2026年4月7日火曜日

Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy

— Cosmic Myth and the Universal Desire for Gold —

The novel Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy may seem completely different at first glance.

One is a multiverse-scale mythology, while the other is a grounded story about a hidden gold treasure in Hokkaido.

Yet both works are deeply connected through a shared theme: desire.

In particular, the treasure hunt in Golden Kamuy reflects a universal narrative found across cultures.
This article explores that connection alongside a broader comparison.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Expansion vs. Goal-Oriented Narrative

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It continuously grows through multiverses, dimensions, and conceptual layers.

In contrast, Golden Kamuy is driven toward a clear objective.
The story converges on a single goal: finding the hidden gold.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly expanding myth
Golden Kamuy: narrative focused on a defined goal

2. Worldview: Cosmic Structure vs. Physical Landscape

In Endless Myth, the universe itself is the story.
Its structure defines the narrative.

In Golden Kamuy, the physical world is central.
The landscapes of Hokkaido, along with its history and culture, play a crucial role.

Thus:

Endless Myth: abstract cosmos
Golden Kamuy: tangible reality

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Embodiments of Desire

Characters in Endless Myth often represent elements of a larger cosmic system.

In Golden Kamuy, characters embody different forms of desire—
wealth, survival, revenge, honor.

Notably, Saichi Sugimoto pursues the gold while carrying personal promises and the will to survive.

4. The Universal Narrative of Treasure Hunting

This is a key point.

The idea of searching for gold or treasure appears across cultures:

Treasure hunts
Lost gold legends
Myths like El Dorado

These stories symbolize both human desire and hope.

The gold hunt in Golden Kamuy belongs to this universal tradition.
However, it goes beyond simple treasure seeking by intertwining each character’s personal motivations and histories.

5. Representation of Desire: Structure vs. Conflict

In Endless Myth, desire is embedded within structure.
The expansion of the universe and the pursuit of existence itself can be seen as a form of desire.

In Golden Kamuy, desire is direct and tangible.
It manifests through conflict—violence, alliances, betrayal.

6. Essence of Myth: Infinity vs. Acquisition

Endless Myth is a myth of infinity—
the pursuit of limitless existence and understanding.

Golden Kamuy is a myth of acquisition—
centered on obtaining something concrete and valuable.

Conclusion: What Do Humans Truly Seek?

Endless Myth and Golden Kamuy represent two forms of desire:

Endless Myth: the desire for infinity
Golden Kamuy: the desire for tangible value

The former is abstract and limitless.
The latter is grounded and immediate.

Yet both reveal a fundamental truth:
humans are beings who are always searching for something.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

What do humans truly seek—
the infinite understanding of existence,
or something they can hold in their hands?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月6日月曜日

Endless Myth and Korean Dramas

— Cosmic Myth and Modern Love-Hate Narratives —

The novel Endless Myth and contemporary Korean dramas (K-dramas) may appear to belong to completely different genres.

One explores mythology on a multiversal scale, while the other focuses on human relationships in modern society.

Yet both are deeply connected through a shared question: how is myth reconstructed in the modern world?

This article compares them through the lenses of myth structure, character, emotional conflict, and modern adaptation.

1. Form of Myth: Cosmic Expansion vs. Everyday Focus

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It extends through multiverses and omniversal structures, exploring existence itself.

Korean dramas, in contrast, bring myth into everyday life.
Their settings revolve around family, romance, and work—familiar spaces for modern audiences.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth expanding toward the cosmos
K-dramas: myth grounded in everyday life

2. Myth Structure: Abstract Systems vs. Relationship Networks

In Endless Myth, the universe itself forms the structure of myth.
Layers of reality and divine hierarchies define the narrative framework.

In Korean dramas, relationships form the structure.
Family ties, romantic entanglements, betrayal, and revenge create a complex emotional network.

Thus:

Endless Myth: cosmic structure
K-dramas: relational structure

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Emotional Beings

Characters in Endless Myth often represent elements of a larger cosmic system.

In Korean dramas, characters are driven by emotion.
Love, jealousy, anger, ambition, and revenge shape their actions and decisions.

So:

Endless Myth: concept-driven characters
K-dramas: emotion-driven characters

4. Love and Conflict: The Modernization of Myth

This is the most important point.

The love-hate narratives in Korean dramas mirror the structure of classical mythology:

Love and betrayal
Blood ties and conflict
Revenge and fate

These elements are found in ancient myths across cultures.

K-dramas reinterpret them within modern contexts—
corporate power struggles, family dynamics, and romantic relationships.

In this sense, Korean dramas are not separate from myth;
they are modernized mythologies expressed through human relationships.

5. Time and Fate: Infinite Possibility vs. Narrative Destiny

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
All possibilities coexist across different realities.

In Korean dramas, time is linear but shaped by fate.
Characters move within seemingly unavoidable emotional and relational trajectories.

6. Essence of Myth: Structure and Emotion

Endless Myth presents myth as structure—
a system of infinity, existence, and cosmic order.

Korean dramas present myth as emotion—
stories driven by human relationships and emotional intensity.

Conclusion: Has Myth Descended from the Cosmos into Human Life?

Endless Myth and Korean dramas represent two stages of myth:

Endless Myth: myth at the cosmic level
K-dramas: myth adapted to human society

The former approaches the origin of myth.
The latter represents its transformation into modern storytelling.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Does myth originate in the vast structure of the cosmos—
or is it ultimately completed within human emotion and relationships?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月5日日曜日

Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris

— Cosmic Myth and the Limits of Human Emotion —

The novel Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris (directed by Bernardo Bertolucci) operate in entirely different domains, yet both confront the limits of human experience.

One explores infinity through multiversal structure, while the other dives into the extremes of emotion, intimacy, and isolation.

At the time of its release, Last Tango in Paris sparked intense global controversy—making it not only a film, but a cultural flashpoint.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Enclosed Intimacy

Endless Myth is built upon infinite expansion.
Its narrative extends across multiverses and omniversal layers, forming a boundless mythological structure.

In contrast, Last Tango in Paris unfolds within a highly confined emotional space.
The anonymous relationship between two individuals becomes the entire universe of the story.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding myth
Last Tango: myth formed within a closed emotional space

2. Domain of Expression: Cosmos vs. Emotion

Endless Myth operates in the realm of abstraction—
time, space, infinity, and existence itself.

Last Tango in Paris focuses on raw human emotion—
loneliness, grief, desire, and psychological exposure.

Thus:

Endless Myth: limits of conceptual reality
Last Tango: limits of emotional reality

3. Characters: Structural Entities vs. Emotional Exposure

Characters in Endless Myth are often positioned within a larger cosmic system.
They function as parts of a vast structure.

In Last Tango in Paris, characters strip away social identity and expose their inner selves.
The performance of Marlon Brando, in particular, reveals deep emotional vulnerability and existential despair.

4. Controversy at Release: Censorship and Ethical Debate

Last Tango in Paris generated major controversy upon release:

Explicit sexual content
Scenes raising serious ethical concerns
Bans, censorship, and legal action in multiple countries

In Italy, the film led to a court ruling, confiscation of prints, and legal consequences for the director.

In later years, discussions about consent during production further complicated its legacy, making it a subject of ongoing ethical debate—not just artistic evaluation.

5. Limits of Expression: Art or Transgression?

Endless Myth challenges the limits of human understanding.
It explores infinity, cosmic structure, and what lies beyond comprehension.

Last Tango in Paris challenges emotional and physical boundaries.
However, it also raises the question of whether those boundaries were crossed in ethically problematic ways.

The central issue becomes:

Is pushing limits an act of artistic expression—
or does it risk becoming transgression?

6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Emotional Exposure

Endless Myth presents myth as structure—
a system of infinity and existence.

Last Tango in Paris presents human experience as exposure—
revealing emotion and desire without concealment.

Conclusion: Does Myth Exist in the Cosmos or Within the Human Psyche?

Endless Myth and Last Tango in Paris approach the nature of humanity from opposite directions:

Endless Myth: understanding humanity through cosmic structure
Last Tango: revealing humanity through emotional depth

The former questions existence through abstraction.
The latter exposes it through raw experience.

And this comparison leads to a fundamental question:

Does myth reside in the vast structure of the universe—
or does it emerge from the deepest layers of human emotion?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月4日土曜日

Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses

— Cosmic Myth and the Limits of Bodily Expression —

The novel Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses (directed by Nagisa Oshima) move in completely different directions, yet both can be understood as works that confront the limits of expression.

One pushes toward the limits of the cosmos, infinity, and existence.
The other confronts the limits of the body, desire, and social taboo.

At the time of its release, In the Realm of the Senses provoked intense debate.
This comparison includes that historical and cultural context.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Structure vs. Extreme Experience

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
Through multiverses and omniversal structures, it explores existence itself as a system.

In contrast, In the Realm of the Senses is an intensely focused experience.
The narrative narrows almost entirely to the relationship between two individuals, amplifying desire to its extreme.

In short:

Endless Myth: myth expanding toward infinity
In the Realm of the Senses: experience condensed to an extreme point

2. Domain of Expression: Cosmos vs. Body

Endless Myth operates in an abstract domain.
Time, dimensions, and infinity form its core themes.

In the Realm of the Senses is grounded entirely in the body.
Desire, sexuality, and physical sensation become the central language of the work.

Thus:

Endless Myth: limits of abstraction
In the Realm of the Senses: limits of the body

3. Characters: Structural Entities vs. Beings of Desire

Characters in Endless Myth are often positioned within a cosmic structure.
They function as parts of a larger conceptual system.

In In the Realm of the Senses, characters are driven by desire.
They move beyond social roles and become embodiments of pure impulse.

4. Historical Controversy: Art or Pornography?

In the Realm of the Senses sparked major controversy upon release.

Explicit, unsimulated sexual content
Crossing perceived boundaries of cinematic representation
Conflicts with censorship laws and legal systems

In Japan, legal and censorship issues led to complex production and distribution circumstances, including completion and release abroad.

The film became a central case in debates over whether it should be considered art or pornography.

5. Limits of Expression: Challenge or Transgression?

Endless Myth challenges conceptual limits.
It explores infinity, the structure of existence, and what lies beyond comprehension.

In the Realm of the Senses challenges physical and ethical limits.
It blurs boundaries between sexuality, violence, and representation.

The key question becomes:

Is this a challenge to the limits of expression—
or merely an act of excess?

6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Impulse

Endless Myth presents myth as structure—
a system of infinity and existence.

In the Realm of the Senses presents humanity as impulse—
driven by desire and instinct.

Conclusion: How Far Can Expression Go?

Endless Myth and In the Realm of the Senses represent two radically different approaches to the limits of expression:

Endless Myth: pushing the limits of conceptual understanding
In the Realm of the Senses: pushing the limits of physical and ethical representation

The former challenges the limits of comprehension.
The latter challenges the limits of depiction.

And this comparison leads to an unavoidable question:

How far should expression be allowed to go?
Is confronting limits an act of art—
or does it risk becoming transgression?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月3日金曜日

Endless Myth and Battle Royale

— Cosmic Myth and Extreme Social Experiment —

The novel Endless Myth and Battle Royale (based on the novel Battle Royale) appear to stand at opposite ends of storytelling.

One explores myth on a multiversal scale, while the other depicts a brutal survival game within a confined space.

Yet both works ultimately confront the same fundamental question: what does it mean to be human?

In addition, Battle Royale became a subject of major public debate upon its release.
This comparison includes that historical context as well.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Expansion vs. Extreme Compression

Endless Myth is a mythology of infinite expansion.
It extends across multiverses, omniverses, and even beyond, continuously generating new layers of existence.

In contrast, Battle Royale is an extremely compressed narrative.
It takes place on a single isolated island, with a limited number of participants and a strict time constraint.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding myth
Battle Royale: compressed, high-intensity human drama

2. Worldview: Cosmic Structure vs. Closed Society

In Endless Myth, the universe itself is the story.
Layered realities and divine hierarchies explore the nature of existence.

In Battle Royale, society is reduced to a minimal system.
Under a government-imposed “Program,” individuals are forced into a controlled environment where they must fight to survive.

Thus:

Endless Myth: cosmic-scale structure
Battle Royale: a minimal model of society

3. Characters: Conceptual Entities vs. Humans at the Limit

Characters in Endless Myth often represent concepts or elements of a vast cosmic system.

In Battle Royale, characters are individuals pushed to their psychological limits.
Fear, friendship, betrayal, and love are exposed in their rawest forms.

So:

Endless Myth: conceptual existence
Battle Royale: human nature under extreme conditions

4. Time and Situation: Infinity vs. Restriction

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
All possibilities coexist across parallel realities.

In Battle Royale, time is strictly limited.
Survival depends on enduring within a fixed timeframe.

This restriction creates intense tension and urgency.

5. Background of Controversy: Violence and Social Anxiety

Battle Royale sparked significant controversy at the time of its release.

The depiction of minors forced to kill each other
Strong criticism of education and authority systems
Graphic and intense violence

These elements led to debates in Japan over its screening and reception.

At the time, concerns about youth behavior and the education system were already present in society.
As a result, the work was not seen as mere fiction, but as a reflection of real social anxieties.

6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Exposure

Endless Myth presents myth as structure—
a system of infinity, cosmos, and existence.

Battle Royale presents narrative as exposure—
revealing human nature under extreme pressure.

Conclusion: Does Myth Define Humanity, or Does Crisis Reveal It?

Endless Myth and Battle Royale approach humanity from completely different directions:

Endless Myth: understanding humanity through the cosmos
Battle Royale: exposing humanity through extreme conditions

The former questions existence through structure.
The latter confronts humanity through situation.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Is humanity defined by its place in the universe—
or only revealed when pushed to its absolute limits?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月2日木曜日

Endless Myth and Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba

— Cosmic Myth and Human Myth —

The novel Endless Myth and Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba may seem completely different at first glance.
One is a multiverse-scale mythology, while the other tells a story of humans and demons in a historical setting.

Yet both works share a common goal: the reconstruction of myth in a modern form.

This article compares them through the perspectives of scale, myth structure, characters, time, and emotion.

1. Form of Myth: Infinite Expansion vs. Focused Narrative

Endless Myth is a mythology that expands infinitely.
It grows into multiverses, omniverses, and even beyond, continuously extending its scope.

In contrast, Demon Slayer is highly focused.
Its narrative centers on the conflict between humans and demons, concentrating all meaning into a single core struggle.

In short:

Endless Myth: infinitely expanding myth
Demon Slayer: concentrated, focused myth

2. Cosmology: Structural Universe vs. Human World

In Endless Myth, the universe itself is the structure of myth.
Multiple layers of reality and divine hierarchies form the foundation of the narrative.

In Demon Slayer, the setting is primarily the human world.
The presence of demons introduces a supernatural element into an otherwise grounded environment.

Thus:

Endless Myth: the universe as myth
Demon Slayer: myth emerging within the human world

3. Characters: Conceptual Beings vs. Emotional Beings

Characters in Endless Myth often represent concepts or structural elements of the universe.
Gods and entities function as parts of a larger cosmic system.

In Demon Slayer, characters are driven by emotion.
Figures like Tanjiro Kamado act מתוך compassion, grief, and personal bonds.

So:

Endless Myth: concept-driven characters
Demon Slayer: emotion-driven characters

4. Concept of Time: Infinite Branching vs. Finite Life

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely.
All possibilities exist simultaneously across parallel realities.

In Demon Slayer, time is finite.
Human life has limits, and death gives weight and urgency to every moment.

This finiteness creates emotional intensity within the story.

5. Meaning of Conflict: Cosmic vs. Personal

Conflicts in Endless Myth operate on a cosmic scale.
They involve the structure, balance, and nature of existence itself.

In Demon Slayer, conflicts are deeply personal.
They are driven by family, loss, revenge, and hope.

6. Essence of Myth: Structure vs. Emotion

Endless Myth presents myth as structure—
a system of infinity, universes, and existence.

Demon Slayer presents myth as emotion—
a narrative driven by human feelings such as love, sorrow, and determination.

Conclusion: Does Myth Exist in the Cosmos or in the Human Heart?

Endless Myth and Demon Slayer reveal two fundamental directions of myth:

Endless Myth: a structural, cosmic mythology
Demon Slayer: an emotional, human-centered mythology

The former builds myth through structure.
The latter builds myth through emotion.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Does myth exist in the vast structure of the cosmos—
or does it truly live within the human heart?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon

2026年4月1日水曜日

Endless Myth and Crisis on Infinite Earths

— A Comparison of Multiverse Myth as Expansion and Integration —

The novel Endless Myth and Crisis on Infinite Earths both center on the concept of the multiverse, yet their purposes and directions are fundamentally different.

One presents a mythology that endlessly expands, while the other reconstructs and consolidates an increasingly complex multiverse into a unified structure.

This article explores their differences through the lens of expansion vs. integration in multiverse mythology.

1. Form of Myth: Expanding Myth vs. Integrating Myth

Endless Myth is built on continuous expansion.
New universes, layers, and concepts are constantly added, allowing the mythology to grow without limit.

In contrast, Crisis on Infinite Earths is about integration.
Multiple parallel Earths are merged into a single unified reality, simplifying and redefining the structure of the multiverse.

In short:

Endless Myth: endlessly expanding myth
Crisis: unified and integrated myth

2. Cosmology: Infinite Hierarchy vs. Unified Universe

In Endless Myth, the cosmos is structured as an infinite hierarchy—multiverse, metaverse, xenoverse, omniverse—extending without end.

In Crisis, countless universes are collapsed into one.
The result is a single, reorganized cosmos with a newly defined continuity.

Thus:

Endless Myth: infinite layered cosmos
Crisis: consolidated single universe

3. Characters: Observers of Structure vs. Guardians of Reality

In Endless Myth, characters function as observers and participants within a vast cosmic system.
They seek to understand or engage with the structure itself.

In Crisis, characters act as defenders of existence.
Figures like Monitor and Anti-Monitor embody the survival or destruction of the multiverse.

So:

Endless Myth: observation and comprehension
Crisis: protection and preservation

4. Time and Causality: Infinite Branching vs. Reconstruction

In Endless Myth, time branches infinitely, allowing all possibilities to coexist simultaneously across different realities.

In Crisis, time and history are reconstructed.
Multiple timelines are merged into a single coherent continuity.

Comparison:

Endless Myth: endlessly branching time
Crisis: reconstructed time

5. Movement of Myth: Expansion vs. Convergence

Endless Myth moves outward indefinitely.
Its myth grows by adding more layers, worlds, and concepts.

Crisis moves inward.
Disparate universes converge into one, restoring order from complexity.

6. Core Purpose as Multiverse Myth

Endless Myth mythologizes possibility itself—the endless generation of worlds and structures.

Crisis on Infinite Earths mythologizes order and clarity—the need to reorganize and redefine an overwhelming multiverse.

Conclusion: Should the Multiverse Expand or Be Unified?

Endless Myth and Crisis on Infinite Earths present two fundamental directions of multiverse mythology:

Endless Myth: an infinitely expanding multiverse
Crisis: an integrated and unified multiverse

The former builds through proliferation.
The latter builds through consolidation.

And this comparison leads to a central question:

Should the multiverse continue expanding without limit—
or gain meaning through unification into a single coherent reality?

Webnovel

AmazonUK

Amazon