Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion — Mythic Structure and Psychological Apocalypse

The novel The Endless Myth and the anime Neon Genesis Evangelion both explore themes of “God,” “apocalypse,” and the “chosen one.” However, their narrative approaches differ dramatically.

One is a structural myth in which the world is sustained by belief.
The other is a psychological apocalypse centred on the collapse of the self and the Human Instrumentality Project.

This article compares their world-building, protagonists, treatment of divinity, and visions of the end.

---

World Structure: A Closed Mythic System vs. A World in Collapse

In The Endless Myth, the world is defined and stabilised by myth and faith. Order exists because myth is told and retold. Apocalypse is not merely physical destruction—it is the collapse of meaning itself.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, the world moves toward destruction through the arrival of the Angels and the Human Instrumentality Project. The end of the world is both an external catastrophe and an internal psychological breakdown.

• The Endless Myth: The end comes when meaning disappears.

• Evangelion: The end comes through the dissolution of the self.

---

Protagonists: A Fixed Symbol vs. A Conflicted Individual

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure placed at the centre of a mythic system. He is chosen from the outset and defined by his role. His freedom is secondary to structure.

In contrast, the protagonist of Neon Genesis Evangelion, Shinji Ikari, is a deeply conflicted boy who struggles against the very role imposed upon him. He hesitates, retreats, and questions his own worth. The narrative intensely examines his inner turmoil.

• Messiah: A symbol who fulfils a role.

• Shinji Ikari: An individual who suffers under a role.

---

The Nature of God and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained by faith. Divinity is embedded within the world’s structure and becomes fixed through narration.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, godlike entities such as Adam and Lilith appear, but divinity is ambiguous. Religious symbolism blends with scientific language. God is not a stable centre but a concept open to interpretation.

---

Different Visions of Apocalypse

In The Endless Myth, apocalypse occurs when myth is lost. Without narrative continuity, the world loses coherence.

In Neon Genesis Evangelion, apocalypse takes the form of Human Instrumentality—an enforced unity in which individuality dissolves. The story questions whether the loss of boundaries between selves is salvation or annihilation.

The former asks how meaning can survive.
The latter asks whether individuality should survive.

---

Why the Stories Do Not Truly End

The Endless Myth continues through reinterpretation. As long as myth can be retold, the structure endures.

Neon Genesis Evangelion has also been repeatedly reconstructed—through the television ending, The End of Evangelion, and the Rebuild film series. The narrative itself becomes an act of reinterpretation, ending and beginning again.

---

Conclusion: Structure vs. Self

The Endless Myth and Neon Genesis Evangelion present two contrasting forms of apocalypse:

• A world that cannot escape its mythic structure.

• A self that cannot escape its psychological structure.

One is a story about the persistence of meaning.
The other is a story about the fragility of identity.

Both confront the concepts of “God” and “the end,” yet they ultimately explore different dimensions of human existence—structure and consciousness.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison of the Endless Myth and the Genma Wars series

 

A Comparative Study of Th

e Endless Myth and the Genma Wars Series – Mythic Structure and Psychic Apocalypse

The novel The Endless Myth and the legendary science fiction series Genma Wars (originally created by Kazumasa Hirai) both depict humanity’s fate and its confrontation with transcendent forces.

One presents a world sustained by myth and belief.
The other portrays psychic warriors battling a cosmic invader in an apocalyptic struggle.

Although their genres differ, both works share a central question: Why does the world move toward destruction, and how do humans resist it? This article compares their world-building, protagonists, and portrayals of gods and apocalypse.

---

World-Building: A Closed Mythic System vs. An Expanding Cosmic War

In The Endless Myth, the world is structured and stabilised by myth and faith. God stands at the centre, and narrative meaning preserves order. The threat of collapse is not merely physical—it is the collapse of meaning itself.

In contrast, Genma Wars depicts a cosmic-scale invasion by the Genma, overwhelming entities that threaten humanity’s survival. Psychic individuals rise to defend Earth, and the story expands from a terrestrial struggle into a vast interstellar conflict. Here, the apocalypse is literal and destructive.

• The Endless Myth: The world ends when meaning collapses.

• Genma Wars: The world ends through cosmic invasion.

---

Protagonists: A Fixed Symbol vs. An Awakened Youth

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure placed at the centre of a mythic framework. He is chosen from the outset and embedded within the structure of the narrative itself. His freedom is limited by his role.

In Genma Wars, the protagonist Jo Azuma begins as an ordinary boy who awakens to psychic powers. Though chosen by destiny, he struggles, doubts, and grows. His journey is one of inner development alongside increasing power.

• Messiah: A symbol from the beginning.

• Jo Azuma: A youth who grows into symbolic significance.

---

Gods and Transcendent Beings

In The Endless Myth, God is an absolute being sustained by faith. Divinity guarantees order and exists within the structure of the world.

In Genma Wars, the Genma are not gods sustained by belief but cosmic threats of overwhelming force. Humanity cannot rely on faith alone; it must fight back with psychic strength and unity.

The key distinction lies in perspective:

• A god within mythic order.

• A destructive force invading from beyond.

---

Concepts of Apocalypse

In The Endless Myth, apocalypse is conceptual—the erasure of meaning and narrative coherence. If myth disappears, humanity loses its reason for existence.

In Genma Wars, apocalypse is violent and tangible. Cities fall, lives are lost, and destruction spreads across worlds. The threat is immediate and physical.

Yet both works affirm that humanity is not entirely powerless.

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth persists through reinterpretation. As long as myth can be retold, the story survives.

Genma Wars expands as its enemies and battlefields expand. The scale grows from Earth to the cosmos, sustaining narrative momentum.

• A story prolonged by renewed meaning.

• A story prolonged by escalating conflict.

---

Conclusion: Inner Apocalypse vs. Outer Apocalypse

The Endless Myth and Genma Wars present contrasting visions of the end:

• An internal apocalypse born from the collapse of myth.

• An external apocalypse driven by cosmic invasion.

The former centres on philosophical and structural questions.
The latter thrives on dynamic action and escalating warfare.

Despite their differences, both works depict humanity standing before transcendent forces and striving to resist—whether through meaning or through power.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the Manga NARUTO

 

A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and NARUTO – Destiny, Will, and the Making of a Hero

The novel The Endless Myth and the globally popular manga NARUTO -ナルト- may appear very different in genre and audience. However, both works share profound mythic themes: destiny, chosen individuals, and the structures that sustain their worlds.

One tells the story of a world preserved by myth and faith.
The other unfolds in a ninja world shaped by bloodline, conflict, and inherited will.

This article compares The Endless Myth and NARUTO, examining their protagonists, their treatment of destiny and freedom, and the structural foundations of their respective worlds.

---

World Structure: A World Sustained by Myth vs. A World Defined by Bloodline

In The Endless Myth, the world is maintained by myth and belief. Gods and chosen figures stand at the centre of existence, and meaning itself stabilises reality. If myth collapses, so too does the world.

In NARUTO, mythic elements also exist—tailed beasts, legendary ancestors, and inherited powers. The history of the ninja world is shaped by conflict and lineage, and an individual’s strength is closely tied to bloodline and destiny.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains the world.

• NARUTO: Bloodline and power define the world.

---

Protagonists Compared: Messiah as Symbol vs. Naruto as a Growing Hero

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a symbolic figure placed at the centre of a mythic system. Chosen from the outset, he is bound by his role and deprived of freedom. His existence serves the structure of the narrative itself.

In contrast, the protagonist of NARUTO, Naruto Uzumaki, begins as an outcast who bears the Nine-Tailed Fox within him. Though marked by destiny, he grows through effort, resilience, and personal conviction. His journey is defined by transformation rather than confinement.

• Messiah: A figure fixed by role and symbolism.

• Naruto: A hero who reshapes destiny through will.

---

Destiny and Free Will

In The Endless Myth, destiny is embedded within the mythic framework. Characters are woven into inevitability; their choices operate within predetermined meaning.

In NARUTO, the central question repeatedly asked is whether destiny can be changed. Confrontations—such as those concerning inherited fate and personal choice—symbolise the clash between predestination and self-determination.

• The Endless Myth: Destiny preserves meaning.

• NARUTO: Will transcends destiny.

---

The Concept of the Divine and the Transcendent

In The Endless Myth, gods are absolute beings sustained by belief. They exist within the structure of the world and define its order.

In NARUTO, god-like figures and ancient powers appear, yet they remain part of historical continuity rather than standing entirely beyond it. Divinity is powerful but narratively integrated rather than absolute.

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth cannot truly end because the loss of myth would mean the loss of meaning itself. The story persists through reinterpretation and retelling.

NARUTO continued across generations because of inheritance and succession. From Naruto to the next generation, will is passed forward, allowing the narrative to expand into the future.

---

Conclusion: A Hero Bound by Meaning vs. A Hero Driven by Will

The Endless Myth and NARUTO present two contrasting narrative structures:

• A mythic hero who exists to preserve meaning.

• A determined hero who fights to create the future.

The former defines heroism through narrative structure and symbolism.
The latter defines heroism through growth and personal resolve.

To obey destiny—or to change it?

This fundamental divergence reveals the philosophical core that distinguishes the two works.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

**Comparison Between *The Endless Myth* and *The Matrix* Series**

 

The Endless Myth vs. The Matrix Series: Mythic Structure and Virtual Reality as Visions of the World’s True Nature

The novel The Endless Myth and the globally influential science fiction film series The Matrix both confront a fundamental question: is the world real?

One presents a universe sustained by myth and belief. The other depicts humanity trapped inside a simulated reality, awakening to a hidden truth. This article compares The Endless Myth and The Matrix series through their world structures, messianic figures, and themes of freedom and destiny.

---

World Structure: Reality Sustained by Meaning vs. Reality Constructed by Code

In The Endless Myth, the world is structured and stabilised by myth and faith. Gods exist because they are spoken of, and as long as myth is maintained, reality remains intact. The world is shaped by meaning.

In The Matrix, reality as perceived by humanity is merely a program—a simulation created by machines. What seems real is in fact code. The world is constructed not through belief, but through digital architecture.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning shapes reality

• The Matrix: Code constructs reality

---

The Messiah Figure: Fixed Symbol vs. Awakening “Chosen One”

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah is consumed as a symbolic figure. Chosen by myth, he loses personal freedom and becomes bound to a predetermined role. The myth takes precedence over the individual.

In The Matrix, Neo is “The One,” a chosen figure who awakens to the truth of the simulation. Yet his power depends on belief—particularly belief in himself. Although destiny frames his role, his journey is defined by repeated acts of choice.

• Messiah: A saviour fixed within myth

• Neo: A saviour who redefines himself through awakening

---

Freedom and Determinism

In The Endless Myth, myth stabilises the world, but it also restricts those within it. Characters are bound by structural necessity. Fate preserves meaning.

In The Matrix, the question of destiny is central. Prophecies and systemic cycles suggest inevitability, yet characters are constantly faced with choices. The possibility of breaking the cycle remains open.

• The Endless Myth: Destiny fixes meaning

• The Matrix: Choice destabilises structure

---

Gods and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods are sustained by faith and embedded within the world’s structure.

In The Matrix, godlike figures such as the Architect or machine intelligences function as system designers rather than objects of worship. They are not absolute; they can be negotiated with, resisted, or even challenged.

Is divinity something to believe in—
or something to overthrow?

This distinction reflects the deeper philosophical divergence between the two works.

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing myth would erase the world’s meaning. The narrative survives through reinterpretation and retelling.

The Matrix continues because its structure is cyclical. Even when the system collapses, it can be rebuilt in another form. The story persists through systemic renewal.

---

Conclusion: A World Bound by Meaning vs. A World Broken by Awakening

The Endless Myth and The Matrix series represent two opposing visions:

• A mythic world that exists to preserve meaning

• A simulated world that must be shattered through awakening

One insists that belief sustains reality.
The other suggests that questioning reality transforms it.

Together, they offer two contrasting answers to the enduring question:
What is the true nature of the world we inhabit?

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

The Endless Myth vs. The Ultraman Series: Mythic Heroes and Giants of Light as Structures of Salvation

The novel The Endless Myth and Japan’s iconic Ultraman series may seem entirely different in genre and format. One is a myth-centred literary work; the other is a long-running tokusatsu superhero franchise. Yet both revolve around shared themes: salvation, heroism, and transcendent beings.

One portrays a world sustained by faith and narrative. The other depicts giants of light who battle monsters to defend humanity. This article compares The Endless Myth and the Ultraman series through their worldbuilding, hero archetypes, and narrative structures.

---

World Structure: A World Sustained by Myth vs. A World Defended by Light

In The Endless Myth, the world exists because myth and belief sustain it. Gods and chosen figures are not merely characters; they are structural necessities. If meaning collapses, reality collapses.

In the Ultraman series, Earth is threatened by kaiju and alien invasions. Defence teams and scientific organisations attempt to protect humanity, while Ultraman arrives as a guardian from beyond. The world is preserved not through belief, but through action and combat.

• The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains the world

• Ultraman: A warrior of light defends the world

---

The Hero Archetype: Fixed Symbol vs. Shared Transformation

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is consumed as a symbol. Chosen by myth, he loses personal freedom. His identity is defined by role rather than individual will.

In Ultraman, the hero often merges with a human host. The giant of light and the human coexist, fighting together to protect others. The hero is both extraordinary and connected to everyday humanity.

• Messiah: Fixed at the centre of myth

• Ultraman: A transformative hero who fights alongside humanity

---

Divinity and the Meaning of Light

In The Endless Myth, gods are absolute beings sustained by belief. Divinity is embedded in the structure of reality.

In the Ultraman series, the giants of light possess immense power but are not omnipotent. They have time limits, vulnerabilities, and the possibility of defeat. They are closer to higher beings than true gods.

This distinction is crucial:
In The Endless Myth, divinity defines the structure of the world.
In Ultraman, heroism is defined through action.

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing myth would erase meaning itself. The story survives through reinterpretation and retelling.

The Ultraman series continues through renewal—new monsters, new generations, and new Ultramen inherit the mantle. Continuity is achieved through succession and legacy.

---

Philosophical Differences

The Endless Myth asks introspective questions:

• Why do humans need gods?

• Is myth salvation or imprisonment?

• Does meaning protect or constrain us?

The Ultraman series raises ethical and social questions:

• What is justice?

• What defines true strength?

• Can humanity coexist with the unknown?

---

Conclusion: Protecting Meaning vs. Protecting Life

The Endless Myth and the Ultraman series present two distinct forms of salvation:

• A myth that preserves the structure of meaning

• A hero of light who protects life itself

One safeguards the narrative foundation of the world.
The other safeguards the world through courage and sacrifice.

Myth or light.
Symbol or action.

Both are enduring stories of salvation created to help humanity survive in an uncertain world.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Doctor Who

 

The Endless Myth vs. Doctor Who: Myth and Time in Never-Ending Narratives

The novel The Endless Myth and the iconic British sci-fi series Doctor Who are both works often described as “never-ending stories.” However, the structural reasons behind their continuity differ dramatically.

One is a story sustained by myth and faith. The other is a science fiction epic driven by time travel across history and the cosmos. In this article, we compare The Endless Myth and Doctor Who, examining their world-building, protagonists, and narrative structures shaped by myth and time.

---

World-Building: A Closed Mythic World vs. An Open Temporal Universe

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure defined and stabilised by myth and belief. Myth is not merely folklore—it functions as the very foundation of order. The world continues to exist because myth continues to be told and believed.

In contrast, the universe of Doctor Who is open and fluid. Time and space can be traversed freely. History is not fixed but mutable, with multiple timelines and branching possibilities. Change is not a threat to existence—it is the very condition of it.

• The Endless Myth: A world stabilised by meaning

• Doctor Who: A universe sustained by change

---

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot truly conclude because if myth were to disappear, the meaning of the world itself would collapse. The narrative survives through reinterpretation and retelling. An ending would signify annihilation.

Doctor Who, on the other hand, continues through regeneration. The Doctor renews their body and personality while retaining continuity of memory and identity. The story does not reset—it evolves.

One persists through repetition of meaning.
The other continues through transformation.

---

Protagonists: Fixity vs. Transformation

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is consumed as a symbol. Positioned at the centre of myth, he is constrained by the role imposed upon him. Being chosen becomes a burden rather than a blessing.

The Doctor in Doctor Who embodies change itself. Though fundamentally the same being, each regeneration produces a new personality and emotional tone. The Doctor is both a symbol and a living demonstration of flux.

• Messiah: An existence fixed by meaning

• The Doctor: An existence sustained by change

---

Gods and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods exist through belief and narrative reinforcement. Divinity is embedded within the structure of the world and dependent upon faith.

In Doctor Who, godlike beings appear frequently, but they are often reframed through science-fictional logic. Transcendence is not primarily an object of worship but something to confront, understand, or challenge.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth raises introspective questions:

• Why do humans need myth?

• Is faith salvation or confinement?

• Is a life bound by meaning truly free?

Doctor Who asks more dynamic, forward-looking questions:

• Can individuals change history?

• Does morality persist across time?

• Can identity survive constant transformation?

---

Conclusion: Preserved Meaning vs. Perpetual Change

The Endless Myth and Doctor Who represent two contrasting models of the never-ending narrative:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A time-travel epic that never ends because change never stops

One survives through retelling.
The other survives through renewal.

Together, they illustrate two fundamentally different answers to the same question:

How does a story avoid ending?

By being believed in forever —
or by changing forever.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon 

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Star Trek

 

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Star Trek

Myth and Reason as Two Visions of the Future

The novel The Endless Myth and the iconic science fiction franchise Star Trek both depict humanity and the universe on a grand scale. One is a story centred on myth and faith, while the other is grounded in science, reason, and humanistic ideals. At first glance, they appear to represent opposing worldviews.

Yet both works ask the same fundamental question: what should humanity believe in, and what should guide the world forward? This article compares The Endless Myth and Star Trek, focusing on their worldbuilding, views of humanity, and narrative structures.

---

Worldviews Compared: A World Governed by Myth vs. a Universe Expanded by Reason

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure in which myth and belief function as the foundation of order. Gods exist because they are spoken of, and the world remains stable as long as its myths are maintained. Meaning offers salvation, but it also acts as a constraint.

By contrast, the universe of Star Trek is open and expansive, driven by science and exploration. The unknown is not sacred or forbidden, but something to be understood. Technologies such as warp travel and contact with alien civilisations symbolise humanity’s ability to transcend limits through reason.

• The Endless Myth: a world closed by meaning

• Star Trek: a universe expanded by reason

---

Why the Stories Continue

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing its myths would mean the collapse of the world’s meaning. The story survives by being retold, and the concept of an ending itself is rejected.

Star Trek continues because exploration never ends. The universe always presents new worlds, cultures, and ethical dilemmas. The narrative is sustained not by repetition, but by forward movement.

---

Protagonists and Views of Humanity

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah is consumed as a chosen symbol. His personal will is secondary to the mythic role imposed upon him.

In Star Trek, protagonists such as Kirk, Picard, and Sisko are not symbols but decision-makers. They are not chosen by destiny; they choose, judge, and accept responsibility for their actions.

• Messiah: a bearer of imposed meaning

• Star Trek captains: agents of choice

---

Gods and Transcendence

In The Endless Myth, gods are embedded within the structure of the world and sustained by belief. Faith creates divinity, and divinity defines reality.

In Star Trek, god-like beings such as Q or higher-dimensional entities appear, but they are ultimately subject to dialogue, ethics, and understanding. Transcendence is not worshipped; it is examined and relativised through reason.

---

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth raises inward-looking, existential questions:

• Why do humans need myths?

• Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation?

• Does faith preserve the world, or imprison it?

Star Trek presents forward-looking, humanistic questions:

• Can reason overcome conflict?

• Can diversity coexist peacefully?

• Can progress align with ethics?

---

Conclusion: A World Sustained by Belief and a Universe Driven by Inquiry

The Endless Myth and Star Trek portray two different forms of continuity:

• A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved

• A future that does not end because exploration never stops

The former sustains the world through belief; the latter advances the future through inquiry. Together, they present two enduring human strategies for surviving an uncertain universe.

Myth or reason.
Faith or exploration.

Both are, in their own way, stories that refuse to end.

Webnovel

AmazonUK 

Amazon