A Comparative Study of The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes — Mythic Structure vs. Historical Epic
The novel The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes are both grand works that depict the fate of humanity on a vast scale. Yet their narrative directions differ profoundly.
The Endless Myth is a story of structure, in which the world is sustained by myth and belief.
Legend of the Galactic Heroes is a story of history, in which politics, war, and ideology shape civilisation.
This article compares their world-building, protagonists, views of power, and concepts of “the end.”
World Structure: A Closed Myth vs. A Flowing History
In The Endless Myth, the world is stabilised by myth. Reality persists because it is narrated and believed. If myth collapses, meaning collapses—and with it, the foundation of the world. Time feels cyclical and structurally enclosed.
By contrast, Legend of the Galactic Heroes unfolds across a vast interstellar civilisation divided between autocracy and democracy. History moves forward. Regimes rise and fall. Political change reshapes the galaxy.
The Endless Myth: Meaning sustains reality.
Legend of the Galactic Heroes: Politics and history drive change.
Protagonists: Symbolic Figure vs. Historical Individuals
The protagonist of The Endless Myth, Messiah, functions as a symbolic centre of a mythic system. He embodies a role more than a personal ambition. His freedom is secondary to the structure he upholds.
In contrast, the central figures of Legend of the Galactic Heroes—
Reinhard von Lohengramm and
Yang Wen-li—are extraordinary yet fundamentally human.
Reinhard pursues imperial unification through ambition and genius.
Yang defends democracy through scepticism and strategic brilliance.
They are not mythic absolutes but historical actors shaped by ideology and circumstance.
God and Power
In The Endless Myth, God occupies the structural centre of existence. Divinity guarantees order and coherence. Faith anchors reality.
In Legend of the Galactic Heroes, there is no absolute deity governing events. Instead, power resides in institutions, political systems, and individual leadership. Emperors and assemblies alike are flawed. Ideals are constrained by human limitations.
The Endless Myth: Order originates from mythic absolutes.
Legend of the Galactic Heroes: Order emerges from political systems.
The Meaning of “The End”
In The Endless Myth, the end arrives when myth disappears. Apocalypse is philosophical—the death of meaning itself.
In Legend of the Galactic Heroes, endings occur through regime change or the deaths of great figures. Yet history does not cease; it transforms and continues.
One presents an ontological end.
The other portrays historical continuity.
Scale and Aftertaste
The Endless Myth leaves readers contemplating existential questions: Why do humans need myth? Can meaning survive without belief?
Legend of the Galactic Heroes challenges readers with political philosophy: Is an ideal state possible? Can democracy or autocracy truly fulfil humanity’s needs?
Both works are epic in scale, yet their directions diverge:
One is existential and structural.
The other is historical and political.
Conclusion: The Fate of Myth and the Fate of Humanity
Both The Endless Myth and Legend of the Galactic Heroes address the future of humanity. However, they do so from opposite perspectives:
A narrative that questions the foundations of existence through myth.
A narrative that examines governance, ideology, and historical change.
One asks why the world exists.
The other asks how humanity should rule itself.
It is this contrast that makes the comparison between these two works so compelling.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿