The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga Compared: Myth, Destiny, and Stories That Never End
The novel The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga, Japan’s largest and longest-running fantasy series written by Kaoru Kurimoto, are both often described as “endless stories.” However, the meaning and direction of that endlessness differ fundamentally between the two works. This article compares The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga, focusing on their worldbuilding, protagonists, concepts of destiny, and narrative structure.
Worldbuilding: A World Closed by Myth vs. A World Opened as History
The world of The Endless Myth is structured as a closed system defined by myth and faith. Myth is not merely a collection of legends but an institutional force that sustains the world itself. People gain order and meaning by believing in myth, yet they cannot escape the constraints that meaning imposes.
By contrast, the world of The Guin Saga unfolds as a historical fantasy shaped by vast continents, multiple nations, ethnic groups, and cultures. Gods and prophecies exist, but they do not unilaterally fix the course of history. Instead, the narrative advances through politics, war, and individual choice.
Why the Stories Never End
The Endless Myth cannot conclude because humanity cannot relinquish meaning. Myth is constantly revised, retold, and preserved. To allow the story to end would be to accept the collapse of the world’s underlying significance.
The Guin Saga became a monumental narrative because it was constructed as an epic of world history. Even when heroes die or nations fall, history does not stop. It is inherited by the next generation and carried forward into a new era.
Protagonists Compared: The Messiah as Symbol vs. Guin as Acting Hero
The protagonist of The Endless Myth, the Messiah, is a “chosen one” who is consumed as a symbol. His personal will and emotions are repeatedly overwritten by the mythic role imposed upon him.
Guin, the protagonist of The Guin Saga, possesses an aura of mystery as a leopard-headed warrior, yet he actively intervenes in history through his own judgment and actions. Although bound by prophecy and fate, how he responds to them and how he acts remains his own decision.
Destiny and Free Will
In The Endless Myth, destiny functions as a mythological structure that restrains individuals. Free will exists, but only within the narrow boundaries permitted by myth.
In The Guin Saga, destiny and prophecy are present, but they are merely elements within the broader flow of history. Characters make mistakes, struggle, and choose, shaping the future through accumulated decisions.
Differences in Ideological Focus
The Endless Myth centers on philosophical questions such as:
Why do humans need myth?
Is faith a form of salvation or a form of bondage?
What does it mean for stories to rule over people?
The Guin Saga, on the other hand, presents a grand heroic epic that explores:
Power and responsibility
War and the state
The influence of individuals on the course of history
Its ideas are embedded within a forward-moving narrative rather than presented through direct philosophical inquiry.
Conclusion: Two Directions of Endless Storytelling
Both The Endless Myth and The Guin Saga are narratives without a definitive end, yet they embody opposing structures:
A myth that cannot end because it cannot abandon meaning
An epic that does not end because history continues to unfold
One turns inward, questioning belief and meaning, while the other expands outward, tracing the relentless movement of history. Their contrast highlights a fundamental truth: stories endure not only because they are long, but because they answer different human needs.
The World That Was Never the Same - Endless Myth version1
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿