A Comparative Analysis of The Endless Myth and Star Trek
Myth and Reason as Two Visions of the Future
The novel The Endless Myth and the iconic science fiction franchise Star Trek both depict humanity and the universe on a grand scale. One is a story centred on myth and faith, while the other is grounded in science, reason, and humanistic ideals. At first glance, they appear to represent opposing worldviews.
Yet both works ask the same fundamental question: what should humanity believe in, and what should guide the world forward? This article compares The Endless Myth and Star Trek, focusing on their worldbuilding, views of humanity, and narrative structures.
Worldviews Compared: A World Governed by Myth vs. a Universe Expanded by Reason
The world of The Endless Myth is a closed structure in which myth and belief function as the foundation of order. Gods exist because they are spoken of, and the world remains stable as long as its myths are maintained. Meaning offers salvation, but it also acts as a constraint.
By contrast, the universe of Star Trek is open and expansive, driven by science and exploration. The unknown is not sacred or forbidden, but something to be understood. Technologies such as warp travel and contact with alien civilisations symbolise humanity’s ability to transcend limits through reason.
-
The Endless Myth: a world closed by meaning
-
Star Trek: a universe expanded by reason
Why the Stories Continue
The Endless Myth cannot end because losing its myths would mean the collapse of the world’s meaning. The story survives by being retold, and the concept of an ending itself is rejected.
Star Trek continues because exploration never ends. The universe always presents new worlds, cultures, and ethical dilemmas. The narrative is sustained not by repetition, but by forward movement.
Protagonists and Views of Humanity
In The Endless Myth, the protagonist Messiah is consumed as a chosen symbol. His personal will is secondary to the mythic role imposed upon him.
In Star Trek, protagonists such as Kirk, Picard, and Sisko are not symbols but decision-makers. They are not chosen by destiny; they choose, judge, and accept responsibility for their actions.
-
Messiah: a bearer of imposed meaning
-
Star Trek captains: agents of choice
Gods and Transcendence
In The Endless Myth, gods are embedded within the structure of the world and sustained by belief. Faith creates divinity, and divinity defines reality.
In Star Trek, god-like beings such as Q or higher-dimensional entities appear, but they are ultimately subject to dialogue, ethics, and understanding. Transcendence is not worshipped; it is examined and relativised through reason.
Philosophical Focus
The Endless Myth raises inward-looking, existential questions:
-
Why do humans need myths?
-
Is a life bound by meaning a form of salvation?
-
Does faith preserve the world, or imprison it?
Star Trek presents forward-looking, humanistic questions:
-
Can reason overcome conflict?
-
Can diversity coexist peacefully?
-
Can progress align with ethics?
Conclusion: A World Sustained by Belief and a Universe Driven by Inquiry
The Endless Myth and Star Trek portray two different forms of continuity:
-
A myth that cannot end because meaning must be preserved
-
A future that does not end because exploration never stops
The former sustains the world through belief; the latter advances the future through inquiry. Together, they present two enduring human strategies for surviving an uncertain universe.
Myth or reason.
Faith or exploration.
Both are, in their own way, stories that refuse to end.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿