The Endless Myth of the Gods

2026年2月9日月曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Borges’ The Library of Babel

An Infinite World of Stories and a Labyrinth of Meaning

The novel The Endless Myth and Jorge Luis Borges’ short story “The Library of Babel” are works that place infinity and narrative at their core. Although they differ greatly in genre and form, both explore a fundamental question: what does it mean for meaning itself to be endless?

This article compares The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel, focusing on their worldviews, their treatment of infinity, and the role of humanity within those worlds.

Worldviews Compared: A Myth Sustained by Speech vs. a Universe Already Written

The world of The Endless Myth exists because myths and beliefs are continually retold. Stories are not fixed; they are revised and reinterpreted. As long as meaning is preserved through narration, the world endures.

By contrast, The Library of Babel depicts a universe that already contains every possible book formed from all combinations of letters. Everything has been written, yet most of it is meaningless. This is not a generative infinity, but a complete and static infinity.

The Endless Myth: an infinity where meaning is continually created
The Library of Babel: an infinity where meaning is buried

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing its myths would mean the collapse of the world’s meaning. To stop telling stories is to invite dissolution. The narrative survives by being retold.

The Library of Babel never ends for the opposite reason: nothing new is added. Exploration continues endlessly, but creation does not. There is no conclusion, only repetition, wandering, and despair.

The Human Position: Bearers of Myth vs. Seekers of Meaning

In The Endless Myth, humans actively sustain the world. Characters, including the protagonist Messiah, are bound to symbolic roles that give meaning to existence. Humanity is part of the structure that maintains reality.

In The Library of Babel, humans are searchers. They hunt for the one book that explains everything, but most are driven to madness or nihilism. Humans do not sustain the universe; they are overwhelmed by its infinity.

The Endless Myth: humans create and uphold meaning
The Library of Babel: humans search for meaning

Myth and Books as Symbols

In The Endless Myth, myth is a functional narrative. It shapes society and gains power through belief. When belief weakens, the structure of the world trembles.

In The Library of Babel, books symbolize both ultimate knowledge and ultimate futility. Language itself becomes mythic and is simultaneously stripped of authority. Meaning exists only as possibility, rarely as reality.

Philosophical Differences

The Endless Myth asks:

Why do humans need stories?
Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation?
Do myths protect the world, or imprison it?

The Library of Babel asks:

Does meaning truly exist?
Can truth be found within infinity?
Can language fully explain reality?

Conclusion: A World Sustained by Speech and an Infinity of Silence

The Endless Myth and The Library of Babel present two opposing forms of endlessness:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved
A universe that cannot end because meaning is excessive

The former sustains reality through narration; the latter traps humanity within an already-written cosmos. Together, these works reveal how essential, and how dangerous, stories and meaning are to human existence.

To read The Endless Myth is to stand on the side of belief.
To read The Library of Babel is to stand where belief itself is questioned.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

The Library of Babel　Website

2026年2月8日日曜日

**A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and *Star Wars***

A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Star Wars

A Story Bound by Myth vs. a Galactic Saga That Rewrites Myth

The novel The Endless Myth and George Lucas’s legendary film series Star Wars both place mythological structures at the core of their narratives. However, they differ fundamentally in how they relate to myth—and in why their stories continue.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Star Wars by examining their worldviews, protagonists, concepts of fate and free will, and narrative structures.

Worldbuilding: A World Ruled by Myth vs. A Galaxy That Borrows Myth

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system in which myth and faith function directly as social order. Myth is not merely a story; it is an institution. People live according to meanings and roles imposed by myth, and questioning it threatens the foundation of the world itself.

In contrast, the Star Wars universe is an expansive galaxy that uses myth as a narrative device rather than a governing system. Concepts such as the Force, prophecy, and the Chosen One exist, but they do not rigidly define reality. Their meanings shift depending on how characters interpret and respond to them.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot truly end because losing myth would mean losing meaning itself. Myth is constantly rewritten and reinterpreted in order to survive. An ending would not bring salvation—it would create a void.

Star Wars continues because galactic history is passed down through generations. Even when one story concludes, new generations, conflicts, and interpretations emerge. What endures is not a single myth, but the continuous reuse and reimagining of myth.

Protagonists Compared: A Symbol Bound by Meaning vs. Heroes Who Choose Their Fate

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, the Messiah, is a figure fixed as a symbol. His personal emotions and choices are overwritten by his mythological role. Being “chosen” is not a blessing—it is a loss of freedom.

The heroes of Star Wars—Luke, Anakin, Rey, and others—may be “chosen,” but they are defined by how they respond to that destiny. The Force may guide them, but the final decision is always theirs.

The Messiah: A being burdened with imposed meaning
Star Wars heroes: Individuals who reinterpret and redefine meaning

Fate and Free Will

In The Endless Myth, fate is embedded in the mythological structure itself. Free will exists, but only within the boundaries of myth. One may choose, but one cannot escape one’s role.

In Star Wars, prophecy and destiny are present, yet constantly challenged. Characters may fall or resist, submit or rebel. Fate is never fully fixed—it remains unstable and contested.

Philosophical Focus

The Endless Myth asks deeply introspective questions:

Why do humans need myth?
Is a life bound by meaning truly just?
Is salvation necessary—or oppressive?

Star Wars, by contrast, presents a modernized myth that emphasizes:

Moral choice between good and evil
The temptation of power
Hope as something passed down through generations

Conclusion: A Story Trapped in Myth vs. A Story That Keeps Using Myth

Although both works are mythic in nature, they move in opposite directions:

A myth that cannot end because it cannot lose meaning
A saga that continues by constantly rewriting myth

One remains enclosed within myth; the other endlessly reshapes it. This contrast offers a powerful insight into what myth means in the modern age—and why stories continue to be told.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年2月7日土曜日

**A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Greg Egan’s *Diaspora***

The Endless Myth vs. Greg Egan’s Diaspora: A Comparison of Meaning-Bound Worlds and Evolving Intelligence Beyond Meaning

The novel The Endless Myth and Greg Egan’s hard science fiction classic Diaspora both depict realities that extend beyond traditional human limits. However, their philosophical orientations point in nearly opposite directions. One fixes the world through myth and faith, while the other expands it through physics and reason.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Diaspora, focusing on worldbuilding, the nature of subjectivity, and why each narrative refuses to truly end.

Worldbuilding Compared: A World Closed by Myth vs. A Universe Opened by Physical Law

The world of The Endless Myth is structured so that myth and belief function as the foundation of order. Myth is not merely a story but an institutional system that explains, assigns meaning to, and stabilizes reality. People understand the world through myth, but that understanding simultaneously becomes a limitation.

By contrast, the universe of Diaspora is constructed entirely through physics and mathematics. The setting extends far beyond human society, populated by informational beings known as polises and intelligences without physical bodies exploring the cosmos. There is no mythic explanation here; the universe is assumed to be fully intelligible.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because if myth disappears, the meaning of the world collapses. Myth survives through continual reinterpretation and retelling, refusing closure. An ending would signify not salvation, but the erasure of meaning.

The narrative of Diaspora also lacks a definitive endpoint, but for the opposite reason. As long as intelligence continues to evolve and deepen its understanding of the universe, exploration never ceases. Endlessness here signifies progress, not stagnation.

Subjectivity: Symbolic Humans vs. Continuously Updated Minds

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, exists primarily as a symbol. Chosen and positioned at the center of myth, he loses individual freedom. What matters is not what he thinks, but what he represents.

In Diaspora, subjectivity is fluid. Minds are copied, branched, merged, and rewritten. Identity is not anchored in symbolic meaning but in information and structure. Being a symbol carries no inherent value.

Free Will and Constraint

In The Endless Myth, free will operates only within the boundaries of myth. Choice exists, but it can never fully escape mythic structure. Understanding binds.

In Diaspora, the only true constraints are the laws of physics. Ethics, culture, and even identity are mutable design parameters. Understanding is not a cage, but a path to liberation.

Philosophical Divergence

The Endless Myth asks inward, human-centered questions:

Why do humans need myth?
Is a life governed by meaning truly just?
Is salvation actually necessary?

Diaspora poses questions that decenter humanity:

How far can intelligence evolve?
Can consciousness transcend physical form?
Is “humanity” itself essential?

Conclusion: A Story That Clings to Meaning vs. A Story That Moves Beyond It

The Endless Myth and Diaspora represent opposing narrative logics:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved
A cosmic exploration that never ends because understanding never stops

One continues to ask what meaning is. The other moves toward a future where meaning may no longer be required. Together, they clarify the distinct roles myth and hard science fiction play in exploring the limits of storytelling.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年2月6日金曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and ONE PIECE

The Endless Myth vs. ONE PIECE: A Comparison of Myth-Bound Narratives and Endless Adventures in Search of Freedom

The novel The Endless Myth and Eiichiro Oda’s globally renowned manga ONE PIECE are both long-running narratives often described as “stories without an end.” However, the meaning of that endlessness and the direction each story takes are fundamentally different.

This article compares The Endless Myth and ONE PIECE, focusing on differences in worldbuilding, protagonist design, freedom, and narrative structure.

Worldbuilding Compared: A World Closed by Myth vs. A World Open to the Sea

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system governed by myth and faith. Myth functions not only as storytelling but as a social institution, binding people to fixed meanings and roles. The world exists because it is continually narrated, and questioning myth threatens the stability of reality itself.

By contrast, the world of ONE PIECE is open to vast oceans and unexplored islands. While authoritarian forces such as the World Government and the Celestial Dragons exist, the world itself remains fluid, constantly reshaped through adventure and discovery.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing myth would collapse the meaning of the world. Myth survives through reinterpretation and repetition. An ending would not bring salvation, but emptiness.

ONE PIECE continues because adventure itself drives the narrative. The world is filled with unknown lands, and the journey with one’s companions is valued more than reaching a final destination. Forward movement is the story’s purpose.

Protagonists in Contrast: A Consumed Symbol vs. The Embodiment of Freedom

Messiah, the protagonist of The Endless Myth, is a chosen figure consumed as a symbol. His personal will and emotions are overwritten by his mythic role. Freedom exists, but only within the boundaries defined by myth.

Monkey D. Luffy, the protagonist of ONE PIECE, embodies freedom itself. Though surrounded by destiny and lineage, he repeatedly rejects submission and chooses to become what he wants to be.

Messiah: a figure burdened with meaning
Luffy: a figure who runs past meaning and keeps moving

The Treatment of Free Will

In The Endless Myth, free will exists only inside the structure of myth. People may choose, but they can never fully escape their assigned narrative roles.

In ONE PIECE, free will is the core of the story. Defying authority, confronting historical injustice, and choosing one’s own path are presented as moral imperatives. Freedom is dangerous, and that danger gives it value.

Ideological Differences

The Endless Myth raises introspective, philosophical questions:

Why do humans need myth?
Is a life bound by meaning truly just?
Is salvation even necessary?

ONE PIECE emphasizes emotional and action-driven values:

Fighting for freedom
Trusting one’s companions
Rejecting injustice with conviction

Conclusion: Two Opposite Forms of Endless Storytelling

Although both narratives are vast and ongoing, they represent opposite narrative logics:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must not be lost
An adventure that never ends because the pursuit of freedom continues

One is a story that keeps questioning itself. The other is a story that keeps moving forward. Together, they show how “endlessness” can serve entirely different purposes in storytelling.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年2月5日木曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the Xeelee Series

The Endless Myth vs. the Xeelee Sequence: Myth-Bound Worlds and a Universe Ruled by Physics

The novel The Endless Myth and Stephen Baxter’s hard-SF masterpiece, the Xeelee Sequence, both depict stories on a cosmic scale, featuring humanity, transcendent beings, and narratives with no clear end. However, the worldviews and philosophies they present point in almost completely opposite directions.

This article compares The Endless Myth and the Xeelee Sequence, focusing on myth versus physical law, meaning versus reality, and the true nature of “endlessness.”

Worldbuilding Compared: A World Ruled by Meaning vs. a Universe Ruled by Laws

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system in which myth and faith function as the very foundation of order. Myth is not just a story but a social institution. People understand reality through meaning, and their lives are shaped by it. The world exists because it is continually told.

In contrast, the Xeelee Sequence presents an open universe governed entirely by physical laws and cosmic history. There is no mythic explanation. The universe obeys causality with brutal consistency. Humanity is not the center of existence, but merely one intelligent species among many.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because losing myth would mean losing meaning itself. Myth is constantly revised and retold to sustain the world. An ending would not bring salvation, but collapse.

The Xeelee Sequence has no true ending because it attempts to depict cosmic history itself. The rise and fall of humanity, galaxy-spanning wars, the death and rebirth of the universe. Individual stories conclude, but time continues forward.

The Endless Myth: it cannot end because meaning must be preserved
Xeelee Sequence: it does not end because time never stops

Protagonists in Contrast: Symbolic Humans vs. Insignificant Humanity

In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah is a human consumed as a symbol. His individuality and will are overwritten by his mythic role. Humanity is placed at the center of the world, but at the cost of freedom.

In the Xeelee Sequence, there is no dominant protagonist. Humanity itself is portrayed as a negligible presence before the overwhelmingly superior Xeelee. Humans are not symbols, not chosen beings, but fleeting elements within an immense cosmic timeline.

Gods and Higher Beings

In The Endless Myth, gods exist through faith. They gain power by being believed in and bind the world through meaning. God is not outside reality, but embedded within its structure.

The Xeelee are not gods. They are entities pushed to the extreme limits of physical evolution. Their power is not miraculous but theoretical. There is no salvation, no intention, and no concern for humanity.

Different Forms of Infinity and Despair

The despair of The Endless Myth lies in being unable to escape meaning. Understanding the world is what traps humanity within it.

The despair of the Xeelee Sequence lies in understanding and still being powerless. The universe is too vast, humanity too weak, and the cosmos utterly indifferent.

Ideological Contrast

The Endless Myth asks inward-facing questions:

Why do humans need myth?
Is a life governed by meaning truly just?
Is faith salvation, or is it a cage?

The Xeelee Sequence confronts outward-facing, merciless questions:

Does the universe need humanity at all?
Does intelligence have intrinsic value?
Does survival itself possess meaning?

Conclusion: A Story Closed by Meaning vs. a Universe That Rejects Meaning

The Endless Myth and the Xeelee Sequence represent opposite narrative structures:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must not be lost
A cosmic history that never ends because meaning does not exist

One pushes human-centered storytelling to its limit. The other dismantles it completely. This contrast clearly reveals what myth and science fiction are each designed to explore, and why “endlessness” can signify entirely different things depending on the story that employs it.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年2月4日水曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Suggsverse

The Endless Myth vs. Suggsverse: Exploring the True Nature of “Infinity” Through Mythic Structure and Cosmic Inflation

The novel The Endless Myth and Lionel Suggs’s hyper-inflated fictional universe Suggsverse both deal with concepts such as infinity, absoluteness, and godhood. At first glance, they appear to occupy similar territory. However, the way each work treats infinity and the conditions under which its story continues are fundamentally different.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Suggsverse, examining how gods, universes, and narratives become “endless” in radically different ways.

Worldbuilding Compared: Myth Closed by Meaning vs. Universes Expanded by Scale

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure defined by myth and faith. God exists not first as an omnipotent being, but as one who is spoken of. The world is explained through myth, and it continues to exist only as long as it is explained. Meaning is the system that holds reality together.

Suggsverse, by contrast, is a hyper-multiversal setting that expands endlessly through numbers and hierarchies. Infinite dimensions, infinite universes, and omnipotence beyond omnipotence are continually defined and surpassed. Here, the world is sustained not by meaning, but by scale.

The Endless Myth: the world is preserved by meaning
Suggsverse: the world expands through numerical and conceptual escalation

Different Definitions of God

In The Endless Myth, God is absolute yet dependent on human faith and narrative. God gains power by being believed in and becomes fixed by being told. God does not exist outside the world, but is embedded within its very structure.

In Suggsverse, gods are ranked super-beings. Concepts such as omnipotence, infinity, and unknowability are constantly overwritten by higher-tier entities. These gods require no belief. They exist purely as settings, endlessly replaced and upgraded.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because if myth disappears, the meaning of the world collapses. The story does not conclude; it is repeatedly retold to survive. An ending would not be resolution, but destruction.

Suggsverse continues because its structure allows for the endless addition of stronger beings and greater infinities. The story persists not out of philosophical necessity, but because expansion is always possible at the level of settings.

The Role of Protagonists and Characters

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a figure consumed as a symbol. Chosen by myth, he loses freedom and is burdened with meaning. Individual power matters less than the role he is forced to embody.

Characters in Suggsverse exist for the sake of power itself. They are not symbols but benchmarks, defined by comparison and superiority. Emotional depth and inner conflict are secondary to the scale of their abilities.

Infinity as Quality vs. Infinity as Quantity

The infinity depicted in The Endless Myth is qualitative infinity. Meaning, faith, and myth never reach an endpoint, and that endlessness itself creates infinity.

Suggsverse presents quantitative infinity. The number of universes, dimensions, and hierarchies increases without limit, and infinity is expressed through accumulation.

This distinction creates a profound difference in how each work feels to the reader.

Ideological Contrast

The Endless Myth centers on philosophical and introspective questions:

Why do humans need gods?
Is a life bound by meaning truly just?
Is myth salvation, or is it a cage?

Suggsverse foregrounds conceptual and experimental questions:

How powerful can something become?
How far can infinity be stacked?
Can even the absolute be surpassed?

Conclusion: Two Opposite Paths to the Infinite

Although both The Endless Myth and Suggsverse portray gods and infinity, they move in opposite directions:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must not be lost
A setting that never ends because expansion never stops

The former questions the relationship between humans and stories. The latter pushes the limits of concepts themselves. This comparison makes clear that the word “infinity” carries radically different meanings depending on the narrative structure that employs it.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年2月3日火曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and Battle Through the Heavens

The Endless Myth vs. Battle Through the Heavens: A Comparative Study of Myth-Bound Worlds and Endless Ascension

The novel The Endless Myth and the hugely popular Chinese fantasy series Battle Through the Heavens (斗破苍穹) are both expansive, long-running works. However, the reasons their stories continue and the way their protagonists are positioned within their worlds differ radically.

This article compares The Endless Myth and Battle Through the Heavens, focusing on their worldbuilding, protagonists, and the treatment of growth and myth to examine the underlying narrative structures of each work.

Worldbuilding: A World Fixed by Myth vs. A World Expanded by Hierarchy

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system where myth and faith function as the very foundation of order. Myth is not merely a collection of stories but an institutional framework that defines meaning itself. People are forced to live within the boundaries of myth, and escaping it is nearly impossible.

In contrast, the world of Battle Through the Heavens is an open system that expands endlessly through cultivation levels, ranks, and power hierarchies. As the protagonist grows stronger, new regions, factions, and even higher realms are revealed. The world evolves in step with personal advancement.

Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot truly end because losing myth would mean the collapse of meaning itself. Myth is constantly revised and retold, but never rejected. An ending would not bring salvation; it would create a void.

Battle Through the Heavens became a long-running series because its growth system has no predefined ceiling. Defeating a powerful enemy only reveals a stronger one. The narrative continues not through mythic necessity, but through the promise of ever-greater strength.

Protagonists in Contrast: The Chosen Symbol vs. The Self-Made Ascender

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is a chosen figure consumed as a symbol. His value is defined not by personal effort, but by the role imposed on him by myth. Being chosen strips him of freedom.

By contrast, Xiao Yan, the protagonist of Battle Through the Heavens, is a self-made hero who rises through effort, failure, and perseverance. After losing his powers and falling to the lowest rank, he regains strength through training and combat.

Messiah: a figure burdened with meaning
Xiao Yan: a figure who acquires meaning through action

This distinction clearly separates the ethical foundations of the two narratives.

Myth vs. Growth

In The Endless Myth, growth is not necessarily positive. Gaining power or understanding often means becoming more deeply entangled in myth. Growth represents not liberation, but deeper confinement.

In Battle Through the Heavens, growth is an absolute good. Training leads to power, power leads to broader horizons, and the world opens accordingly. Gods and destiny may exist, but they are obstacles to overcome, not systems to submit to.

Ideological Differences

The Endless Myth poses introspective and philosophical questions such as:

Why do humans need myths?
Is being chosen a blessing or a curse?
Is a life bound by meaning truly just?

Battle Through the Heavens emphasizes action-oriented values:

Effort is rewarded
Strength proves identity
Individuals can carve open the world through will and action

Conclusion: Two Paths to an Endless Story

Although both The Endless Myth and Battle Through the Heavens are long-running narratives, they represent opposite structural principles:

A myth that cannot end because meaning must not be lost
An ascension story that never ends because growth never stops

One confines humanity within myth. The other pushes humanity beyond the limits of the world.

This contrast highlights the diversity of reasons why modern fantasy stories continue and what “endlessness” truly means in narrative form.

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon