2026年1月31日土曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the Marvel Universe

 


The Endless Myth and the Marvel Universe Compared

Myth and the Endless Production of Heroes

At first glance, the novel The Endless Myth and the Marvel Universe, one of the largest entertainment franchises in the world, appear to have little in common. They differ in genre, medium, and tone. Yet they share a crucial structural trait: both generate mythic figures endlessly and are built as narratives that cannot truly end.

This article compares The Endless Myth and the Marvel Universe, focusing on worldbuilding, protagonists, and the role mythology plays in sustaining their stories.


Worldbuilding: A World Ruled by Myth vs. A World That Produces Myth

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system in which myth and faith function as social institutions. Myth is not just a story but a source of order and legitimacy. People cannot escape its meaning. If the myth collapses, the justification for the world itself collapses with it.

The Marvel Universe, by contrast, is an open system that continuously produces new mythic figures within a recognizable modern world. Heroes and villains are constantly introduced, revised, and replaced. Myth does not bind society; it is consumed, updated, and reassembled as entertainment.


Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because humans cannot relinquish meaning. Salvation, destiny, and the idea of being chosen are essential to maintaining the world’s coherence. To end the story would be to hollow out existence itself. Myth must therefore be preserved and retold.

The Marvel Universe continues for structural reasons. It is designed as a system of circulation and expansion. Heroes pass the torch, timelines branch into multiverses, and narratives reset when needed. The story does not persist because of meaning, but because the structure allows infinite continuation.


Protagonists Compared: Consumed by Symbol vs. Choosing the Symbol

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, is consumed as a symbol. From the moment he is chosen, his personal will is subordinated to his mythic role. Freedom exists, but only within the boundaries defined by faith.

Marvel heroes, in many cases, choose to become symbols. Spider-Man accepts the burden of responsibility. Captain America chooses to embody an ideal. They remain individuals who suffer, hesitate, and decide, even as they represent something larger.

  • Messiah: bound and consumed by symbolism

  • Marvel heroes: individuals who willingly shoulder symbolism

This difference clearly reflects the ethical stance of each narrative.


The Relationship Between Myth and Humanity

In The Endless Myth, humanity exists inside mythology. Faith offers protection, but it also imposes an inescapable framework. Myth saves people while simultaneously restricting them.

In the Marvel Universe, myth stands as an extension of humanity. Even gods like Thor are defined by human emotions and conflicts. Myth does not transcend humanity; it is managed, negotiated, and reshaped through human experience.


Differences in Philosophy

The Endless Myth asks:

  • Why do humans need myths?

  • Does faith provide freedom, or does it take it away?

  • Do stories save people, or do they imprison them?

The Marvel Universe focuses on:

  • Responsibility that comes with power

  • The relativity of justice

  • How individual choices shape the world

One is inward-looking and philosophical. The other is outward-looking and ethical, grounded in contemporary society.


Conclusion: Two Models of Endless Myth

Both The Endless Myth and the Marvel Universe are built around narratives that never end, but they do so for opposite reasons:

  • A myth that cannot end because losing it would destroy meaning

  • A myth that never ends because it keeps expanding

In one world, myth governs humanity. In the other, humanity continually rewrites myth.
This contrast highlights why myth still matters today, and why stories of heroes and gods continue to be told in radically different forms.


Wattpad

Amazon Marvel 

AmazonUK Marvel 

2026年1月30日金曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the DC Universe

 


The Endless Myth and the DC Universe Compared

How Mythologies That Never End Shape Their Worlds

At first glance, the novel The Endless Myth and the American comic-book franchise known as the DC Universe seem to belong to completely different categories. One is a philosophical fantasy centered on faith and myth, while the other is a long-running superhero universe built for popular entertainment. Yet both share a crucial structural similarity: they are worlds sustained by myths that never truly end.

This article compares The Endless Myth and the DC Universe from the perspectives of mythology, heroes, and narrative continuity, revealing how each approaches the idea of an “eternal story.”


Worldbuilding: Fixed Myth vs. Continuously Updated Myth

The world of The Endless Myth is a closed system shaped by faith and mythology. Myth is not merely a story from the past; it functions as a living institution that defines values, order, and meaning. People survive by believing in myth, but they are also trapped by it. If the myth collapses, the meaning of the world itself collapses with it.

The DC Universe, by contrast, treats myth as something constantly rewritten and reinterpreted. Characters like Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman are modern myths, but their origins, personalities, and values are repeatedly revised to reflect changing times. Through reboots, alternate timelines, and multiverses, the DC world remains open and endlessly expandable.


Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot end because humanity cannot let go of meaning. Myths are preserved, retold, and reshaped to prevent existential collapse. An ending would signify the loss of purpose itself, so the narrative resists closure by design.

The DC Universe continues for more practical reasons. Characters die and return, worlds are destroyed and rebuilt, and continuity is reset when needed. Here, myth survives through consumption and regeneration, not preservation. The story never ends because it is structurally designed to continue.


Protagonists Compared: Bound by Symbol vs. Performing the Symbol

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah Christ, is a figure consumed by symbolism. Chosen by myth, his personal desires and emotions are overwritten by the role he must fulfill. Being “chosen” strips him of freedom.

DC heroes, on the other hand, embrace their symbolic roles. Superman acts as the embodiment of hope. Batman consciously becomes a symbol of fear. They are aware of what they represent and choose to continue performing those roles.

  • Messiah: a person bound and consumed by symbolism

  • DC heroes: individuals who actively perform symbolism

This contrast highlights a fundamental difference in how each narrative treats identity and agency.


Humanity’s Place in the World

In The Endless Myth, humans exist inside a mythological structure. Free will exists, but only within limits defined by faith and narrative roles. Meaning governs reality.

In the DC Universe, humans and heroes are agents of change. Even when gods or cosmic beings appear, final responsibility rests with individuals. This reflects a strong humanistic worldview, where choice and action ultimately matter.


Differences in Philosophy

The Endless Myth centers on questions such as:

  • Why do humans need myths?

  • Is faith salvation, or is it a form of bondage?

  • How do stories come to control people?

The DC Universe explores themes like:

  • Power and responsibility

  • Multiple definitions of justice

  • The importance of continuing to show hope

One turns inward, questioning belief itself. The other turns outward, emphasizing social ideals and moral action.


Conclusion: Two Forms of Endless Myth

Both The Endless Myth and the DC Universe revolve around narratives that never truly end, but for opposite reasons:

  • A myth that cannot end because losing it would destroy meaning

  • A myth that never ends because it is endlessly rewritten

One confines humanity within myth; the other allows myth to evolve alongside society. Together, they illuminate the many roles that mythology continues to play in the modern world, and why stories that never end remain so powerful.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth VERSION1

The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth VERSION2

Amazon 

AmazonUK

2026年1月29日木曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga

 


The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga Compared: Myth, Destiny, and Stories That Never End

The novel The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga, Japan’s largest and longest-running fantasy series written by Kaoru Kurimoto, are both often described as “endless stories.” However, the meaning and direction of that endlessness differ fundamentally between the two works. This article compares The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga, focusing on their worldbuilding, protagonists, concepts of destiny, and narrative structure.


Worldbuilding: A World Closed by Myth vs. A World Opened as History

The world of The Endless Myth is structured as a closed system defined by myth and faith. Myth is not merely a collection of legends but an institutional force that sustains the world itself. People gain order and meaning by believing in myth, yet they cannot escape the constraints that meaning imposes.

By contrast, the world of The Guin Saga unfolds as a historical fantasy shaped by vast continents, multiple nations, ethnic groups, and cultures. Gods and prophecies exist, but they do not unilaterally fix the course of history. Instead, the narrative advances through politics, war, and individual choice.


Why the Stories Never End

The Endless Myth cannot conclude because humanity cannot relinquish meaning. Myth is constantly revised, retold, and preserved. To allow the story to end would be to accept the collapse of the world’s underlying significance.

The Guin Saga became a monumental narrative because it was constructed as an epic of world history. Even when heroes die or nations fall, history does not stop. It is inherited by the next generation and carried forward into a new era.


Protagonists Compared: The Messiah as Symbol vs. Guin as Acting Hero

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, the Messiah, is a “chosen one” who is consumed as a symbol. His personal will and emotions are repeatedly overwritten by the mythic role imposed upon him.

Guin, the protagonist of The Guin Saga, possesses an aura of mystery as a leopard-headed warrior, yet he actively intervenes in history through his own judgment and actions. Although bound by prophecy and fate, how he responds to them and how he acts remains his own decision.


Destiny and Free Will

In The Endless Myth, destiny functions as a mythological structure that restrains individuals. Free will exists, but only within the narrow boundaries permitted by myth.

In The Guin Saga, destiny and prophecy are present, but they are merely elements within the broader flow of history. Characters make mistakes, struggle, and choose, shaping the future through accumulated decisions.


Differences in Ideological Focus

The Endless Myth centers on philosophical questions such as:

  • Why do humans need myth?

  • Is faith a form of salvation or a form of bondage?

  • What does it mean for stories to rule over people?

The Guin Saga, on the other hand, presents a grand heroic epic that explores:

  • Power and responsibility

  • War and the state

  • The influence of individuals on the course of history

Its ideas are embedded within a forward-moving narrative rather than presented through direct philosophical inquiry.


Conclusion: Two Directions of Endless Storytelling

Both The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga are narratives without a definitive end, yet they embody opposing structures:

  • A myth that cannot end because it cannot abandon meaning

  • An epic that does not end because history continues to unfold

One turns inward, questioning belief and meaning, while the other expands outward, tracing the relentless movement of history. Their contrast highlights a fundamental truth: stories endure not only because they are long, but because they answer different human needs.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth version1

The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth version2

Amazon

2026年1月28日水曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the World’s Longest-Running Novel Series, Jerry Cotton

 


The Endless Myth and the Jerry Cotton Series Compared: Endless Stories of Myth and Mass-Produced Heroes

At first glance, the novel The Endless Myth and the long-running German crime fiction series Jerry Cotton seem to belong to entirely different genres. The former is a philosophical fantasy centered on myth and faith, while the latter is a mass-produced hardboiled series featuring an FBI agent as its protagonist. Yet both share a crucial common trait: they are built on narrative structures that are not meant to end. This article compares The Endless Myth and the Jerry Cotton series, focusing on why their stories continue indefinitely and how they portray human agency.


Genre and Worldview

The Endless Myth depicts a closed world in which faith and mythology form the basis of social order. Myth functions not only as story but as institution, binding people to meaning and shaping how they live.

By contrast, the Jerry Cotton series is set in contemporary America and follows criminal investigations grounded in realism. Law and order serve as the foundation of the world, and there are no mythological elements. Each story revolves around the cycle of crime and resolution.


Why the Stories Never End

In The Endless Myth, the story cannot end because people continue to need myth. Myths are constantly revised, retold, and preserved. Allowing the story to end would mean the collapse of meaning itself.

The Jerry Cotton series continues for far more practical reasons. Crimes never stop occurring, and the protagonist continues to solve them as part of his professional role. The series is sustained not by narrative continuity, but by repetition.


Protagonists Compared: Symbol vs. Function

The protagonist of The Endless Myth, the Messiah, is consumed as a symbol. His personal emotions and choices are overwritten by the role imposed on him by myth.

Jerry Cotton, on the other hand, is depicted as an almost unchanging character. He shows little growth or transformation and exists primarily to fulfill a function: solving cases as an FBI agent.

  • The Messiah: a bearer of imposed meaning

  • Jerry Cotton: a performer of assigned duties

This contrast reveals a fundamental difference in narrative purpose.


Humanity’s Position in the World

In The Endless Myth, humans appear to shape the world, yet in reality they are trapped within mythological structures. Free will exists only in limited form.

In the Jerry Cotton series, humans are problem solvers. Although the world is thrown into disorder by crime, order is ultimately restored through human judgment and action. This reflects a clear form of humanism.


Presence or Absence of Ideology

The Endless Myth centers on philosophical questions such as:

  • What is faith?

  • Why do humans need stories?

  • How does meaning come to restrain human freedom?

The Jerry Cotton series does not foreground ideology. Instead, it consistently presents moral clarity and professional ethics. Readers are not asked to reflect deeply, but to feel reassurance in the restoration of order.


Conclusion: Opposite Reasons for Endless Stories

The Endless Myth and the Jerry Cotton series represent two opposing models of narrative continuity:

  • A story that cannot end because it cannot abandon meaning

  • A story that does not end because it continues to perform its function

One binds people through myth, while the other keeps the world turning through roles and routines. Though both are “endless,” their internal logic is fundamentally different. This contrast highlights the diverse ways stories function within society.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth version1

The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth version2

Amazon

2026年1月27日火曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the World’s Longest-Running Science Fiction Series, Perry Rhodan

 


The Endless Myth and the Perry Rhodan Series Compared: Why These Stories Never End

At first glance, the novel The Endless Myth and the long-running German science fiction series Perry Rhodan appear vastly different in genre and setting. Yet both works share a fundamental question: why do certain stories refuse to end, and how does humanity confront forces that exceed its scale and understanding? This article offers an SEO-conscious comparison of The Endless Myth and the Perry Rhodan series, focusing on worldview, narrative structure, and humanity’s role.


Worldbuilding Scale: A Closed Mythological World vs. An Ever-Expanding Universe

The world of The Endless Myth is a fantasy setting structured by myth and belief. Meaning is circulated and preserved through faith, creating a closed system in which the world is constantly rewritten from within. While its physical scale is limited, its philosophical density is high.

By contrast, the Perry Rhodan series depicts an open and expanding cosmic history. The narrative continuously moves outward, from Earth to galaxies, supergalaxies, and even higher-dimensional realms. New civilizations and intelligences are endlessly introduced.


Why the Stories Never End

In The Endless Myth, the story does not end because humanity cannot relinquish meaning. Myths are sustained through belief and fear of collapse. Ending the myth would mean losing the framework that gives the world coherence.

In the Perry Rhodan series, the story continues because history itself keeps advancing. The universe evolves, new stages of existence emerge, and new challenges replace old ones. The lack of an ending is not stagnation, but progression.


Humanity’s Position: Subordinate to Myth vs. Agents of Cosmic History

In The Endless Myth, humans are subordinate to myth. Figures such as messiahs and priests are consumed as symbols and forced to carry roles that exceed their personal will. Individuals serve the maintenance of the narrative rather than shaping history.

In the Perry Rhodan series, humanity gradually becomes a central actor in cosmic affairs. Starting as a fragile civilization, humankind grows to:

  • Negotiate with alien cultures

  • Confront higher intelligences

  • Influence the balance of the universe

Here, humanity is not consumed by history but actively participates in its creation.


Depictions of Transcendent Beings

The gods of The Endless Myth are formed through faith and narrative. They are not absolute truths, but collective projections of human meaning-making.

In the Perry Rhodan universe, higher beings and superintelligences possess godlike power, yet they are presented as components of a rational cosmos. Even transcendence is framed within a science-fictional logic.


Ideological Direction: Introspective Myth vs. Forward-Moving Epic

The Endless Myth is an inward-looking work that questions:

  • What faith truly is

  • Why humans need stories

  • The dangers of being bound by meaning

The Perry Rhodan series, on the other hand, is a forward-driven epic focused on:

  • The evolution of intelligence

  • Expansion and coexistence

  • The will to move history forward


Conclusion: Endless Myth and Endless Cosmic History

The Endless Myth and the Perry Rhodan series portray two contrasting forms of narrative continuity:

  • A story that cannot end because it cannot abandon meaning

  • A story that does not end because evolution never stops

Both explore how humanity confronts structures and entities that surpass it. The crucial difference lies in direction: The Endless Myth turns inward, while Perry Rhodan looks endlessly outward.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth

Perry Rhodan

2026年1月26日月曜日

**A Comparison Between *The Endless Myth* and the SCP Foundation Universe**

 


The Endless Myth and the SCP Foundation Compared: Faith, Containment, and Worlds That Never End

Although the novel The Endless Myth and the SCP Foundation universe differ greatly in format and genre, they share core thematic concerns: how humanity confronts the incomprehensible, and why stories are never allowed to end but instead continue to be maintained and managed. This article offers an SEO-conscious comparison of The Endless Myth and the SCP works, focusing on worldview, humanity’s position, and the reasons these narratives persist.


Foundational Worldviews: A World Sustained by Faith vs. A World Sustained by Containment

The world of The Endless Myth is sustained by faith and mythology. People gain order through belief, and myth itself functions as a social structure. For this world, the end of myth would mean the collapse of meaning itself.

In contrast, the SCP universe is one in which anomalous phenomena are neither believed in nor worshiped, but contained and managed. The SCP Foundation operates under the principle of “Secure, Contain, Protect.” Stability is preserved not through faith, but through secrecy, documentation, and control.


Gods and Anomalies: Sacred Narratives vs. Classified Objects

In The Endless Myth, gods and miracles gain power through being spoken of and believed in. They are conceptual entities whose form is shaped by narrative and faith.

In the SCP universe, even godlike beings are reduced to “objects.” They are cataloged, assigned numbers, threat levels, and containment procedures. Worship and salvation are stripped away, replaced by reports, protocols, and redactions. Myth is dismantled and archived.


Humanity’s Role: Becoming Symbols vs. Performing Duties

In The Endless Myth, humans become part of the myth itself. Figures such as messiahs and priests are consumed as symbols and forced to bear meaning beyond their personal will.

In the SCP universe, humans are not symbols but personnel. Researchers, agents, and D-class subjects confront anomalies as part of their assigned roles. Individuals are replaceable, and no one is meant to become the protagonist of the story.


Different Forms of Fear

The fear in The Endless Myth emerges from:

  • Structures of belief that cannot be escaped

  • Stories that must never be allowed to end

  • Righteousness that becomes a form of constraint

This is a social and ideological fear.

By contrast, the SCP universe generates fear through:

  • The concrete existence of incomprehensible entities

  • The fragility of everyday life when containment fails

  • The erosion of humanity through documentation and procedure

This fear is practical, clinical, and deeply impersonal.


Why the Stories Never End

In The Endless Myth, stories persist because humans continue to seek meaning. Myths are endlessly rewritten and preserved because allowing them to end would mean surrendering purpose itself.

In the SCP universe, anomalies are rarely resolved. They are contained rather than eliminated, and as long as containment continues, documentation accumulates. Stories do not end because management never ends.


A Shared Rejection of Human-Centered Worldviews

Both works reject the idea that humans stand at the center of the universe.

  • In The Endless Myth, humanity is subordinate to myth

  • In the SCP universe, humanity is powerless before anomalies

In different ways, both depict worlds where human understanding and ethics fail to fully apply.


Conclusion: Worlds That Believe and Worlds That Contain

The Endless Myth and the SCP universe represent two opposing responses to the unknown:

  • A world that survives by believing in myth

  • A world that survives by containing the abnormal

One is bound by faith, the other cooled by control. Yet both are the result of humanity’s distorted attempts to coexist with what it cannot fully understand.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth VERSION1

The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth VERSION2

Amazon

SCP


2026年1月25日日曜日

A Comparison Between The Endless Myth and the Cthulhu Mythos

 


The Endless Myth and the Cthulhu Mythos Compared: Faith, Fear, and Why Myths Never End

At first glance, the novel The Endless Myth and the Cthulhu Mythos, systematized by H. P. Lovecraft, appear to belong to entirely different genres. Yet both grapple with the same fundamental question: why do humans create myths, and why are they ultimately ruled by them? This article offers an SEO-conscious comparison of The Endless Myth and the Cthulhu Mythos, examining their worldviews, concepts of divinity, and the place of humanity within them.


Worldview Premises: A World That Requires Meaning vs. A World Where Meaning Collapses

The world of The Endless Myth is one that demands meaning. People maintain order by believing in myth, and stories themselves sustain reality. Myth functions as a social structure, and the loss of meaning would equal the collapse of the world.

In contrast, the world of the Cthulhu Mythos presents meaning itself as an illusion. The universe exists independently of human understanding or morality, and the gods—known as the Great Old Ones—offer no salvation or concern. Human-made myths are portrayed as psychological defenses, fragile illusions meant to shield the mind from cosmic terror.


The Nature of the Gods: Gods Sustained by Faith vs. Gods That Need No Belief

In The Endless Myth, gods gain form and power through belief. They are not fixed absolutes, but concepts continuously rewritten through narrative and faith.

The gods of the Cthulhu Mythos, however, require no belief at all. They simply exist. To perceive them is to risk madness. Faith offers no salvation here; it is merely another path toward insanity.


Humanity’s Position: Humans as Symbols vs. Humans as Insignificant

In The Endless Myth, humans are carriers of myth. Figures such as messiahs and priests are turned into symbols and forced to shoulder meaning. Though consumed by narrative, they remain central to the world’s structure.

In the Cthulhu Mythos, humanity is fundamentally insignificant. There are no saviors or chosen ones—only beings who are broken by forbidden knowledge. This uncompromising denial of human importance defines the mythos’ unique horror.


Different Forms of Fear

The fear in The Endless Myth arises from:

  • Stories that cannot be allowed to end

  • Structures of belief that cannot be escaped

  • Righteousness that becomes a form of restraint

It is a social and ideological fear.

By contrast, the fear of the Cthulhu Mythos stems from:

  • Incomprehensible entities

  • Cosmic indifference

  • The collapse of human reason

This is metaphysical, cosmic horror.


Why the Myths Never End

In The Endless Myth, myths persist because humans continue to seek meaning. Ending the story would mean surrendering purpose itself, so the myth is endlessly revised and preserved.

In the Cthulhu Mythos, the concept of a myth “ending” is meaningless. The universe operates entirely outside human narratives; myth is nothing more than a label humans impose on an uncaring reality.


A Shared Rejection of Human-Centered Thinking

Despite their opposing directions, both works strongly reject human exceptionalism.

  • The Endless Myth exposes humanity’s dependence on meaning

  • The Cthulhu Mythos confronts humanity with a universe where meaning does not exist

Both ultimately reach the same conclusion: humans are not special.


Conclusion: The Horror of Meaning and the Horror of Meaninglessness

The Endless Myth and the Cthulhu Mythos represent two contrasting mythic systems:

  • A world that cannot end because it depends on meaning

  • A world that is unbearable because it has none

Each forces readers to confront how humanity relates to the universe. The fear of being bound by belief and the fear of being exposed to cosmic indifference—deciding which is more terrifying is left to the reader.


The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth


Amazon