them through cosmology, horror, authorship, and international filmmaking.

---

1. Scale of the World: Omniverse vs. Underground Myth

Endless Myth presents an infinite omniversal structure.
Multiverses expand endlessly into higher systems.

The Midnight Meat Train presents a hidden myth beneath the city.
In the depths of the subway, something inhuman exists beyond ordinary reality.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinite outer cosmos
Midnight Meat Train: inner, hidden abyss of the city

---

2. Nature of Horror: Structure vs. Physical Violence

In Endless Myth, horror comes from structure itself—
the uncertainty of existence within an infinite system.

In The Midnight Meat Train, horror is physical and visceral.
Violence, flesh, and ritual dominate the narrative.

Yet behind that violence lies something far greater and more unknowable.

---

3. The Influence of Clive Barker

Clive Barker is known for treating horror not merely as fear, but as contact with another realm.

His works often explore:

• Beings beyond human comprehension

• The fusion of beauty and horror

• Transformation of body and mind

The Midnight Meat Train reflects this philosophy—
it is not just a slasher story, but a gateway into the unknown.

---

4. Japanese Directors in Hollywood: The Case of Ryuhei Kitamura

Ryuhei Kitamura built his reputation in Japan with dynamic action and intense visual style.

In this film, he brings that sensibility into Hollywood while adapting Barker’s unique tone.

This highlights a recurring challenge for Japanese directors working abroad:

• How much of their own style can they retain?

• How much must they adapt to the source material and studio system?

The Midnight Meat Train exists at the intersection of these forces.

---

5. Transformation of Perception: Expansion vs. Descent

In Endless Myth, perception expands outward into the cosmos.

In The Midnight Meat Train, perception descends inward—
into the hidden layers beneath everyday reality.

---

6. Form of Myth: Infinite Myth vs. Urban Myth

Endless Myth is an infinite myth.

The Midnight Meat Train is an urban myth—
a hidden narrative embedded within modern society.

---

Conclusion: Is Myth Above Us or Beneath Us?

Endless Myth and The Midnight Meat Train present two opposing locations of myth:

Endless Myth: myth exists in the vast cosmos
Midnight Meat Train: myth exists beneath everyday life

One reaches toward infinity.
The other uncovers darkness below.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is the unknown something far beyond us—
or something already waiting beneath our feet?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and The Sons of El Topo

— Myth Born from Sequel Concepts and the Structure of the Omniverse —

The novel Endless Myth and The Sons of El Topo (often referred to as Fang Solo) are both works that expand mythology beyond an original foundation.

Crucially, The Sons of El Topo is a product of Alejandro Jodorowsky’s unrealized sequel concept to the film El Topo.

One is an omniversal mythology designed to expand infinitely from the outset,
while the other emerges from the continuation of an earlier work—transforming an unfinished vision into a new myth.

This article compares them through sequel logic, mythic structure, and the idea of creative regeneration.

---

1. Point of Origin: Independent Myth vs. Sequel Myth

Endless Myth is constructed as an independent mythological system.
It begins already infinite in scope.

The Sons of El Topo originates from a sequel concept.
It extends the narrative world of El Topo into a new form.

In short:

Endless Myth: independent mythology
Sons of El Topo: mythology born from a sequel

---

2. Jodorowsky’s Creation Method: From the Unfinished to the Mythic

Alejandro Jodorowsky is known for transforming unrealized ideas into new works.

The Sons of El Topo is a clear example:
a film sequel that was never produced becomes a comic narrative instead.

This reflects a broader pattern also seen in his Dune project—
unfinished visions do not disappear, but re-emerge in different forms.

In Jodorowsky’s process:
unrealized ideas are not failures—they are seeds of new mythology.

---

3. Cosmology: Omniverse vs. Spiritual Desert

Endless Myth presents a structured omniverse.
Multiverses expand into higher and higher systems.

The Sons of El Topo presents a symbolic, spiritual landscape.
Deserts, violence, and religious imagery create a psychological cosmos.

It is less a physical universe,
and more a universe of the mind.

---

4. Transmission of Myth: Structure vs. Bloodline

In Endless Myth, mythology continues through structure.
The system itself evolves.

In The Sons of El Topo, mythology continues through lineage.
The legacy of the father passes to the sons.

---

5. Mode of Expansion: Internal vs. Derivative

Endless Myth expands internally.
Its infinite growth occurs within a unified system.

The Sons of El Topo expands through derivation.
A new story emerges from an existing one.

---

6. Essence of Myth: Infinity vs. Regeneration

Endless Myth defines myth as infinity itself.

The Sons of El Topo defines myth as regeneration.
An unfinished idea transforms into a new narrative life.

---

Conclusion: Is Myth Infinite from the Start, or Reborn from Fragments?

Endless Myth and The Sons of El Topo present two models of myth-making:

Endless Myth: myth exists as infinite structure from the beginning
Sons of El Topo: myth is reborn from unfinished visions

What stands out most is Jodorowsky’s ongoing creative process.
His universe continues to expand—not only through completed works,
but through the transformation of unrealized ideas into new forms.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is myth something that always exists in infinite form—
or something that is endlessly reborn from fragments of imagination?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and Castaka

— Origins of Bloodline Mythology, Omniversal Structure, and the Expanding Jodoverse —

The novel Endless Myth and Castaka can both be understood as parts of larger cosmic mythological systems.

At the same time, Castaka occupies a foundational position within the universe created by Alejandro Jodorowsky—the so-called Jodoverse.

One represents an infinite, self-expanding omniversal structure,
while the other represents the origin point of a bloodline mythology that shapes an entire saga.

This article compares them through origin, lineage, cosmic structure, and the ongoing expansion of the Jodoverse.

---

1. Position in Myth: Infinite System vs. Origin Myth

Endless Myth is constructed as an infinite system from the beginning.
It expands through multiverses, higher dimensions, and omniversal layers without limit.

Castaka, however, functions as an origin story.
It depicts the beginning of the lineage that will later become The Metabarons.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth as infinite structure
Castaka: myth as origin point

---

2. The Jodoverse: A Connected Mythological Network

The Jodoverse is not a single work, but a network of interconnected narratives, including:

• The Incal

• Before the Incal

• Castaka

• The Metabarons

• The Technopriests

Within this system, Castaka serves as the genealogical starting point of the Metabaron bloodline.

---

3. Bloodline vs. Structure

In Castaka, mythology is defined through lineage.
The origin of the warrior bloodline establishes a destiny that continues for generations.

In Endless Myth, mythology is defined through structure.
Existence itself expands beyond individuals, families, or even civilizations.

Thus:

Castaka: myth as lineage
Endless Myth: myth as structure

---

4. Scale: Family Saga vs. Cosmic System

Castaka begins at the level of a family.
Yet this family becomes the foundation of an entire cosmic saga.

Endless Myth begins at a cosmic scale.
It never relies on individuals or lineage as its primary framework.

---

5. Jodorowsky’s Artistic Vision: Origin as Myth

Alejandro Jodorowsky is known for transforming origins into mythology.

Castaka is not merely a prequel—it is a mythological genesis.
It turns violence, ritual, and inheritance into sacred narrative material.

This genesis then extends into The Metabarons and beyond, forming part of the larger Jodoverse.

---

6. Expansion of Myth: Beginning vs. Infinity

Endless Myth has no beginning or end—it is infinite by design.

Castaka defines the beginning of a mythological chain.

Yet the Jodoverse continues to expand today,
with each new interpretation or work reshaping its internal mythology.

---

Conclusion: Is Myth Infinite from the Start, or Born from Origins?

Endless Myth and Castaka present two different foundations of mythology:

Endless Myth: myth as pre-existing infinity
Castaka: myth as an origin that generates continuity

And the Jodoverse exists as a third model—
a mythology that continues to expand through connection and reinterpretation.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is myth something that exists infinitely from the beginning—
or something that grows endlessly from its origins?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

 

Endless Myth and The Metabarons

— Bloodline Mythology, Omniversal Structure, and the Expanding Jodoverse —

The novel Endless Myth and The Metabarons are both works of vast cosmic mythology.

At the same time, The Metabarons is one of the central pillars of the universe created by Alejandro Jodorowsky—commonly referred to as the Jodoverse.

One constructs an endlessly expanding omniversal structure,
while the other builds mythology through bloodline, inheritance, and fate.

This article compares them through mythic structure, lineage, and the expanding nature of the Jodoverse.

---

1. Axis of Myth: Structure vs. Bloodline

Endless Myth defines the universe as structure itself.
Multiverses, dimensional hierarchies, and omniversal layers expand infinitely.

The Metabarons defines the universe through bloodline.
Each generation carries the weight of destiny, violence, and inheritance.

In short:

Endless Myth: universe as structure
Metabarons: universe as bloodline

---

2. The Jodoverse: A Myth Built Through Connection

The Jodoverse is not a single unified story, but a network of interconnected works, including:

• The Incal

• Before the Incal

• The Metabarons

• The Technopriests

Each work functions as a fragment of a larger mythology.

Among them, The Metabarons stands out as a pure bloodline epic,
where lineage itself becomes cosmic destiny.

---

3. Fate: Open Infinity vs. Closed Destiny

In Endless Myth, existence expands endlessly.
Even fate can branch into multiple possibilities.

In The Metabarons, fate is rigid and absolute.
Violence, duty, and inheritance pass from father to son in a closed cycle.

Thus:

Endless Myth: open, infinite destiny
Metabarons: closed, inherited destiny

---

4. Characters: Conceptual Beings vs. Tragic Heroes

Characters in Endless Myth often function as conceptual or cosmic entities.
They represent structures of reality itself.

In The Metabarons, characters are tragic, mythic warriors.
They are superhuman, yet defined by loss, trauma, and inheritance.

---

5. Jodorowsky’s Artistic Vision: Violence and Myth

Alejandro Jodorowsky is known for combining:

• Mythic scale storytelling

• Physical and psychological intensity

• Symbolic imagery

• Violence as a spiritual language

The Metabarons represents one of his most extreme expressions of blood-and-myth storytelling.

---

6. Expansion of Myth: Omniverse vs. Network

Endless Myth expands from within a single system.
The structure itself grows infinitely.

The Jodoverse expands through connection.
Each new work adds another layer to the mythology.

Importantly, the Jodoverse is still expanding today.
It is not a closed canon but an evolving mythological network.

---

Conclusion: Structure, Bloodline, or Connection?

Endless Myth and The Metabarons present two different foundations of myth:

Endless Myth: myth as infinite structure
Metabarons: myth as bloodline inheritance

And the Jodoverse itself functions as a third model:
myth expanded through interconnected works.

This comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Is myth something that exists as structure—
or something that is born through lineage and continuation?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon